610 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32087388)
41. Endplate volumetric bone mineral density is a predictor for cage subsidence following lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a risk factor analysis.
Jones C; Okano I; Salzmann SN; Reisener MJ; Chiapparelli E; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
Spine J; 2021 Oct; 21(10):1729-1737. PubMed ID: 33716124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Osteoporosis in acute fractures of the cervical spine: the role of opportunistic CT screening.
Emohare O; Dittmer A; Morgan RA; Switzer JA; Polly DW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Jul; 23(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25860516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of anterior cervical fusion after two-level discectomy or single-level corpectomy: sagittal alignment, cervical lordosis, graft collapse, and adjacent-level ossification.
Park Y; Maeda T; Cho W; Riew KD
Spine J; 2010 Mar; 10(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 19850532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Quantitative computed tomographic evaluation of bone mineral density in beagle dogs: comparison with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry as a gold standard.
Kwon D; Kim J; Lee H; Kim B; Han H; Oh H; Kim M; Yoon H; Lee B; Eom K
J Vet Med Sci; 2018 Apr; 80(4):620-628. PubMed ID: 29415919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Postoperative decrease of regional volumetric bone mineral density measured by quantitative computed tomography after lumbar fusion surgery in adjacent vertebrae.
Okano I; Jones C; Salzmann SN; Miller CO; Shirahata T; Rentenberger C; Shue J; Carrino JA; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
Osteoporos Int; 2020 Jun; 31(6):1163-1171. PubMed ID: 32170396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Simultaneous screening for osteoporosis at CT colonography: bone mineral density assessment using MDCT attenuation techniques compared with the DXA reference standard.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee LJ; del Rio AM; Lauder T; Bruce RJ; Summers RM; Pooler BD; Binkley N
J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Sep; 26(9):2194-203. PubMed ID: 21590738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Prediction of vertebral strength in vitro by spinal bone densitometry and calcaneal ultrasound.
Cheng XG; Nicholson PH; Boonen S; Lowet G; Brys P; Aerssens J; Van der Perre G; Dequeker J
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Oct; 12(10):1721-8. PubMed ID: 9333134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?
Samartzis D; Shen FH; Lyon C; Phillips M; Goldberg EJ; An HS
Spine J; 2004; 4(6):636-43. PubMed ID: 15541695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Quantitative computed tomography of the lumbar spine, not dual x-ray absorptiometry, is an independent predictor of prevalent vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteopenia receiving long-term glucocorticoid and hormone-replacement therapy.
Rehman Q; Lang T; Modin G; Lane NE
Arthritis Rheum; 2002 May; 46(5):1292-7. PubMed ID: 12115236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Lumbar computed tomography scans are not appropriate surrogates for bone mineral density scans in primary adult spinal deformity.
Kohan EM; Nemani VM; Hershman S; Kang DG; Kelly MP
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E4. PubMed ID: 29191096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Opportunistic QCT Bone Mineral Density Measurements Predicting Osteoporotic Fractures: A Use Case in a Prospective Clinical Cohort.
Leonhardt Y; May P; Gordijenko O; Koeppen-Ursic VA; Brandhorst H; Zimmer C; Makowski MR; Baum T; Kirschke JS; Gersing AS; Seifert-Klauss V; Schwaiger BJ
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():586352. PubMed ID: 33240220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Investigating comparability of quantitative computed tomography with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in assessing bone mineral density of patients with chronic spinal cord injury.
Haghighat Khah HR; Moradi N; Taheri T; Sanei Taheri M; Rayegani SM
Spinal Cord; 2018 May; 56(5):487-493. PubMed ID: 29277840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative dual-energy CT-based bone mineral density assessment in comparison to Hounsfield unit measurements using dual x-ray absorptiometry as standard of reference.
Booz C; Noeske J; Albrecht MH; Lenga L; Martin SS; Yel I; Huizinga NA; Vogl TJ; Wichmann JL
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109321. PubMed ID: 33017775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Use of routine thoracic and abdominal computed tomography scans for assessing bone mineral density and detecting osteoporosis.
Marinova M; Edon B; Wolter K; Katsimbari B; Schild HH; Strunk HM
Curr Med Res Opin; 2015; 31(10):1871-81. PubMed ID: 26308674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The relationship between bone mineral density, vertebral body shape and spinal curvature in the elderly thoracolumbar spine: an in vitro study.
Edmondston SJ; Singer KP; Price RI; Day RE; Breidahl PD
Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):969-75. PubMed ID: 8000841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Improved prediction of incident vertebral fractures using opportunistic QCT compared to DXA.
Löffler MT; Jacob A; Valentinitsch A; Rienmüller A; Zimmer C; Ryang YM; Baum T; Kirschke JS
Eur Radiol; 2019 Sep; 29(9):4980-4989. PubMed ID: 30790025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures.
Lang TF; Guglielmi G; van Kuijk C; De Serio A; Cammisa M; Genant HK
Bone; 2002 Jan; 30(1):247-50. PubMed ID: 11792593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Does Preoperative Bone Mineral Density Impact Fusion Success in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery? A Prospective Cohort Study.
Pinter ZW; Monsef JB; Salmons HI; Sebastian AS; Freedman BA; Currier BL; Elder BD; Nassr AN
World Neurosurg; 2022 Aug; 164():e830-e834. PubMed ID: 35605943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Utilizing machine learning for opportunistic screening for low BMD using CT scans of the cervical spine.
Sebro R; De la Garza-Ramos C
J Neuroradiol; 2023 May; 50(3):293-301. PubMed ID: 36030924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.
Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake K; Lucke M; Schröder R; Mittlmeier T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(9):1028-37. PubMed ID: 11337621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
