134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32079771)
1. Bumble bees display cross-modal object recognition between visual and tactile senses.
Solvi C; Gutierrez Al-Khudhairy S; Chittka L
Science; 2020 Feb; 367(6480):910-912. PubMed ID: 32079771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cross-modal tactile-visual neural representations in bumble bees.
James TW
Learn Behav; 2020 Dec; 48(4):393-394. PubMed ID: 32643103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recruitment of Foveal Retinotopic Cortex During Haptic Exploration of Shapes and Actions in the Dark.
Monaco S; Gallivan JP; Figley TD; Singhal A; Culham JC
J Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 37(48):11572-11591. PubMed ID: 29066555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Representations of microgeometric tactile information during object recognition.
Yasaka K; Mori T; Yamaguchi M; Kaba H
Cogn Process; 2019 Feb; 20(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 30446884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pure associative tactile agnosia for the left hand: clinical and anatomo-functional correlations.
Veronelli L; Ginex V; Dinacci D; Cappa SF; Corbo M
Cortex; 2014 Sep; 58():206-16. PubMed ID: 25046697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Touch improves visual discrimination of object features in capuchin monkeys (Sapajus spp.).
Carducci P; Squillace V; Manzi G; Truppa V
Behav Processes; 2020 Mar; 172():104044. PubMed ID: 31954810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Static images of novel, moveable objects learned through touch activate visual area hMT+.
Chan JS; Simões-Franklin C; Garavan H; Newell FN
Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(2):1708-16. PubMed ID: 19815082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cross-modal visuo-haptic mental rotation: comparing objects between senses.
Volcic R; Wijntjes MW; Kool EC; Kappers AM
Exp Brain Res; 2010 Jun; 203(3):621-7. PubMed ID: 20437169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Vision influences on tactile discrimination of grating orientation].
Wada Y
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Aug; 78(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 17892028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What does an insect see?
Horridge A
J Exp Biol; 2009 Sep; 212(17):2721-9. PubMed ID: 19684204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence for Independent Processing of Shape by Vision and Touch.
Miller RL; Sheinberg DL
eNeuro; 2022; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 35998295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cross-modal object recognition and dynamic weighting of sensory inputs in a fish.
Schumacher S; Burt de Perera T; Thenert J; von der Emde G
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jul; 113(27):7638-43. PubMed ID: 27313211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual and Tactile Sensory Systems Share Common Features in Object Recognition.
Tabrik S; Behroozi M; Schlaffke L; Heba S; Lenz M; Lissek S; Güntürkün O; Dinse HR; Tegenthoff M
eNeuro; 2021; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 34544756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Object recognition combining vision and touch.
Corradi T; Hall P; Iravani P
Robotics Biomim; 2017; 4(1):2. PubMed ID: 28480157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence for a specific role for muscarinic receptors in crossmodal object recognition in rats.
Jacklin DL; Kelly P; Bianchi C; MacDonald T; Traquair H; Winters BD
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2015 Feb; 118():125-32. PubMed ID: 25490059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Object Recognition in Flight: How Do Bees Distinguish between 3D Shapes?
Werner A; Stürzl W; Zanker J
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0147106. PubMed ID: 26886006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Crossmodal object recognition in rats with and without multimodal object pre-exposure: no effect of hippocampal lesions.
Reid JM; Jacklin DL; Winters BD
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2012 Oct; 98(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 22975081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of Wi-Fi electromagnetic waves in unimodal and multimodal object recognition tasks in male rats.
Hassanshahi A; Shafeie SA; Fatemi I; Hassanshahi E; Allahtavakoli M; Shabani M; Roohbakhsh A; Shamsizadeh A
Neurol Sci; 2017 Jun; 38(6):1069-1076. PubMed ID: 28332042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chimpanzees process structural isomorphisms across sensory modalities.
Ravignani A; Sonnweber R
Cognition; 2017 Apr; 161():74-79. PubMed ID: 28135575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The answer is blowing in the wind: free-flying honeybees can integrate visual and mechano-sensory inputs for making complex foraging decisions.
Ravi S; Garcia JE; Wang C; Dyer AG
J Exp Biol; 2016 Nov; 219(Pt 21):3465-3472. PubMed ID: 27591315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
