215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32081816)
41. Are stand-alone cages sufficient for anterior lumbar interbody fusion?
Zhang JD; Poffyn B; Sys G; Uyttendaele D
Orthop Surg; 2012 Feb; 4(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 22290813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Influence of the geometric and material properties of lumbar endplate on lumbar interbody fusion failure: a systematic review.
Yu Y; Robinson DL; Ackland DC; Yang Y; Lee PVS
J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 17(1):224. PubMed ID: 35399075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates - a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis.
Fogel G; Martin N; Lynch K; Pelletier MH; Wills D; Wang T; Walsh WR; Williams GM; Malik J; Peng Y; Jekir M
Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1028-1037. PubMed ID: 35017054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Stand-alone interbody cage versus anterior cervical plate for treatment of cervical disc herniation: sequential changes in cage subsidence.
Fujibayashi S; Neo M; Nakamura T
J Clin Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1017-22. PubMed ID: 18653347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Biomechanical effects of cage positions and facet fixation on initial stability of the anterior lumbar interbody fusion motion segment.
Hueng DY; Chung TT; Chuang WH; Hsu CP; Chou KN; Lin SC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Jun; 39(13):E770-6. PubMed ID: 24732834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Subsidence of metal interbody cage after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation.
Tokuhashi Y; Ajiro Y; Umezawa N
Orthopedics; 2009 Apr; 32(4):. PubMed ID: 19388615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Does Vertebral End Plate Morphology Affect Cage Subsidence After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
Zhou QS; Chen X; Xu L; Li S; Du CZ; Sun X; Wang B; Zhu ZZ; Qiu Y
World Neurosurg; 2019 Oct; 130():e694-e701. PubMed ID: 31279113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Analysis of a Unilateral Bridging Cage for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: 2-Year Clinical Results and Fusion Rate with a Focus on Subsidence.
Heinz von der Hoeh N; Villa T; Galbusera F; Voelker A; Spiegl UA; Jarvers JS; Heyde CE
World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e308-e314. PubMed ID: 29738859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Risk factors for cage migration and cage retropulsion following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Park MK; Kim KT; Bang WS; Cho DC; Sung JK; Lee YS; Lee CK; Kim CH; Kwon BK; Lee WK; Han I
Spine J; 2019 Mar; 19(3):437-447. PubMed ID: 30142459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Hounsfield units as predictor for cage subsidence and loss of reduction: following posterior-anterior stabilization in thoracolumbar spine fractures.
Ullrich BW; Schenk P; Spiegl UJ; Mendel T; Hofmann GO
Eur Spine J; 2018 Dec; 27(12):3034-3042. PubMed ID: 30341626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Does the formation of vertebral endplate cysts predict nonunion after lumbar interbody fusion?
Fujibayashi S; Takemoto M; Izeki M; Takahashi Y; Nakayama T; Neo M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):E1197-202. PubMed ID: 22588381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Assessment of vertebral bone mineral density and stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease and primary lumbar degenerative diseases.
Zhou J; Yuan C; Liu C; Liu M; Zhou L; Wang J
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2022; 30(1):10225536221091846. PubMed ID: 35410526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Accuracy of the lateral cage placement under intraoperative C-arm fluoroscopy in oblique lateral interbody fusion.
Chung NS; Lee HD; Jeon CH
J Orthop Sci; 2018 Nov; 23(6):918-922. PubMed ID: 30119930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Minimally Invasive Oblique Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Anterolateral Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease.
Xie T; Wang C; Yang Z; Xiu P; Yang X; Wang X; Wang D; Song Y; Zeng J
World Neurosurg; 2020 Mar; 135():e671-e678. PubMed ID: 31884124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Biomechanical Effects of an Oblique Lumbar PEEK Cage and Posterior Augmentation.
Soriano-Baron H; Newcomb AGUS; Malhotra D; Martinez Del Campo E; Palma AE; Theodore N; Crawford NR; Kelly BP; Kaibara T
World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e975-e981. PubMed ID: 30876999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Letter to the editor regarding, "Low Hounsfield units on computed tomography are associated with cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF)" by Liyu Ran et al.
Pu HY; Huang K; Wei P
Spine J; 2023 May; 23(5):785. PubMed ID: 36764584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Subsidence of Spinal Fusion Cages: A Systematic Review.
Parisien A; Wai EK; ElSayed MSA; Frei H
Int J Spine Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1103-1118. PubMed ID: 36289005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A study on the structural properties of the lumbar endplate: histological structure, the effect of bone density, and spinal level.
Hou Y; Luo Z
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):E427-33. PubMed ID: 19454994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Cortical Endplate Bone Density Measured by Novel Phantomless Quantitative Computed Tomography May Predict Cage Subsidence more Conveniently and Accurately.
Di M; Weng Y; Wang G; Bian H; Qi H; Wu H; Chen C; Dou Y; Wang Z; Ma X; Xu B; Zhu S; Lu WW; Yang Q
Orthop Surg; 2023 Dec; 15(12):3126-3135. PubMed ID: 37853959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of hybrid graft in patients with Modic changes undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
Jiao J; Li J; Luo Y; Zhang W
J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Aug; 16(1):486. PubMed ID: 34380501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
