These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32078576)

  • 1. An extended model for phylogenetic maximum likelihood based on discrete morphological characters.
    Spade DA
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2020 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 32078576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data.
    Lewis PO
    Syst Biol; 2001; 50(6):913-25. PubMed ID: 12116640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian analysis using a simple likelihood model outperforms parsimony for estimation of phylogeny from discrete morphological data.
    Wright AM; Hillis DM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109210. PubMed ID: 25279853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design.
    McCormack JE; Huang H; Knowles LL
    Syst Biol; 2009 Oct; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Utility of characters evolving at diverse rates of evolution to resolve quartet trees with unequal branch lengths: analytical predictions of long-branch effects.
    Su Z; Townsend JP
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 May; 15():86. PubMed ID: 25968460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Among-character rate variation distributions in phylogenetic analysis of discrete morphological characters.
    Harrison LB; Larsson HC
    Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):307-24. PubMed ID: 25527198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An amino acid substitution-selection model adjusts residue fitness to improve phylogenetic estimation.
    Wang HC; Susko E; Roger AJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 31(4):779-92. PubMed ID: 24441033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of models for nucleotide substitution used in maximum-likelihood phylogenetic estimation.
    Yang Z; Goldman N; Friday A
    Mol Biol Evol; 1994 Mar; 11(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 8170371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Most Parsimonious Likelihood Exhibits Multiple Optima for Compatible Characters.
    Matsieva J; St John K
    Bull Math Biol; 2020 Jan; 82(1):10. PubMed ID: 31932987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Estimating trees from filtered data: identifiability of models for morphological phylogenetics.
    Allman ES; Holder MT; Rhodes JA
    J Theor Biol; 2010 Mar; 263(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 20004210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Topology selection in unrooted molecular phylogenetic tree by minimum model-based complexity method.
    Tanaka H; Ren F; Okayama T; Gojobori T
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 1999; ():326-37. PubMed ID: 10380208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the quirks of maximum parsimony and likelihood on phylogenetic networks.
    Bryant C; Fischer M; Linz S; Semple C
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Mar; 417():100-108. PubMed ID: 28087420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the information content of discrete phylogenetic characters.
    Bordewich M; Deutschmann IM; Fischer M; Kasbohm E; Semple C; Steel M
    J Math Biol; 2018 Sep; 77(3):527-544. PubMed ID: 29248985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Upper bounds on maximum likelihood for phylogenetic trees.
    Hendy MD; Holland BR
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Oct; 19 Suppl 2():ii66-72. PubMed ID: 14534174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phylogenetic analysis and intraspecific variation: performance of parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods.
    Wiens JJ; Servedio MR
    Syst Biol; 1998 Jun; 47(2):228-53. PubMed ID: 12064228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of comparative data using generalized estimating equations.
    Paradis E; Claude J
    J Theor Biol; 2002 Sep; 218(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 12381290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consistency, characters, and the likelihood of correct phylogenetic inference.
    Givnish TJ; Sytsma KJ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 1997 Jun; 7(3):320-30. PubMed ID: 9187091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DPRml: distributed phylogeny reconstruction by maximum likelihood.
    Keane TM; Naughton TJ; Travers SA; McInerney JO; McCormack GP
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(7):969-74. PubMed ID: 15513992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robustness of Phylogenetic Inference to Model Misspecification Caused by Pairwise Epistasis.
    Magee AF; Hilton SK; DeWitt WS
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Sep; 38(10):4603-4615. PubMed ID: 34043795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of Continuous Traits Can Improve Morphological Phylogenetics.
    Parins-Fukuchi C
    Syst Biol; 2018 Mar; 67(2):328-339. PubMed ID: 28945906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.