250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32087440)
1. Explore the relationship between fish community and environmental factors by machine learning techniques.
Hu JH; Tsai WP; Cheng ST; Chang FJ
Environ Res; 2020 May; 184():109262. PubMed ID: 32087440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A data-mining framework for exploring the multi-relation between fish species and water quality through self-organizing map.
Tsai WP; Huang SP; Cheng ST; Shao KT; Chang FJ
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Feb; 579():474-483. PubMed ID: 27866743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modeling daily water temperature for rivers: comparison between adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems and artificial neural networks models.
Zhu S; Heddam S; Nyarko EK; Hadzima-Nyarko M; Piccolroaz S; Wu S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Jan; 26(1):402-420. PubMed ID: 30406582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the natural and anthropogenic influences on basin-wide fish species richness.
Cheng ST; Herricks EE; Tsai WP; Chang FJ
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 572():825-836. PubMed ID: 27592326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional diversity measures revealed impacts of non-native species and habitat degradation on species-poor freshwater fish assemblages.
Colin N; Villéger S; Wilkes M; de Sostoa A; Maceda-Veiga A
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 625():861-871. PubMed ID: 29306829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of the five-day biochemical oxygen demand and chemical oxygen demand in natural streams using machine learning methods.
Najafzadeh M; Ghaemi A
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 May; 191(6):380. PubMed ID: 31104155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ability of machine learning models to identify preferred habitat traits of a small indigenous fish (Chanda nama) in a large river of peninsular India.
Raman RK; Das AK; Manna RK; Sahu SK; Das BK
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):16499-16509. PubMed ID: 36184703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Extended Water-Level Drawdowns in Dammed Rivers Enhance Fish Habitat: Environmental Pool Management in the Upper Mississippi River.
Coulter AA; Adams SR; Flinn MB; Whiles MR; Burr BM; Sheehan RJ; Garvey JE
Environ Manage; 2019 Jan; 63(1):124-135. PubMed ID: 30430222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ecohydrological model parameter selection for stream health evaluation.
Woznicki SA; Nejadhashemi AP; Ross DM; Zhang Z; Wang L; Esfahanian AH
Sci Total Environ; 2015 Apr; 511():341-53. PubMed ID: 25553548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of Machine Learning for eutrophication analysis and algal bloom prediction in an urban river: A 10-year study of the Han River, South Korea.
Ly QV; Nguyen XC; Lê NC; Truong TD; Hoang TT; Park TJ; Maqbool T; Pyo J; Cho KH; Lee KS; Hur J
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Nov; 797():149040. PubMed ID: 34311376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dry season habitat use of fishes in an Australian tropical river.
Keller K; Allsop Q; Brim Box J; Buckle D; Crook DA; Douglas MM; Jackson S; Kennard MJ; Luiz OJ; Pusey BJ; Townsend SA; King AJ
Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5677. PubMed ID: 30952875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Exploring fish assemblage structure, feeding guild, and water quality in a typical river-reservoir interface of tropical large reservoir environment, Central India.
Koushlesh SK; Johnson C; Sarkar UK; Das AK; Das BK; Lianthuamluaia L; Puthiyottil M; Naskar BK
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(1):2179-2204. PubMed ID: 35930149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of river ecosystem models for Flemish watercourses: case studies in the Zwalm river basin.
Goethals P; Dedecker A; Raes N; Adriaenssens V; Gabriels W; De Pauw N
Meded Rijksuniv Gent Fak Landbouwkd Toegep Biol Wet; 2001; 66(1):71-86. PubMed ID: 15952431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Importance of Natural and Anthropogenic Environmental Factors to Fish Communities of the Fox River in Illinois.
Schnier S; Cai X; Cao Y
Environ Manage; 2016 Feb; 57(2):389-411. PubMed ID: 26404430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of arsenic concentration in stream water using neuro fuzzy networks with factor analysis.
Chang FJ; Chung CH; Chen PA; Liu CW; Coynel A; Vachaud G
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Oct; 494-495():202-10. PubMed ID: 25046611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. River network connectivity and fish diversity.
Shao X; Fang Y; Jawitz JW; Yan J; Cui B
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 689():21-30. PubMed ID: 31260896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of biochemical oxygen demand at the upstream catchment of a reservoir using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system.
Chiu YC; Chiang CW; Lee TY
Water Sci Technol; 2017 Oct; 76(7-8):1739-1753. PubMed ID: 28991790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of the target fish community model to an urban river system.
Meixler MS
J Environ Manage; 2011 Apr; 92(4):1138-47. PubMed ID: 21216519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An integrated simulation-optimization framework for assessing environmental flows in rivers.
Sedighkia M; Badrzadeh N; Fathi Z; Abdoli A; Datta B
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Jan; 195(2):292. PubMed ID: 36633701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modeling the ecological status response of rivers to multiple stressors using machine learning: A comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and morphological data.
Fan J; Wang S; Li H; Yan Z; Zhang Y; Zheng X; Wang P
Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116004. PubMed ID: 32622231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
