137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32077523)
1. Toward precise arterial input functions derived from DCE-MRI through a novel extracorporeal circulation approach in mice.
Backhaus P; Büther F; Wachsmuth L; Frohwein L; Buchholz R; Karst U; Schäfers K; Hermann S; Schäfers M; Faber C
Magn Reson Med; 2020 Sep; 84(3):1404-1415. PubMed ID: 32077523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Blind deconvolution estimation of an arterial input function for small animal DCE-MRI.
Jiřík R; Taxt T; Macíček O; Bartoš M; Kratochvíla J; Souček K; Dražanová E; Krátká L; Hampl A; Starčuk Z
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():46-56. PubMed ID: 31150814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative sensitivities of DCE-MRI pharmacokinetic parameters to arterial input function (AIF) scaling.
Li X; Cai Y; Moloney B; Chen Y; Huang W; Woods M; Coakley FV; Rooney WD; Garzotto MG; Springer CS
J Magn Reson; 2016 Aug; 269():104-112. PubMed ID: 27288764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Keil VC; Mädler B; Gieseke J; Fimmers R; Hattingen E; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 40():83-90. PubMed ID: 28438713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pharmacokinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using a reference region and input function tail.
Ahmed Z; Levesque IR
Magn Reson Med; 2020 Jan; 83(1):286-298. PubMed ID: 31393033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Arterial input function calculation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: an in vivo validation study using co-registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Mehrabian H; Chandrana C; Pang I; Chopra R; Martel AL
Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1735-47. PubMed ID: 22752523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The arterial input function: Spatial dependence within the imaging volume and its influence on 3D quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for head and neck cancer.
Roberts J; Kim SE; Kholmovski EG; Hitchcock Y; Richards TJ; Anzai Y
Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Sep; 101():40-46. PubMed ID: 37030177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters from DCE-MRI by extracting long and short time-dependent features using an LSTM network.
Zou J; Balter JM; Cao Y
Med Phys; 2020 Aug; 47(8):3447-3457. PubMed ID: 32379942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.
Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M
Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved hepatic arterial fraction estimation using cardiac output correction of arterial input functions for liver DCE MRI.
Chouhan MD; Bainbridge A; Atkinson D; Punwani S; Mookerjee RP; Lythgoe MF; Taylor SA
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(4):1533-1546. PubMed ID: 28002045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A simulation study comparing nine mathematical models of arterial input function for dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to the Parker model.
He D; Xu L; Qian W; Clarke J; Fan X
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2018 Jun; 41(2):507-518. PubMed ID: 29569210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT.
Driscoll B; Keller H; Coolens C
Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4866-80. PubMed ID: 21928658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.
Spanakis M; Kontopodis E; Van Cauter S; Sakkalis V; Marias K
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Oct; 43(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 27647272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of model-based arterial input functions for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor bearing rats.
McGrath DM; Bradley DP; Tessier JL; Lacey T; Taylor CJ; Parker GJ
Magn Reson Med; 2009 May; 61(5):1173-84. PubMed ID: 19253360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model.
Yankeelov TE; Luci JJ; Lepage M; Li R; Debusk L; Lin PC; Price RR; Gore JC
Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):519-29. PubMed ID: 15919597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for mouse models using automatic detection of the arterial input function.
Kim JH; Im GH; Yang J; Choi D; Lee WJ; Lee JH
NMR Biomed; 2012 Apr; 25(4):674-84. PubMed ID: 21954069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimization of two-compartment-exchange-model analysis for dynamic contrast-enhanced mri incorporating bolus arrival time.
Nadav G; Liberman G; Artzi M; Kiryati N; Bashat DB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jan; 45(1):237-249. PubMed ID: 27383624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
