219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32079385)
1. Metabolic Characteristics and Diagnostic Contribution of
Arslan E; Aksoy T; Gündoğan C; Şen Ç; Yılmaz Tatar S; Dursun N; Çermik TF
Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2020 Feb; 29(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 32079385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiple metabolic parameters and visual assessment of
Ren Y; Liu J; Wang L; Luo Y; Ding X; Shi A; Liu J
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Nov; 45(11):3569-3580. PubMed ID: 32274551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating molecular subtypes and clinicopathological features of primary breast cancer.
Arslan E; Çermik TF; Trabulus FDC; Talu ECK; Başaran Ş
Nucl Med Commun; 2018 Jul; 39(7):680-690. PubMed ID: 29893750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings in endometrial cancer patients: the correlation between SUVmax and clinicopathologic features.
Boonya-ussadorn T; Choi WH; Hyun J; Kim SH; Chung SK; Yoo IeR
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Feb; 97 Suppl 2():S115-22. PubMed ID: 25518184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy of [
Zhang S; Wang W; Xu T; Ding H; Li Y; Liu H; Huang Y; Liu L; Du T; Zhao Y; Chen Y; Qiu L
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():925100. PubMed ID: 35847877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymph node standardized uptake values at pre-treatment
Jeong Y; Baek S; Park JW; Joo JH; Kim JS; Lee SW
Br J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 90(1071):20160239. PubMed ID: 28008776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of F-18 FDG PET/CT with optimal cut-offs of maximum standardized uptake value according to size for diagnosis of regional lymph node metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
Bae SU; Won KS; Song BI; Jeong WK; Baek SK; Kim HW
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Sep; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 30217167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Relationship Between HER-2 Expression Levels and
Ertürk SA; Hasbek Z; Özer H
Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2021 Oct; 30(3):150-157. PubMed ID: 34658230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The clinical value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography for predicting regional lymph node metastasis and non-curative surgery in primary gastric carcinoma.
Choi JY; Shim KN; Kim SE; Jung HK; Jung SA; Yoo K
Korean J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 64(6):340-7. PubMed ID: 25530585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of [
Jiang D; Chen X; You Z; Wang H; Zhang X; Li X; Ren S; Huang Q; Hua F; Guan Y; Zhao J; Xie F
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 Jan; 49(2):732-742. PubMed ID: 34297193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic value of SUVmax and metabolic tumor volume on 18F-FDG PET/CT in early stage non-small cell lung cancer patients without LN metastasis.
Yoo IeR; Chung SK; Park HL; Choi WH; Kim YK; Lee KY; Wang YP
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):3091-103. PubMed ID: 25227018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predictive value of 18
Xue J; Zheng J; Guo H; Wang X; Han A
Mol Clin Oncol; 2015 Jan; 3(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 25469279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Relationship of SUV Value in PET-CT with Tumor Differentiation and Tumor Markers in Gastric Cancer.
Maman A; Sahin A; Ayan AK
Eurasian J Med; 2020 Feb; 52(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 32158318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The maximum standardized uptake value of metastatic site in 18 F-FDG PET/CT predicts molecular subtypes and survival in metastatic breast cancer: An Izmir Oncology Group study.
Cokmert S; Tanriverdi O; Karapolat I; Demir L; Bayoglu V; Can A; Akyol M; Yilmaz Y; Oktay Tarhan M
J BUON; 2016; 21(6):1410-1418. PubMed ID: 28039701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volumetric parameters on
Liu G; Hu Y; Cheng X; Wang Y; Gu Y; Liu T; Shi H
BMC Cancer; 2019 Aug; 19(1):790. PubMed ID: 31395059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Prognostic Value of
Arslan E; Aksoy T; Gürsu RU; Dursun N; Çakar E; Çermik TF
Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther; 2020 Feb; 29(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 32079384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Areas of high 18F-FDG uptake on preradiotherapy PET/CT identify preferential sites of local relapse after chemoradiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.
Calais J; Thureau S; Dubray B; Modzelewski R; Thiberville L; Gardin I; Vera P
J Nucl Med; 2015 Feb; 56(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 25572091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diagnostic ability of
Lee JW; Kim EY; Kim DJ; Lee JH; Kang WJ; Lee JD; Yun M
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4515-4523. PubMed ID: 26943133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
