142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32086114)
1. Technical considerations and mid-term follow-up after vaginal hysterocolpectomy with colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse.
Villot A; Pizzoferrato AC; Longie A; Paniel BJ; Fauconnier A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():73-79. PubMed ID: 32086114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk factors for recurrence after Le Fort colpocleisis for severe pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women.
Krissi H; Aviram A; Eitan R; From A; Wiznitzer A; Peled Y
Int J Surg; 2015 Aug; 20():75-9. PubMed ID: 26079498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term follow-up after LeFort colpocleisis: patient satisfaction, regret rate, and pelvic symptoms.
Song X; Zhu L; Ding J; Xu T; Lang J
Menopause; 2016 Jun; 23(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 26978714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pelvic Symptoms, Body Image, and Regret after LeFort Colpocleisis: A Long-Term Follow-Up.
Wang X; Chen Y; Hua K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):415-419. PubMed ID: 28027972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality of life following vaginal reconstructive versus obliterative surgery for treating advanced pelvic organ prolapse.
Petcharopas A; Wongtra-Ngan S; Chinthakanan O
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1141-1146. PubMed ID: 29379997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
De La Cruz JF; Myers EM; Geller EJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term quality of life, satisfaction, pelvic floor symptoms and regret after colpocleisis.
Katsara A; Wight E; Heinzelmann-Schwarz V; Kavvadias T
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Nov; 294(5):999-1003. PubMed ID: 27460073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term experience of vaginal vault prolapse prevention at hysterectomy time by modified McCall culdoplasty or Shull suspension: Clinical, sexual and quality of life assessment after surgical intervention.
Schiavi MC; Savone D; Di Mascio D; Di Tucci C; Perniola G; Zullo MA; Muzii L; Benedetti Panici P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Apr; 223():113-118. PubMed ID: 29518641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of perioperative conditions between total and partial colpocleisis for elderly patients suffered from severe pelvic organ prolapse].
Ju R; Yang X; Sun XL; Li XW; Zhao GJ; Wang HY; Wang JL
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):33-37. PubMed ID: 30695904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. LeFort colpocleisis for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.
Wang X; Hu C; Chen Y; Hua K
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):381-384. PubMed ID: 31069411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rouhier's colpocleisis with concomitant vaginal hysterectomy: an instructive video for female pelvic surgeons.
Constantin F; Veit-Rubin N; Ramyead L; Dubuisson J
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Mar; 30(3):495-497. PubMed ID: 30298205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Le Fort colpocleisis: An evaluation of results and quality of life at intermediate-term follow-up.
Ertas IE; Balıkoğlu M; Biler A
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 50(4):102069. PubMed ID: 33476811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term efficacy and patient satisfaction of Le Fort colpocleisis for the treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse.
Wang YT; Zhang K; Wang HF; Yang JF; Ying Y; Han JS
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):879-884. PubMed ID: 32601781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Long-term outcomes of the high vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension in treatment of the severe pelvic organ prolapse].
Lu YX; Wang J; Shen WJ; Zhang YH; Liu JX; Zhao Y; Ge J; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 24199919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of life in women of non-reproductive age with transvaginal mesh repair for pelvic organ prolapse: A cohort study.
Hüsch T; Mager R; Ober E; Bentler R; Ulm K; Haferkamp A
Int J Surg; 2016 Sep; 33 Pt A():36-41. PubMed ID: 27465100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Synthetic Graft Augmentation in Vaginal Prolapse Surgery: Long-Term Objective and Subjective Outcomes.
Meyer I; McGwin G; Swain TA; Alvarez MD; Ellington DR; Richter HE
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):614-21. PubMed ID: 26922879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term outcomes of modified high uterosacral ligament vault suspension (HUSLS) at vaginal hysterectomy.
Doumouchtsis SK; Khunda A; Jeffery ST; Franco AV; Fynes MM
Int Urogynecol J; 2011 May; 22(5):577-84. PubMed ID: 21125218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
