These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32075447)

  • 21. Biomechanical testing of alloplastic PMMA cranioplasty materials.
    Eppley BL
    J Craniofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 16(1):140-3. PubMed ID: 15699662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Custom-made 3D printing-based cranioplasty using a silicone mould and PMMA.
    Csámer L; Csernátony Z; Novák L; Kővári VZ; Kovács ÁÉ; Soósné Horváth H; Manó S
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):11985. PubMed ID: 37491550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Surgical results of cranioplasty using three-dimensional printing technology.
    Cheng CH; Chuang HY; Lin HL; Liu CL; Yao CH
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 May; 168():118-123. PubMed ID: 29549811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 3d cranial reconstruction using titanium implant - a case report.
    Selvaraj S; Dorairaj J; Shivasankar N
    Afr Health Sci; 2022 Sep; 22(3):383-390. PubMed ID: 36910405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cranioplasty Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Printing: Custom-Made Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Implants for Skull Defects.
    Park EK; Lim JY; Yun IS; Kim JS; Woo SH; Kim DS; Shim KW
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 27(4):943-9. PubMed ID: 27192643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Feasibility of Customised Polymethyl Methacrylate Implants Fabricated Using 3D Printed Flexible Moulds for Correction of Facial Skeletal Deformities.
    Jain R; Mahendru S; Aggarwal A; Brajesh V; Aulakh HS; Singh S; Jain A; Khazanchi RK
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 32(6):1981-1985. PubMed ID: 33645954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [First Experience with Cranioplasty Using the Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implant - Retrospective Five-Year Follow-up Study].
    Šámal F; Ouzký M; Strnad J; Haninec P; Linzer P; Filip M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2019; 86(6):431-434. PubMed ID: 31941571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term results following titanium cranioplasty of large skull defects.
    Cabraja M; Klein M; Lehmann TN
    Neurosurg Focus; 2009 Jun; 26(6):E10. PubMed ID: 19485714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Use of a 3D Skull Model to Improve Accuracy in Cranioplasty for Autologous Flap Resorption in a 3-Year-Old Child.
    Maduri R; Viaroli E; Levivier M; Daniel RT; Messerer M
    Pediatr Neurosurg; 2017; 52(5):351-355. PubMed ID: 28848112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computer-Guided In-House Cranioplasty: Establishing a Novel Standard for Cranial Reconstruction and Proposal of an Updated Protocol.
    Tel A; Tuniz F; Fabbro S; Sembronio S; Costa F; Robiony M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Dec; 78(12):2297.e1-2297.e16. PubMed ID: 32898484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study on Methods of Cranial Reconstruction.
    Iaccarino C; Viaroli E; Fricia M; Serchi E; Poli T; Servadei F
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Dec; 73(12):2375-8. PubMed ID: 26253012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An Outcomes Comparison Between Autologous and Alloplastic Cranioplasty in the Pediatric Population.
    Fu KJ; Barr RM; Kerr ML; Shah MN; Fletcher SA; Sandberg DI; Teichgraeber JF; Greives MR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 May; 27(3):593-7. PubMed ID: 27035597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. An Alternate Vista in Rehabilitation of Cranial Defects: Combining Digital and Manual Techniques to Fabricate a Hybrid Cranioplast.
    Kaur H; Nanda A; Koli D; Verma M; Singh H; Bishnoi I; Pathak P; Gupta A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 26(4):1313-5. PubMed ID: 26080183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Customized anterior temporal augmentation for treating anterior temporal hollowing (ATH) by 3D-printed cranioplasty.
    Wongsirisuwan M
    Neurochirurgie; 2024 Jan; 70(1):101528. PubMed ID: 38142616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Polymethyl Methacrylate in Patient-Specific Implants: Description of a New Three-Dimension Technique.
    Ridwan-Pramana A; Idema S; Te Slaa S; Verver F; Wolff J; Forouzanfar T; Peerdeman S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019; 30(2):408-411. PubMed ID: 30676441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With PEEK Versus Titanium Cranioplasty Reconstruction.
    Asaad M; Taslakian EN; Banuelos J; Abu-Ghname A; Bite U; Mardini S; Van Gompel JJ; Sharaf B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jan-Feb 01; 32(1):193-197. PubMed ID: 33074970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cranioplasty Using Customized 3-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Implants: An International Collaboration Effort to Improve Neurosurgical Care.
    Nguyen B; Ashraf O; Richards R; Tra H; Huynh T
    World Neurosurg; 2021 May; 149():174-180. PubMed ID: 33647494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Customised Cranioplasty Implant for Decompressive Craniectomy Patients ? A Technical Note.
    Mohammad K
    Turk Neurosurg; 2019; 29(1):148-150. PubMed ID: 28481392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Comparison of Autologous Bone, Methyl-Methacrylate, Porous Polyethylene, and Titanium Mesh in Cranioplasty.
    Celik H; Kurtulus A; Yildirim ME; Tekiner A; Erdem Y; Kantarci K; Kul H; Bayar MA
    Turk Neurosurg; 2022; 32(5):841-844. PubMed ID: 35652181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using rapid prototyping molds to create patient specific polymethylmethacrylate implants in cranioplasty.
    Gerber N; Stieglitz L; Peterhans M; Nolte LP; Raabe A; Weber S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3357-60. PubMed ID: 21097234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.