BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

610 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32087388)

  • 21. Assessment of bone density using the 1.5 T or 3.0 T MRI-based vertebral bone quality score in older patients undergoing spine surgery: does field strength matter?
    Lin W; He C; Xie F; Chen T; Zheng G; Yin H; Chen H; Wang Z
    Spine J; 2023 Aug; 23(8):1172-1181. PubMed ID: 37031891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cervical spine bone density in young healthy adults as a function of sex, vertebral level and anatomic location.
    Anderst WJ; West T; Donaldson WF; Lee JY
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2281-2289. PubMed ID: 28478522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. BMI and gender increase risk of sacral fractures after multilevel instrumented spinal fusion compared with bone mineral density and pelvic parameters.
    Salzmann SN; Ortiz Miller C; Carrino JA; Yang J; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Spine J; 2019 Feb; 19(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 29792998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. MRI-based Pedicle Bone Quality score: Correlation to Quantitative Computed Tomography Bone Mineral Density and its Role in Quantitative Assessment of Osteoporosis.
    Li Q; Hu B; Yang H; Yang X; Wang L; Song Y
    Spine J; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38880488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of peripheral quantitative computed tomography forearm bone density versus DXA in rheumatoid arthritis patients and controls.
    Juhász B; Gulyás K; Horváth Á; Pethő Z; Bhattoa HP; Váncsa A; Szekanecz É; Horváth C; Kocsis J; Horváth Z; Hodosi K; Szántó S; Szűcs G; Szekanecz Z
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Apr; 28(4):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 27942777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bone quality in patients with osteoporosis undergoing lumbar fusion surgery: analysis of the MRI-based vertebral bone quality score and the bone microstructure derived from microcomputed tomography.
    Haffer H; Muellner M; Chiapparelli E; Moser M; Dodo Y; Zhu J; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Spine J; 2022 Oct; 22(10):1642-1650. PubMed ID: 35675866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia diagnosed using quantitative CT in 296 consecutive lumbar fusion patients.
    Carlson BB; Salzmann SN; Shirahata T; Ortiz Miller C; Carrino JA; Yang J; Reisener MJ; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Aug; 49(2):E5. PubMed ID: 32738803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance of iCare quantitative computed tomography in bone mineral density assessment of the hip and vertebral bodies in European spine phantom.
    Liu F; Zhu H; Ma J; Miao L; Chen S; Yin Z; Wang H
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2023 Oct; 18(1):777. PubMed ID: 37845720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of anthropometric parameters and bone size on bone mineral density using volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry at the hip.
    Guglielmi G; van Kuijk C; Li J; Meta MD; Scillitani A; Lang TF
    Acta Radiol; 2006 Jul; 47(6):574-80. PubMed ID: 16875335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Regional variations in C1-C2 bone density on quantitated computed tomography and clinical implications.
    Baisden JL; Varghese V; Banerjee A; Yoganandan N
    N Am Spine Soc J; 2023 Jun; 14():100228. PubMed ID: 37440985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of spinal degenerative changes on volumetric bone mineral density of the central skeleton as measured by quantitative computed tomography.
    Guglielmi G; Floriani I; Torri V; Li J; van Kuijk C; Genant HK; Lang TF
    Acta Radiol; 2005 May; 46(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 15981723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quantitative computed tomography discriminates between postmenopausal women with low spine bone mineral density with vertebral fractures and those with low spine bone mineral density only: the SHATTER study.
    Paggiosi MA; Debono M; Walsh JS; Peel NFA; Eastell R
    Osteoporos Int; 2020 Apr; 31(4):667-675. PubMed ID: 31993717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) of the forearm using general purpose spiral whole-body CT scanners: accuracy, precision and comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).
    Engelke K; Libanati C; Liu Y; Wang H; Austin M; Fuerst T; Stampa B; Timm W; Genant HK
    Bone; 2009 Jul; 45(1):110-8. PubMed ID: 19345291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Vertebral bone density evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in vitro.
    Ebbesen EN; Thomsen JS; Beck-Nielsen H; Nepper-Rasmussen HJ; Mosekilde L
    Bone; 1998 Sep; 23(3):283-90. PubMed ID: 9737351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative computed tomography in the evaluation of spinal osteoporosis following spinal cord injury.
    Liu CC; Theodorou DJ; Theodorou SJ; Andre MP; Sartoris DJ; Szollar SM; Martin EM; Deftos LJ
    Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(10):889-96. PubMed ID: 11199194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trabecular bone mineral density measurement using thoracic and lumbar quantitative computed tomography.
    Budoff MJ; Khairallah W; Li D; Gao YL; Ismaeel H; Flores F; Child J; Carson S; Mao SS
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 22112461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging screening for a surgical decision regarding the approach for anterior spine fusion at the cervicothoracic junction.
    Fraser JF; Diwan AD; Peterson M; O'Brien MF; Mintz DN; Khan SN; Sandhu HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Apr; 27(7):675-81. PubMed ID: 11923658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The association between lower Hounsfield units on computed tomography and cage subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
    Xi Z; Mummaneni PV; Wang M; Ruan H; Burch S; Deviren V; Clark AJ; Berven SH; Chou D
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Aug; 49(2):E8. PubMed ID: 32738801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
    Grampp S; Genant HK; Mathur A; Lang P; Jergas M; Takada M; Glüer CC; Lu Y; Chavez M
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Trabecular volumetric bone mineral density of the occipital bone at preferred screw placement sites measured by quantitative computed tomography.
    Moser M; Adl Amini D; Okano I; Oezel L; Shue J; Carrino JA; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
    J Orthop Res; 2022 Aug; 40(8):1909-1917. PubMed ID: 34862648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.