215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32081816)
21. Length of Lumbar Interbody Cage Using Radiological Measurements of Chinese Endplates and the Apophyseal Ring.
Sun C; Wang H; Jiang J; Lu F; Ma X; Xia X
World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e1204-e1213. PubMed ID: 29886299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Stepwise reduction of bone mineral density increases the risk of cage subsidence in oblique lumbar interbody fusion patients biomechanically: an in-silico study.
Yang ZQ; Cai P; Li JC; Wang XD; Xie TH; Pu XX; Lin R; Zeng JC; Song YM
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Dec; 23(1):1083. PubMed ID: 36503614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Assessment and classification of subsidence after lateral interbody fusion using serial computed tomography.
Malham GM; Parker RM; Blecher CM; Seex KA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Nov; 23(5):589-597. PubMed ID: 26207320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The predictive value of a novel site-specific MRI-based bone quality assessment, endplate bone quality (EBQ), for severe cage subsidence among patients undergoing standalone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
Jones C; Okano I; Arzani A; Dodo Y; Moser M; Reisener MJ; Chiapparelli E; Adl Amini D; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
Spine J; 2022 Nov; 22(11):1875-1883. PubMed ID: 35843534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Differences in radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a meta-analysis.
Li HM; Zhang RJ; Shen CL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Dec; 20(1):582. PubMed ID: 31801508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Stand-Alone Cages for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Retrospective Study with 1-Year Follow-Up.
Huo Y; Yang D; Ma L; Wang H; Ding W; Yang S
Pain Res Manag; 2020; 2020():9016219. PubMed ID: 32399131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Does Spanning a Lateral Lumbar Interbody Cage Across the Vertebral Ring Apophysis Increase Loads Required for Failure and Mitigate Endplate Violation.
Briski DC; Goel VK; Waddell BS; Serhan H; Kodigudla MK; Palepu V; Agarwal AK; Zavatsky JM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Oct; 42(20):E1158-E1164. PubMed ID: 28472018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predictive value of different site-specific MRI-based assessments of bone quality for cage subsidence among patients undergoing oblique lumbar interbody fusion.
Zheng X; Tong T; Li W; Chen J; Zhu H; Wang Y; Wang L
J Neurosurg Spine; 2024 May; ():1-8. PubMed ID: 38759244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Incidence and impact of implant subsidence after stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
Bocahut N; Audureau E; Poignard A; Delambre J; Queinnec S; Flouzat Lachaniette CH; Allain J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 May; 104(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 29292121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modic changes in vertebral endplates: a comparison of MR imaging and multislice CT.
Kuisma M; Karppinen J; Haapea M; Lammentausta E; Niinimäki J; Tervonen O
Skeletal Radiol; 2009 Feb; 38(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18807028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Risk factors for intervertebral instability assessed by temporal evaluation of the radiographs and reconstructed computed tomography images after L5-S1 single-level transforaminal interbody fusion: A retrospective study.
Kobayashi Y; Shinozaki Y; Takahashi Y; Takaishi H; Ogawa J
J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Jan; 35():92-96. PubMed ID: 27899272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. MRI-based endplate bone quality score predicts cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion.
Ran L; Xie T; Zhao L; Wang C; Luo C; Wu D; You X; Huang S; Zeng J
Spine J; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38754736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical and radiological evaluation of cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with anterolateral fixation.
Zhao L; Xie T; Wang X; Yang Z; Pu X; Lu Y; Zeng J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Mar; 23(1):214. PubMed ID: 35248042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Technical description of oblique lateral interbody fusion at L1-L5 (OLIF25) and at L5-S1 (OLIF51) and evaluation of complication and fusion rates.
Woods KR; Billys JB; Hynes RA
Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):545-553. PubMed ID: 27884744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Does Preoperative Modic Changes Influence the Short-term Fusion Rate of Single Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?-a Matched-pair Case Control Study.
Xiao Y; Xiu P; Yang X; Wang L; Li T; Gong Q; Liu L; Song Y
Orthop Surg; 2023 Sep; 15(9):2309-2317. PubMed ID: 37439298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Precautions for Combined Anterior and Posterior Long-Level Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity: Perioperative Surgical Complications Related to the Anterior Procedure (Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion).
Kim WJ; Lee JW; Kim SM; Park KY; Chang SH; Song DG; Choy WS
Asian Spine J; 2019 Oct; 13(5):823-831. PubMed ID: 31154755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative Study of the Difference of Perioperative Complication and Radiologic Results: MIS-DLIF (Minimally Invasive Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion) Versus MIS-OLIF (Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion).
Jin J; Ryu KS; Hur JW; Seong JH; Kim JS; Cho HJ
Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Feb; 31(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 28059946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using nonresorbable poly-ether-ether-ketone versus resorbable poly-L-lactide-co-D,L-lactide fusion devices: a prospective, randomized study to assess fusion and clinical outcome.
Jiya T; Smit T; Deddens J; Mullender M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 19179917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Biomechanical Evaluation of Stand-Alone Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Under 3 Different Bone Mineral Density Conditions: A Finite Element Analysis.
Wang Z; Ma R; Cai Z; Wang Z; Yang S; Ge Z
World Neurosurg; 2021 Nov; 155():e285-e293. PubMed ID: 34418606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Mid-term results of 360-degree lumbar spondylodesis with the use of a tantalum implant for disc replacement].
Matejka J; Zeman J; Belatka J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):388-93. PubMed ID: 19912702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
