These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32086548)

  • 1. Thinking Upstream: How Do Landowner Attitudes Affect Forested Riparian Buffer Coverage?
    Armstrong A; Stedman RC
    Environ Manage; 2020 May; 65(5):689-701. PubMed ID: 32086548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What's a stream without water? Disproportionality in headwater regions impacting water quality.
    Armstrong A; Stedman RC; Bishop JA; Sullivan PJ
    Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 50(5):849-60. PubMed ID: 22926239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.
    Balukas JA; Bell KP; Bauer DM
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 232():751-758. PubMed ID: 30529417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Heggenstaller E; Larkin JL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194740. PubMed ID: 29617388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The lay of the land: What we know about non-operating agricultural and absentee forest landowners in the U.S. and Europe.
    Fairchild E; Ulrich-Schad JD; Petrzelka P; Ma Z
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 313():114991. PubMed ID: 35367676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Riparian forest buffers mitigate the effects of deforestation on fish assemblages in tropical headwater streams.
    Lorion CM; Kennedy BP
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Mar; 19(2):468-79. PubMed ID: 19323203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Landowners' Socio-Cultural Valuation of Ecosystem Services Provided by Trees in Costa Rican Agricultural Landscapes.
    Leary J; Grimm K; Aslan C; Mark M; Frey S; Bath-Rosenfeld R
    Environ Manage; 2021 May; 67(5):974-987. PubMed ID: 33661346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Social and spatial relationships driving landowner attitudes towards aquatic conservation in a Piedmont-Blue Ridge landscape.
    Chambers SN; Baldwin RF; Baldwin ED; Bridges WC; Fouch N
    Heliyon; 2017 Apr; 3(4):e00288. PubMed ID: 28409186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Willingness of Non-Industrial Private Forest Owners to Enter California's Carbon Offset Market.
    Kelly EC; Gold GJ; Di Tommaso J
    Environ Manage; 2017 Nov; 60(5):882-895. PubMed ID: 28836080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Socio-psychological factors influencing intent to adopt conservation practices in the Minnesota River Basin.
    Lang Z; Rabotyagov S
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 307():114466. PubMed ID: 35078060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Regulating riparian forests for aquatic productivity in the Pacific Northwest, USA: addressing a paradox.
    Newton M; Ice G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Jan; 23(2):1149-57. PubMed ID: 26611633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach.
    Putten vI; Jennings SM; Louviere JJ; Burgess LB
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Oct; 92(10):2647-56. PubMed ID: 21719189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perpetual conservation easements and landowners: evaluating easement knowledge, satisfaction and partner organization relationships.
    Stroman DA; Kreuter UP
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():284-291. PubMed ID: 25190596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Riparian forests mitigate harmful ecological effects of agricultural diffuse pollution in medium-sized streams.
    Turunen J; Markkula J; Rajakallio M; Aroviita J
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 649():495-503. PubMed ID: 30176461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal ecotones: A comparative analysis of riparian policy protection in the Oregon Coast Range, USA.
    Boisjolie BA; Santelmann MV; Flitcroft RL; Duncan SL
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 197():206-220. PubMed ID: 28388459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do Riparian Buffers Protect Stream Invertebrate Communities in South American Atlantic Forest Agricultural Areas?
    Hunt L; Marrochi N; Bonetto C; Liess M; Buss DF; Vieira da Silva C; Chiu MC; Resh VH
    Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 60(6):1155-1170. PubMed ID: 28980050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Landowners' incentives for constructing wetlands in an agricultural area in south Sweden.
    Hansson A; Pedersen E; Weisner SE
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 113():271-8. PubMed ID: 23064246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coupled ecological-social dynamics in a forested landscape: spatial interactions and information flow.
    Satake A; Leslie HM; Iwasa Y; Levin SA
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jun; 246(4):695-707. PubMed ID: 17376488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Controls on nutrients across a prairie stream watershed: land use and riparian cover effects.
    Dodds WK; Oakes RM
    Environ Manage; 2006 May; 37(5):634-46. PubMed ID: 16485163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Young Forest Conservation Incentive Programs: Explaining Re-Enrollment and Post-program Persistence.
    Lutter SH; Dayer AA; Larkin JL
    Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 63(2):270-281. PubMed ID: 30535797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.