These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32077069)

  • 1. Talker normalization is mediated by structured indexical information.
    Stilp CE; Theodore RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2237-2243. PubMed ID: 32077069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Varying acoustic-phonemic ambiguity reveals that talker normalization is obligatory in speech processing.
    Choi JY; Hu ER; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Apr; 80(3):784-797. PubMed ID: 29417449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implicit and explicit learning in talker identification.
    Lee JJ; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):2002-2015. PubMed ID: 35534783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple sources of acoustic variation affect speech processing efficiency.
    Kapadia AM; Tin JAA; Perrachione TK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Jan; 153(1):209. PubMed ID: 36732274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual learning of multiple talkers: Determinants, characteristics, and limitations.
    Cummings SN; Theodore RM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Oct; 84(7):2335-2359. PubMed ID: 36076119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):391-409. PubMed ID: 17469975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants.
    Jusczyk PW; Pisoni DB; Mullennix J
    Cognition; 1992 Jun; 43(3):253-91. PubMed ID: 1643815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Talker identification across source mechanisms: experiments with laryngeal and electrolarynx speech.
    Perrachione TK; Stepp CE; Hillman RE; Wong PC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1651-65. PubMed ID: 24801962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distinct mechanisms for talker adaptation operate in parallel on different timescales.
    Choi JY; Kou RSN; Perrachione TK
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):627-634. PubMed ID: 34731443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clearly, fame isn't everything: Talker familiarity does not augment talker adaptation.
    Hatter ER; King CJ; Shorey AE; Stilp CE
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):962-975. PubMed ID: 36417128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length.
    Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Words Get in the Way: Linguistic Effects on Talker Discrimination.
    Narayan CR; Mak L; Bialystok E
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Jul; 41(5):1361-1376. PubMed ID: 27445079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Lewis DE; Smith NA; Spalding JL; Valente DL
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):783-794. PubMed ID: 29252979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL; DeSteno D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):544-52. PubMed ID: 12558290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Listeners' attitudes toward accented talkers uniquely predicts accented speech perception.
    Ingvalson EM; Lansford KL; Federova V; Fernandez G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL234. PubMed ID: 28372098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Takayanagi S; Dirks DD; Moshfegh A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 12069010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.