140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32083414)
1. Percutaneous cryoablation vs. open partial nephrectomy in small kidney cancers: the Italian experience.
Celia A; Pusceddu C; Silvestri T; Gidaro GB; Iannello F; Lanati EP; D'Ausilio A
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Apr; 73(2):178-186. PubMed ID: 32083414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Percutaneous Cryoablation versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy of Renal T1A Tumors: a Single-Center Retrospective Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Garcia RG; Katz M; Falsarella PM; Malheiros DT; Fukumoto H; Lemos GC; Teich V; Salvalaggio PR
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2021 Jun; 44(6):892-900. PubMed ID: 33388867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Percutaneous Cryoablation vs Partial Nephrectomy: Cost Comparison of T1a Tumors.
Chehab M; Friedlander JA; Handel J; Vartanian S; Krishnan A; Wong CY; Korman H; Seifman B; Ciacci J
J Endourol; 2016 Feb; 30(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 26154481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Costs analysis of laparoendoscopic, single-site laparoscopic and open surgery for cT1 renal masses in a European high-volume centre.
Pini G; Ascalone L; Greco F; Mohammed N; Fornara P
World J Urol; 2014 Dec; 32(6):1501-10. PubMed ID: 24346843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost analysis of open, laparoscopic, and percutaneous treatment options for nephron-sparing surgery.
Link RE; Permpongkosol S; Gupta A; Jarrett TW; Solomon SB; Kavoussi LR
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):782-9. PubMed ID: 17094755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The relationship of postoperative complications with in-hospital outcomes and costs after renal surgery for kidney cancer.
Kim SP; Leibovich BC; Shah ND; Weight CJ; Borah BJ; Han LC; Boorjian SA; Thompson RH
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):580-8. PubMed ID: 22564425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Protocol for a feasibility study of a cohort embedded randomised controlled trial comparing
Neves JB; Cullen D; Grant L; Walkden M; Bandula S; Patki P; Barod R; Mumtaz F; Aitchison M; Pizzo E; Ranieri V; Williams N; Wildgoose W; Gurusamy K; Emberton M; Bex A; Tran MGB
BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(6):e030965. PubMed ID: 31189686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost comparison of nephron-sparing treatments for cT1a renal masses.
Castle SM; Gorbatiy V; Avallone MA; Eldefrawy A; Caulton DE; Leveillee RJ
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1327-32. PubMed ID: 22361086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative financial analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for small renal tumours < or =3.5 cm: a single institutional experience.
Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Robertson C; Albala D; Walther P; Polascik TJ
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):715-20; discussion 720-1. PubMed ID: 16904255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative effectiveness, costs and trends in treatment of small renal masses from 2005 to 2007.
Kowalczyk KJ; Choueiri TK; Hevelone ND; Trinh QD; Lipsitz SR; Nguyen PL; Lynch JH; Hu JC
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E273-80. PubMed ID: 23452093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Short-term Outcomes and Costs Following Partial Nephrectomy in England: A Population-based Study.
Camp C; O'Hara J; Hughes D; Adshead J
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jul; 4(4):579-585. PubMed ID: 28753878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass.
Guillotreau J; Haber GP; Autorino R; Miocinovic R; Hillyer S; Hernandez A; Laydner H; Yakoubi R; Isac W; Long JA; Stein RJ; Kaouk JH
Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):899-904. PubMed ID: 22264680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Functional and oncological outcome of percutaneous cryoablation versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal tumors: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Yanagisawa T; Miki J; Shimizu K; Fukuokaya W; Urabe F; Mori K; Sasaki H; Kimura T; Miki K; Egawa S
Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 38(12):938.e1-938.e7. PubMed ID: 33036899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness of Management Options for Small Renal Mass: A Systematic Review.
Wang Y; Chen YW; Leow JJ; Levy AC; Chang SL; Gelpi FH
Am J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 39(5):484-90. PubMed ID: 27322701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Health resource use after robot-assisted surgery vs open and conventional laparoscopic techniques in oncology: analysis of English secondary care data for radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy.
Hughes D; Camp C; O'Hara J; Adshead J
BJU Int; 2016 Jun; 117(6):940-7. PubMed ID: 26696305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic and open partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: a matched-pair comparison with a long-term follow-up.
Wang Y; Shao J; Ma X; Du Q; Gong H; Zhang X
World J Urol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 27194142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of laparoscopic and percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors: a cost analysis.
Badwan K; Maxwell K; Venkatesh R; Figenshau RS; Brown D; Chen C; Bhayani SB
J Endourol; 2008 Jun; 22(6):1275-7. PubMed ID: 18578660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes After Cryoablation Versus Partial Nephrectomy for Sporadic Renal Tumors in a Solitary Kidney: A Propensity Score Analysis.
Bhindi B; Mason RJ; Haddad MM; Boorjian SA; Leibovich BC; Atwell TD; Weisbrod AJ; Schmit GD; Thompson RH
Eur Urol; 2018 Feb; 73(2):254-259. PubMed ID: 28967553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A cost comparison of nephron-sparing surgical techniques for renal tumour.
Lotan Y; Cadeddu JA
BJU Int; 2005 May; 95(7):1039-42. PubMed ID: 15839927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cryoablation of small kidney tumors.
Zondervan PJ; Buijs M; de la Rosette JJ; van Delden O; van Lienden K; Laguna MP
Int J Surg; 2016 Dec; 36(Pt C):533-540. PubMed ID: 27500963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
