These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32086264)

  • 1. Sizing of ballistic arm protection for the VIRTUS body armour and load carriage system.
    Breeze J; Davis JI; Fryer RN; Lewis EA
    BMJ Mil Health; 2021 Jun; 167(3):163-167. PubMed ID: 32086264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining the optimum anatomical coverage of side plates for the VIRTUS body armour and load carriage system.
    Breeze J; Fryer RN; Lewis E
    BMJ Mil Health; 2021 Jun; 167(3):147-152. PubMed ID: 32094217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determining the dimensions of essential medical coverage required by military body armour plates utilising Computed Tomography.
    Breeze J; Lewis EA; Fryer R
    Injury; 2016 Sep; 47(9):1932-8. PubMed ID: 27343133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimum depths to essential structures in a UK military population using computed tomography: application to stab-resistant body armour.
    Breeze J; Lewis EA; Mahoney PF
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Mar; 134(2):691-695. PubMed ID: 31970481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A fit and function analysis of the UK OSPREY body armour system for female users.
    Davis JI; Lewis E; Ellett JR
    BMJ Mil Health; 2023 Feb; 169(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 32098901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defining the medical coverage of ballistic protection to the pelvis and thigh.
    Lewis E; Fryer RN; Breeze J
    BMJ Mil Health; 2020 Jun; 166(3):129-134. PubMed ID: 32111679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Defining the minimum anatomical coverage required to protect the axilla and arm against penetrating ballistic projectiles.
    Breeze J; Fryer R; Lewis EA; Clasper J
    J R Army Med Corps; 2016 Aug; 162(4):270-5. PubMed ID: 26106013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using CT scans to determine the optimal sizes of hard armour plates to protect the torso for UK female Armed Forces personnel.
    Breeze J; Fryer RN; Bowley D; Gibb I; Lewis E
    BMJ Mil Health; 2023 Feb; 169(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 36657826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of ballistic impacts on batteries and the potential for injury.
    Rabbitt A; Horsfall I; Carr DJ
    BMJ Mil Health; 2020 Oct; 166(5):330-335. PubMed ID: 30803977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defining the essential anatomical coverage provided by military body armour against high energy projectiles.
    Breeze J; Lewis EA; Fryer R; Hepper AE; Mahoney PF; Clasper JC
    J R Army Med Corps; 2016 Aug; 162(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 26272950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and post mortem analysis of combat neck injury used to inform a novel coverage of armour tool.
    Breeze J; Fryer R; Hare J; Delaney R; Hunt NC; Lewis EA; Clasper JC
    Injury; 2015 Apr; 46(4):629-33. PubMed ID: 25683212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. UK military helmet design and test methods.
    Carr DJ; Lewis E; Mahoney PF
    BMJ Mil Health; 2020 Oct; 166(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 31175166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The UK VIRTUS helmet: User feedback from Operation TORAL in Afghanistan.
    Breeze J; Davis J; Coates R; Abbott C; Evans P; Lewis EA
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Sep; 119():104323. PubMed ID: 38824829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are female soldiers satisfied with the fit and function of body armour?
    Coltman CE; Steele JR; Spratford WA; Molloy RH
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Nov; 89():103197. PubMed ID: 32755739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying problems that female soldiers experience with current-issue body armour.
    Coltman CE; Brisbine BR; Molloy RH; Ball NB; Spratford WA; Steele JR
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jul; 94():103384. PubMed ID: 33690018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing the medical coverage provided by four contemporary military combat helmets against penetrating traumatic brain injury.
    Breeze J; Fryer RN; Russell J
    BMJ Mil Health; 2022 Oct; 168(5):395-398. PubMed ID: 34131065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attenuation of blast pressure behind ballistic protective vests.
    Wood GW; Panzer MB; Shridharani JK; Matthews KA; Capehart BP; Myers BS; Bass CR
    Inj Prev; 2013 Feb; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 22544830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anthropometric assessment of cervical neurovascular structures using CTA to determine zone-specific vulnerability to penetrating fragmentation injuries.
    Breeze J; West A; Clasper J
    Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 22763315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can thoraco-abdominal organ boundaries be accurately determined from X-ray and anthropometric surface scans? Implications for body armour system coverage and design.
    Coltman CE; Powell A; Laing SN; Davidson RA; Jaffrey MA; Zhou A; Pickering MR; Summers SJ
    Appl Ergon; 2024 Sep; 119():104311. PubMed ID: 38763088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of flexible body armour on pulmonary function.
    Armstrong NC; Gay LA
    Ergonomics; 2016 May; 59(5):692-6. PubMed ID: 26548548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.