258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3208479)
1. Baby Doe committees: a critical evaluation.
Mahowald MB
Clin Perinatol; 1988 Dec; 15(4):789-800. PubMed ID: 3208479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The real challenge of "Baby Doe": considering the sanctity and quality of life.
Goldworth A; Stevenson DK
Clin Pediatr (Phila); 1989 Mar; 28(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 2920487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A neonatologist looks at the baby Doe Rule: ethical decisions by edict.
Berseth CL
Pediatrics; 1983 Sep; 72(3):428-9. PubMed ID: 6889050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
Horan DJ; Balch BJ
Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
Ciulla JB
Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based ethics and the care of premature infants.
Tyson J
Future Child; 1995; 5(1):197-213. PubMed ID: 7633863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma?
Shapiro RS; Barthel R
Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it?
Clark FI
Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ethical dilemmas in the treatment of critically ill newborns.
Brooks BF
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985; 1(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 10280374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Checkmating the Baby Doe regulations.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Aug; 16(4):29-31. PubMed ID: 3744798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comments and recommendations on the "Infant Doe" proposed regulations.
Law Med Health Care; 1983 Oct; 11(5):203-9, 213. PubMed ID: 6557312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical ethics in life and death.
Thompson R
Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The decision to forgo life-sustaining treatment for seriously ill newborns.
Strain JE
Pediatrics; 1983 Oct; 72(4):572-3. PubMed ID: 6889074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Baby Doe redux: doctors as child abusers.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1983 Oct; 13(5):26-7. PubMed ID: 6643033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 'Baby Doe' rulings-review and comment.
Britton JR
West J Med; 1984 Feb; 140(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 6730486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails.
Curran M
Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life.
Wakefield-Fisher M
Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment of seriously ill and handicapped newborns.
Fost N
Crit Care Clin; 1986 Jan; 2(1):145-59. PubMed ID: 11644122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention.
Riga PJ
Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
Med World News; 1983 Jul; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
