180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32084198)
1. Imaging studies of bacterial biofilms on cochlear implants-Bioactive glass (BAG) inhibits mature biofilm.
Kirchhoff L; Arweiler-Harbeck D; Arnolds J; Hussain T; Hansen S; Bertram R; Buer J; Lang S; Steinmann J; Höing B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229198. PubMed ID: 32084198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bioactive Glass Granules Inhibit Mature Bacterial Biofilms on the Surfaces of Cochlear Implants.
Höing B; Kirchhoff L; Arnolds J; Hussain T; Buer J; Lang S; Arweiler-Harbeck D; Steinmann J
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e985-e991. PubMed ID: 30334871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of antibacterial bioactive glass S53P4 against S. aureus biofilms grown on titanium discs in vitro.
Coraça-Huber DC; Fille M; Hausdorfer J; Putzer D; Nogler M
J Orthop Res; 2014 Jan; 32(1):175-7. PubMed ID: 24108602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Antibiofilm agents against MDR bacterial strains: is bioactive glass BAG-S53P4 also effective?
Bortolin M; De Vecchi E; Romanò CL; Toscano M; Mattina R; Drago L
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2016 Jan; 71(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 26462989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro antibiofilm activity of bioactive glass S53P4.
Drago L; Vassena C; Fenu S; De Vecchi E; Signori V; De Francesco R; Romanò CL
Future Microbiol; 2014; 9(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 24957087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bioactive glass S53P4 eradicates
Grønseth T; Vestby LK; Nesse LL; von Unge M; Silvola JT
Ups J Med Sci; 2020 Aug; 125(3):217-225. PubMed ID: 32552165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bacterial biofilm formation on a human cochlear implant.
Pawlowski KS; Wawro D; Roland PS
Otol Neurotol; 2005 Sep; 26(5):972-5. PubMed ID: 16151345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biofilm-forming capacity of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ocular infections.
Hou W; Sun X; Wang Z; Zhang Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Aug; 53(9):5624-31. PubMed ID: 22736609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Antimicrobial effects of a bioactive glass combined with fluoride or triclosan on Streptococcus mutans biofilm.
Xu YT; Wu Q; Chen YM; Smales RJ; Shi SY; Wang MT
Arch Oral Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(7):1059-65. PubMed ID: 25951616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Air Abrasion With Bioactive Glass Eradicates
Abushahba F; Söderling E; Aalto-Setälä L; Hupa L; Närhi TO
J Oral Implantol; 2019 Dec; 45(6):444-450. PubMed ID: 31536440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Zirconium Nitride Coating Reduced Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilm Formation on Orthopaedic Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Study.
Pilz M; Staats K; Tobudic S; Assadian O; Presterl E; Windhager R; Holinka J
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Feb; 477(2):461-466. PubMed ID: 30418277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomaterials for orthopedics: anti-biofilm activity of a new bioactive glass coating on titanium implants.
Marques DM; Oliveira VC; Souza MT; Zanotto ED; Issa JPM; Watanabe E
Biofouling; 2020 Feb; 36(2):234-244. PubMed ID: 32321306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased resistance of contact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions.
Szczotka-Flynn LB; Imamura Y; Chandra J; Yu C; Mukherjee PK; Pearlman E; Ghannoum MA
Cornea; 2009 Sep; 28(8):918-26. PubMed ID: 19654521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biofilm Formation on Breast Implant Surfaces by Major Gram-Positive Bacterial Pathogens.
Rezende-Pereira G; Albuquerque JP; Souza MC; Nogueira BA; Silva MG; Hirata R; Mattos-Guaraldi AL; Duarte RS; Neves FPG
Aesthet Surg J; 2021 Sep; 41(10):1144-1151. PubMed ID: 33378420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of Chitosan-Based Surfaces to Prevent Single- and Dual-Species Biofilms of
Lima M; Teixeira-Santos R; Gomes LC; Faria SI; Valcarcel J; Vázquez JA; Cerqueira MA; Pastrana L; Bourbon AI; Mergulhão FJ
Molecules; 2021 Jul; 26(14):. PubMed ID: 34299652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevention of biofilm formation by polyquaternary polymer.
Dirain CO; Silva RC; Antonelli PJ
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Sep; 88():157-62. PubMed ID: 27497405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surface charge modification decreases Pseudomonas aeruginosa adherence in vitro and bacterial persistence in an in vivo implant model.
Kao WK; Gagnon PM; Vogel JP; Chole RA
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jul; 127(7):1655-1661. PubMed ID: 28295372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel Antibiotic-loaded Point-of-care Implant Coating Inhibits Biofilm.
Jennings JA; Carpenter DP; Troxel KS; Beenken KE; Smeltzer MS; Courtney HS; Haggard WO
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jul; 473(7):2270-82. PubMed ID: 25604874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of sonication with chemical biofilm dislodgement methods using chelating and reducing agents: Implications for the microbiological diagnosis of implant associated infection.
Karbysheva S; Di Luca M; Butini ME; Winkler T; Schütz M; Trampuz A
PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0231389. PubMed ID: 32267888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bacterial biofilms may contribute to persistent cochlear implant infection.
Antonelli PJ; Lee JC; Burne RA
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):953-7. PubMed ID: 15547425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
