132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32080033)
1. Salpingectomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Roeckner JT; Sawangkum P; Sanchez-Ramos L; Duncan JR
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 135(3):550-557. PubMed ID: 32080033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Salpingectomy Compared With Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Garcia C; Moskowitz OM; Chisholm CA; Duska LR; Warren AL; Lyons GR; Pettit KE
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 132(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 29889755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complete salpingectomy versus tubal ligation during cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang M; Du Y; Hu Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Nov; 34(22):3794-3802. PubMed ID: 31752570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Feasibility of Complete Salpingectomy Compared With Standard Postpartum Tubal Ligation at Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Subramaniam A; Blanchard CT; Erickson BK; Szychowski J; Leath CA; Biggio JR; Huh WK
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 132(1):20-27. PubMed ID: 29889762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Salpingectomy for Sterilization: Change in Practice in a Large Integrated Health Care System, 2011-2016.
Powell CB; Alabaster A; Simmons S; Garcia C; Martin M; McBride-Allen S; Littell RD
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):961-967. PubMed ID: 29016486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy vs tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery.
Venkatesh KK; Clark LH; Stamilio DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):106.e1-106.e10. PubMed ID: 30170036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Salpingectomy versus Tubal Occlusion for Permanent Contraception during Cesarean Delivery: Outcomes and Physician Attitudes.
Levy D; Casey S; Zemtsov G; Whiteside JL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):860-864. PubMed ID: 32745622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.
Lawrie TA; Kulier R; Nardin JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD003034. PubMed ID: 27494193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.
Lawrie TA; Kulier R; Nardin JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; (9):CD003034. PubMed ID: 26343930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Paradigm shift from tubal ligation to opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery in the United States.
Mandelbaum RS; Matsuzaki S; Sangara RN; Klar M; Matsushima K; Roman LD; Paulson RJ; Wright JD; Matsuo K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):399.e1-399.e32. PubMed ID: 34181896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery.
Shinar S; Blecher Y; Alpern S; Many A; Ashwal E; Amikam U; Cohen A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1185-1189. PubMed ID: 28285425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Opportunistic salpingectomy during postpartum contraception procedures at elective and unscheduled cesarean delivery.
Ferrari F; Forte S; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Odicino F
Contraception; 2019 Jun; 99(6):373-376. PubMed ID: 30898658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postpartum Permanent Sterilization: Could Bilateral Salpingectomy Replace Bilateral Tubal Ligation?
Danis RB; Della Badia CR; Richard SD
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):928-32. PubMed ID: 27234430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Smid MC; Dotters-Katz SK; Grace M; Wright ST; Villers MS; Hardy-Fairbanks A; Stamilio DM
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):969-978. PubMed ID: 29016508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bilateral salpingectomy versus bilateral partial salpingectomy during cesarean delivery.
Duncan JR; Jones HL; Hoffer SO; Schenone MH; Mari G
Int J Womens Health; 2018; 10():649-653. PubMed ID: 30425586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ovarian reserve following cesarean section with salpingectomy vs tubal ligation: a randomized trial.
Ganer Herman H; Gluck O; Keidar R; Kerner R; Kovo M; Levran D; Bar J; Sagiv R
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):472.e1-472.e6. PubMed ID: 28455082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Frequency and characteristics associated with opportunistic salpingectomy at cesarean delivery: A retrospective chart review.
Desravines N; Brenner T; Venkatesh K; Stuart G
Contraception; 2021 Mar; 103(3):203-207. PubMed ID: 33345975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Opportunistic salpingectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bonavina G; Busnelli A; Salmeri N; Cavoretto PI; Salvatore S; Candiani M; Bulfoni A
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 38247214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perioperative Complications of Cesarean Delivery Myomectomy: A Meta-analysis.
Pergialiotis V; Sinanidis I; Louloudis IE; Vichos T; Perrea DN; Doumouchtsis SK
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 130(6):1295-1303. PubMed ID: 29112662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy versus standard tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery for ovarian cancer risk reduction.
Subramaniam A; Einerson BD; Blanchard CT; Erickson BK; Szychowski J; Leath CA; Biggio JR; Huh WK
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 152(1):127-132. PubMed ID: 30477808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
