These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32083560)

  • 1. Task-Irrelevant Sound Corrects Leftward Spatial Bias in Blindfolded Haptic Placement Task.
    Cacciamani L; Sheparovich L; Gibbons M; Crowley B; Carpenter KE; Wack C
    Multisens Res; 2020 Mar; 33(4-5):521-548. PubMed ID: 32083560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Manual preferences for visually- and haptically-guided grasping.
    Stone KD; Gonzalez CL
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():1-10. PubMed ID: 26134414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
    Thomas NA; Elias LJ
    Cortex; 2012 May; 48(5):553-62. PubMed ID: 21227410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do left and right matter for haptic recognition of familiar objects?
    Craddock M; Lawson R
    Perception; 2009; 38(9):1355-76. PubMed ID: 19911633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two hands, one perception: how bimanual haptic information is combined by the brain.
    Squeri V; Sciutti A; Gori M; Masia L; Sandini G; Konczak J
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Jan; 107(2):544-50. PubMed ID: 22031771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Viewing the body modulates neural mechanisms underlying sustained spatial attention in touch.
    Sambo CF; Gillmeister H; Forster B
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jul; 30(1):143-50. PubMed ID: 19519638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seeing and feeling for self and other: proprioceptive spatial location determines multisensory enhancement of touch.
    Cardini F; Haggard P; Ladavas E
    Cognition; 2013 Apr; 127(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 23376293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hysteresis of haptic vertical and straight ahead in healthy human subjects.
    Tarnutzer AA; Schuler JR; Bockisch CJ; Straumann D
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 13():114. PubMed ID: 22998034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Listening to white noise counteracts visual and haptic pseudoneglect.
    Cattaneo Z; Lega C; Vecchi T; Vallar G
    Perception; 2012; 41(11):1395-8. PubMed ID: 23513624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hand asymmetries of tactile attention in younger and older adults.
    Kesayan T; Gasoyan H; Lamb DG; Williamson JB; Heilman KM
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2019 Dec; 41(10):1088-1096. PubMed ID: 31441368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Haptic over visual information in the distribution of visual attention after tool-use in near and far space.
    Park GD; Reed CL
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 233(10):2977-88. PubMed ID: 26126805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhanced visuo-haptic integration for the non-dominant hand.
    Yalachkov Y; Kaiser J; Doehrmann O; Naumer MJ
    Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 1614():75-85. PubMed ID: 25911582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ambient visual information confers a context-specific, long-term benefit on memory for haptic scenes.
    Pasqualotto A; Finucane CM; Newell FN
    Cognition; 2013 Sep; 128(3):363-79. PubMed ID: 23764999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial tuning of tactile attention modulates visual processing within hemifields: an ERP investigation of crossmodal attention.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 166(3-4):402-10. PubMed ID: 16034566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Manual laterality in haptic and visual reaching tasks by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). An association between hand preference and hand accuracy for food discrimination.
    Spinozzi G; Cacchiarelli B
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(13):1685-92. PubMed ID: 11099726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Related but different: Examining pseudoneglect in audition, touch and vision.
    Eardley AF; Darling S; Dumper P; Browne D; Van Velzen J
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Apr; 113():164-171. PubMed ID: 28242465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in the haptic change task.
    Heller MA; Jones ML; Walk AM; Schnarr R; Hasara A; Litwiller B
    J Gen Psychol; 2010; 137(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 20198816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial coordinate systems for tactile spatial attention depend on developmental vision: evidence from event-related potentials in sighted and congenitally blind adult humans.
    Röder B; Föcker J; Hötting K; Spence C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 28(3):475-83. PubMed ID: 18702719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tactile localization biases are modulated by gaze direction.
    Medina S; Tamè L; Longo MR
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 236(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 29018928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interacting effects of vision and attention in perceiving spontaneous sensations arising on the hands.
    Michael GA; Dupuy MA; Deleuze A; Humblot M; Simon B; Naveteur J
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Jan; 216(1):21-34. PubMed ID: 22009129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.