These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32086135)
41. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts. Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Patient literacy and the readability of written cancer educational materials. Cooley ME; Moriarty H; Berger MS; Selm-Orr D; Coyle B; Short T Oncol Nurs Forum; 1995 Oct; 22(9):1345-51. PubMed ID: 8539175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Dense Breasts: What Do Our Patients Need to Be Told and Why? Throckmorton AD; Rhodes DJ; Hughes KS; Degnim AC; Dickson-Witmer D Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3119-27. PubMed ID: 27401446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The effect of educational brochures on knowledge and emotional distress in women with abnormal Papanicolaou smears. Stewart DE; Lickrish GM; Sierra S; Parkin H Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Feb; 81(2):280-2. PubMed ID: 8423964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts. Mori M; Akashi-Tanaka S; Suzuki S; Daniels MI; Watanabe C; Hirose M; Nakamura S Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 26942415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Unsuitable readability levels of patient information pertaining to dementia and related diseases: a comparative analysis. Weih M; Reinhold A; Richter-Schmidinger T; Sulimma AK; Klein H; Kornhuber J Int Psychogeriatr; 2008 Dec; 20(6):1116-23. PubMed ID: 18588726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Readability of printed patient information for epileptic patients. Foster DR; Rhoney DH Ann Pharmacother; 2002 Dec; 36(12):1856-61. PubMed ID: 12452744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The use of illustrations and narrative text style to improve readability of a health education brochure. Michielutte R; Bahnson J; Dignan MB; Schroeder EM J Cancer Educ; 1992; 7(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 1419592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Readability statistics of patient information leaflets in a Speech and Language Therapy Department. Pothier L; Day R; Harris C; Pothier DD Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2008; 43(6):712-22. PubMed ID: 19016131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Readability and patient education materials used for low-income populations. Wilson M Clin Nurse Spec; 2009; 23(1):33-40; quiz 41-2. PubMed ID: 19098513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Influence of Anesthetic Brochure on Patient's Information Gain, Preoperative Anxiety, Trust, and Satisfaction. Li MN; Yu XR; Wang YJ; Bo MY; Huang YG Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2016 Dec; 38(6):632-636. PubMed ID: 28065227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Women's response to state-mandated language in dense breast notification. Spalluto LB; Roumie CL; Bonnett KR; Schlundt DG; DeBenedectis CM; Wilkins CH Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):1046-1050. PubMed ID: 30255589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Readability of out-patient letters copied to patients: can patients understand what is written about them? Todhunter SL; Clamp PJ; Gillett S; Pothier DD J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Mar; 124(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 19954560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Readability of pediatric health materials for preventive dental care. Hendrickson RL; Huebner CE; Riedy CA BMC Oral Health; 2006 Nov; 6():14. PubMed ID: 17109743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Getting to the point: what women newly diagnosed with breast cancer want to know about treatment-focused genetic testing. Meiser B; Gleeson M; Watts K; Peate M; Zilliacus E; Barlow-Stewart K; Saunders C; Mitchell G; Kirk J Oncol Nurs Forum; 2012 Mar; 39(2):E101-11. PubMed ID: 22374498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Supplemental Screening With Automated Breast Ultrasound in Women With Dense Breasts: Comparing Notification Methods and Screening Behaviors. Aripoli A; Fountain K; Winblad O; Gatewood J; Hill J; Wick JA; Inciardi M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):W22-W28. PubMed ID: 29045183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Does three-dimensional functional infrared imaging improve breast cancer detection based on digital mammography in women with dense breasts? Hellgren RJ; Sundbom AE; Czene K; Izhaky D; Hall P; Dickman PW Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6227-6235. PubMed ID: 31115623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of receiving a customizable brochure on breast cancer patients' knowledge about their diagnosis and treatment: A randomized clinical trial. Villarreal-Garza C; Ferrigno AS; De la Garza-Ramos C; Vazquez-Juarez D; Moreno-Jaime B; Remolina-Bonilla Y; Segura-Gonzalez M; Mariscal-Ramirez I; Perazzo F; Garnica-Jaliffe G; Neciosup-Delgado S; Conde-Flores E; Mysler S; Hernandez-Ayala A; Barajas-Sanchez A; Rios Mercado MDS; Noh-Vazquez NM; Garcia-Rodriguez R; Platas A; Tamez-Salazar J; Mireles-Aguilar T; Platas A Cancer Med; 2023 Jul; 12(14):15612-15627. PubMed ID: 37317676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]