BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32083658)

  • 1. Hierarchical chromatin organization detected by TADpole.
    Soler-Vila P; Cuscó P; Farabella I; Di Stefano M; Marti-Renom MA
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2020 Apr; 48(7):e39. PubMed ID: 32083658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of topologically associating domain callers over mammals at high resolution.
    Sefer E
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):127. PubMed ID: 35413815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SpectralTAD: an R package for defining a hierarchy of topologically associated domains using spectral clustering.
    Cresswell KG; Stansfield JC; Dozmorov MG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):319. PubMed ID: 32689928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods for the Analysis of Topologically Associating Domains (TADs).
    Zufferey M; Tavernari D; Ciriello G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2301():39-59. PubMed ID: 34415530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ClusterTAD: an unsupervised machine learning approach to detecting topologically associated domains of chromosomes from Hi-C data.
    Oluwadare O; Cheng J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 18(1):480. PubMed ID: 29137603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of hierarchical chromatin domains.
    Weinreb C; Raphael BJ
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 32(11):1601-9. PubMed ID: 26315910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Structural heterogeneity and functional diversity of topologically associating domains in mammalian genomes.
    Wang XT; Dong PF; Zhang HY; Peng C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Sep; 43(15):7237-46. PubMed ID: 26150425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reciprocal insulation analysis of Hi-C data shows that TADs represent a functionally but not structurally privileged scale in the hierarchical folding of chromosomes.
    Zhan Y; Mariani L; Barozzi I; Schulz EG; Blüthgen N; Stadler M; Tiana G; Giorgetti L
    Genome Res; 2017 Mar; 27(3):479-490. PubMed ID: 28057745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MrTADFinder: A network modularity based approach to identify topologically associating domains in multiple resolutions.
    Yan KK; Lou S; Gerstein M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1005647. PubMed ID: 28742097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regulation of single-cell genome organization into TADs and chromatin nanodomains.
    Szabo Q; Donjon A; Jerković I; Papadopoulos GL; Cheutin T; Bonev B; Nora EP; Bruneau BG; Bantignies F; Cavalli G
    Nat Genet; 2020 Nov; 52(11):1151-1157. PubMed ID: 33077913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Topologically Associating Domain Callers Based on Hi-C Data.
    Liu K; Li HD; Li Y; Wang J; Wang J
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2023; 20(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 35104223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comprehensive benchmarking with interpretation and operational guidance for the hierarchy of topologically associating domains.
    Xu J; Xu X; Huang D; Luo Y; Lin L; Bai X; Zheng Y; Yang Q; Cheng Y; Huang A; Shi J; Bo X; Gu J; Chen H
    Nat Commun; 2024 May; 15(1):4376. PubMed ID: 38782890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Deciphering hierarchical organization of topologically associated domains through change-point testing.
    Xing H; Wu Y; Zhang MQ; Chen Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 22(1):183. PubMed ID: 33838653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modelling genome-wide topological associating domains in mouse embryonic stem cells.
    Zhan Y; Giorgetti L; Tiana G
    Chromosome Res; 2017 Mar; 25(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 28108933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. OnTAD: hierarchical domain structure reveals the divergence of activity among TADs and boundaries.
    An L; Yang T; Yang J; Nuebler J; Xiang G; Hardison RC; Li Q; Zhang Y
    Genome Biol; 2019 Dec; 20(1):282. PubMed ID: 31847870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. HiTAD: detecting the structural and functional hierarchies of topologically associating domains from chromatin interactions.
    Wang XT; Cui W; Peng C
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Nov; 45(19):e163. PubMed ID: 28977529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. TADs and Their Borders: Free Movement or Building a Wall?
    Chang LH; Ghosh S; Noordermeer D
    J Mol Biol; 2020 Feb; 432(3):643-652. PubMed ID: 31887284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of computational methods for the identification of topologically associating domains.
    Zufferey M; Tavernari D; Oricchio E; Ciriello G
    Genome Biol; 2018 Dec; 19(1):217. PubMed ID: 30526631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [An identification method of chromatin topological associated domains based on spatial density clustering].
    Gong H; Zhang S; Zhang X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2024 Jun; 41(3):552-559. PubMed ID: 38932542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative differences in TAD border strength underly the TAD hierarchy in Drosophila chromosomes.
    Luzhin AV; Flyamer IM; Khrameeva EE; Ulianov SV; Razin SV; Gavrilov AA
    J Cell Biochem; 2019 Mar; 120(3):4494-4503. PubMed ID: 30260021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.