These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32077067)

  • 21. Unmasking individual differences in adult reading procedures by disrupting holistic orthographic perception.
    Hirshorn EA; Simcox T; Durisko C; Perfetti CA; Fiez JA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233041. PubMed ID: 32453792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitivity to configural information and expertise in visual word recognition.
    Wong AC; Wong YK; Lui KFH; Ng TYK; Ngan VSH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jan; 45(1):82-99. PubMed ID: 30596434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Brain activity while reading words and pseudo-words: a comparison between dyslexic and fluent readers.
    Shaul S; Arzouan Y; Goldstein A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jun; 84(3):270-6. PubMed ID: 22465207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Phonological-orthographic consistency for Japanese words and its impact on visual and auditory word recognition.
    Hino Y; Kusunose Y; Miyamura S; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Jan; 43(1):126-146. PubMed ID: 27808550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Word Frequency Effects for LEET Lettering in Word Recognition.
    Grabbe JW
    Am J Psychol; 2016; 129(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 27029105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of Spatial Frequencies on Word Identification by Fast and Slow Readers: Evidence from Eye Movements.
    Jordan TR; Dixon J; McGowan VA; Kurtev S; Paterson KB
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1433. PubMed ID: 27733837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Statistical models of morphology predict eye-tracking measures during visual word recognition.
    Lehtonen M; Varjokallio M; Kivikari H; Hultén A; Virpioja S; Hakala T; Kurimo M; Lagus K; Salmelin R
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1245-1269. PubMed ID: 31102191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
    Schmidtke D; Matsuki K; Kuperman V
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Nov; 43(11):1793-1820. PubMed ID: 28447810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Whole-object effects in visual word processing: Parallels with and differences from face recognition.
    Feizabadi M; Albonico A; Starrfelt R; Barton JJS
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2021 May; 38(3):231-257. PubMed ID: 34529548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of age and word frequency on Korean visual word recognition: Evidence from a web-based large-scale lexical-decision task.
    Baek H; Gordon PC; Choi W
    Psychol Aging; 2024 May; 39(3):231-244. PubMed ID: 38236269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Parafoveal preview benefit is modulated by the precision of skilled readers' lexical representations.
    Veldre A; Andrews S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):219-32. PubMed ID: 25384238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.
    Balota DA; Chumbley JI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1984 Jun; 10(3):340-57. PubMed ID: 6242411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Disentangling cross-language orthographic neighborhood from markedness effects in L2 visual word recognition.
    Commissaire E; Audusseau J; Casalis S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):353-359. PubMed ID: 30187442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inhibition and facilitation in visual word recognition: prefrontal contribution to the orthographic neighborhood size effect.
    Fiebach CJ; Ricker B; Friederici AD; Jacobs AM
    Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(3):901-11. PubMed ID: 17498973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Examining the interactivity of lexical orthographic and phonological processing.
    Owen WJ; Borowsky R
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2003 Dec; 57(4):290-303. PubMed ID: 14710866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Early Brain Sensitivity to Word Frequency and Lexicality During Reading Aloud and Implicit Reading.
    Faísca L; Reis A; Araújo S
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():830. PubMed ID: 31031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition.
    Carreiras M; Armstrong BC; Perea M; Frost R
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2014 Feb; 18(2):90-8. PubMed ID: 24373885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does letter rotation slow down orthographic processing in word recognition?
    Perea M; Marcet A; Fernández-López M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2295-2300. PubMed ID: 29392634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. N170 ERPs could represent a logographic processing strategy in visual word recognition.
    Simon G; Petit L; Bernard C; Rebaï M
    Behav Brain Funct; 2007 Apr; 3():21. PubMed ID: 17451598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Early processing of orthographic language membership information in bilingual visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs.
    Hoversten LJ; Brothers T; Swaab TY; Traxler MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Aug; 103():183-190. PubMed ID: 28743547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.