These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32074656)

  • 61. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. Surgical technique.
    Meneghini RM; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Mar; 91 Suppl 2 Pt 1():131-8. PubMed ID: 19255205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Long-Term Results After Total Knee Arthroplasty with Contemporary Rotating-Hinge Prostheses.
    Cottino U; Abdel MP; Perry KI; Mara KC; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Feb; 99(4):324-330. PubMed ID: 28196034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Two-Year Survivorship and Outcomes of a Three-Dimensional Printed Metaphyseal Cone in the Setting of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Monárrez R; Bains SS; Chen Z; Sax OC; Salib CG; Mont MA; Delanois RE
    J Knee Surg; 2022 Dec; 35(14):1540-1543. PubMed ID: 36538941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The Use of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Siddiqi A; Chen AF; Piuzzi NS; Kelly MA
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2021 Sep; 29(18):e904-e920. PubMed ID: 34432730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Diaphyseal Impaction Grafting Combined with Metaphyseal Cones: Outcomes in 88 Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties.
    Bedard NA; Dugdale EM; Couch CC; Lewallen DG; Sierra RJ; Berry DJ; Abdel MP
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2024 Jul; 106(14):1293-1299. PubMed ID: 38691581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Survivorship and Radiographic Evaluation of Metaphyseal Cones With Short Cemented Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Behery OA; Shing EZ; Yu Z; Springer BD; Fehring TK; Otero JE
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb; 37(2):330-335. PubMed ID: 34742873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Preliminary clinical results of coated porous tibia cones in septic and aseptic revision knee arthroplasty.
    Ohlmeier M; Lausmann C; Wolff M; Abdelaziz H; Gehrke T; Citak M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2021 Apr; 141(4):555-560. PubMed ID: 32274569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The Use of Trabecular Metal Cones in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Brown NM; Bell JA; Jung EK; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG; Levine BR
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Sep; 30(9 Suppl):90-3. PubMed ID: 26100475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. The Cost-Effectiveness of Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Serino J; Burnett RA; Boniello AJ; Yang J; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S50-S55. PubMed ID: 35569918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. [The use of tantalum cones for reconstruction of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty].
    Gebauer M; Gehrke T; Jakobs O
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2015 Feb; 27(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 25648256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Bone Defects in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty and Management.
    Lei PF; Hu RY; Hu YH
    Orthop Surg; 2019 Feb; 11(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 30809942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Use of stepped porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves for tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term results.
    Barnett SL; Mayer RR; Gondusky JS; Choi L; Patel JJ; Gorab RS
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1219-24. PubMed ID: 24444570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Metaphyseal sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasties: Computational analysis of bone remodeling.
    Nogueira P; Folgado J; Quental C; Gamelas J
    Knee; 2022 Aug; 37():10-19. PubMed ID: 35660534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Knee revision arthroplasty : cementless, metaphyseal fixation with sleeves].
    Graichen H; Strauch M; Scior W; Morgan-Jones R
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2015 Feb; 27(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 25620192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Total knee arthroplasty after distal femoral osteotomy long-term survivorship and clinical outcomes.
    Chalmers BP; Limberg AK; Athey AG; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Jun; 101-B(6):660-666. PubMed ID: 31154844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Metaphyseal sleeves in arthroplasty of the knee : A suitable tool in management of major metaphyseal bone loss.
    Lycke C; Zajonz D; Brand A; Prietzel T; Heyde CE; Roth A; Ghanem M
    Orthopade; 2021 Sep; 50(9):750-757. PubMed ID: 33084914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Management of metaphyseal bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty.
    Mancuso F; Beltrame A; Colombo E; Miani E; Bassini F
    Acta Biomed; 2017 Jun; 88(2S):98-111. PubMed ID: 28657571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Metaphyseal Sleeves for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Good Short-Term Outcomes.
    Bugler KE; Maheshwari R; Ahmed I; Brenkel IJ; Walmsley PJ
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Nov; 30(11):1990-4. PubMed ID: 26115984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Long WJ; Scuderi GR
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Oct; 24(7):1086-92. PubMed ID: 18823749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Comparison of Different Strategies in Revision Arthroplasty of the Knee with Severe Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.
    Byttebier P; Dhont T; Pintelon S; Rajgopal A; Burssens A; Victor J
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S371-S381.e4. PubMed ID: 35271982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.