These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32086004)

  • 1. No evidence for the reduction of task competition and attentional adjustment during task-switching practice.
    Strobach T; Wendt M; Tomat M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103036. PubMed ID: 32086004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attentional control of response selection in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1315-24. PubMed ID: 26076177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Proactive control of irrelevant task rules during cued task switching.
    Bugg JM; Braver TS
    Psychol Res; 2016 Sep; 80(5):860-76. PubMed ID: 26215433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The congruency sequence effect transfers across different response modes.
    Weissman DH; Colter K; Drake B; Morgan C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Oct; 161():86-94. PubMed ID: 26343331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Target-distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Sprengel M; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):292-301. PubMed ID: 30083838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict - controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2531-2550. PubMed ID: 33948882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intentional switching of auditory attention between long and short sequential tone patterns.
    Nolden S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May; 79(4):1132-1146. PubMed ID: 28205053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shifts in target modality cause attentional reset: Evidence from sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Willmes K; Koch I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1466-1473. PubMed ID: 26813694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Age-related deficits in the congruency sequence effect are task-specific: An investigation of nine tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Aug; 35(5):744-764. PubMed ID: 32744855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Turning distractors into targets increases the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():31-41. PubMed ID: 30408614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The contribution of response conflict, multisensory integration, and body-mediated attention to the crossmodal congruency effect.
    Marini F; Romano D; Maravita A
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Mar; 235(3):873-887. PubMed ID: 27913817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Now you see it, now you don't: controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect.
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):176-86. PubMed ID: 21745649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.
    Erb CD; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102869. PubMed ID: 31228719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Control processes through the suppression of the automatic response activation triggered by task-irrelevant information in the Simon-type tasks.
    Kim S; Lee SH; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():51-61. PubMed ID: 26479902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects.
    Wühr P; Duthoo W; Notebaert W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):779-801. PubMed ID: 25380403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect.
    Schmidt JR; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():61-8. PubMed ID: 26036421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 28752317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conflict background triggered congruency sequence effects in graphic judgment task.
    Zhao L; Wang Y
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e54780. PubMed ID: 23372766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective impairment of attentional set shifting in adults with ADHD.
    Luna-Rodriguez A; Wendt M; Kerner Auch Koerner J; Gawrilow C; Jacobsen T
    Behav Brain Funct; 2018 Nov; 14(1):18. PubMed ID: 30414619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
    Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.