These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32087710)

  • 1. Associations between utilization rates and patients' health: a study of spine surgery and patient-reported outcomes (EQ-5D and ODI).
    Rudolfsen JH; Solberg TK; Ingebrigtsen T; Olsen JA
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2020 Feb; 20(1):135. PubMed ID: 32087710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Werner DAT; Grotle M; Gulati S; Austevoll IM; Lønne G; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2650-2659. PubMed ID: 28616747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of the Oswestry Disability Index score equivalent to a "satisfactory symptom state" in patients undergoing surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine-a Spine Tango registry-based study.
    van Hooff ML; Mannion AF; Staub LP; Ostelo RW; Fairbank JC
    Spine J; 2016 Oct; 16(10):1221-1230. PubMed ID: 27343730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient-reported outcomes 3 months after spine surgery: is it an accurate predictor of 12-month outcome in real-world registry platforms?
    Parker SL; Asher AL; Godil SS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E17. PubMed ID: 26621415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Regional Variance in Disability and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Surgery for Grade I Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Quality Outcomes Database Analysis.
    Sherrod BA; Mummaneni PV; Alvi MA; Chan AK; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Bisson EF
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Jun; 138():e336-e344. PubMed ID: 32113995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lumbar spinal stenosis: comparison of surgical practice variation and clinical outcome in three national spine registries.
    Lønne G; Fritzell P; Hägg O; Nordvall D; Gerdhem P; Lagerbäck T; Andersen M; Eiskjaer S; Gehrchen M; Jacobs W; van Hooff ML; Solberg TK
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 29792994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Feb; 30(2):234-241. PubMed ID: 30544348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient-reported outcomes after lumbar epidural steroid injection for degenerative spine disease in depressed versus non-depressed patients.
    Kim EJ; Chotai S; Stonko DP; Wick JB; Schneider BJ; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27777051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of lumbar surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Glassman SD; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):2885-91. PubMed ID: 24768731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gender differences in degenerative spine surgery: Do female patients really fare worse?
    Siccoli A; Staartjes VE; de Wispelaere MP; Schröder ML
    Eur Spine J; 2018 Oct; 27(10):2427-2435. PubMed ID: 30132176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should the EuroQol-Five Dimensions Replace the Oswestry Disability Index When Tracking Lumbar Tubular Microdecompression Outcomes?
    Knio ZO; VanHorn TA; O'Gara TJ
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Feb; 134():e566-e571. PubMed ID: 31678442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of hand grip strength on surgical outcomes after surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary result.
    Shen F; Kim HJ; Lee NK; Chun HJ; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2018-2024. PubMed ID: 29679727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.
    Asher AL; Chotai S; Devin CJ; Speroff T; Harrell FE; Nian H; Dittus RS; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Glassman SD; Bydon M; Archer KR; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 26989974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-reported outcome scores underestimate the impact of major complications in patients undergoing spine surgery for degenerative conditions.
    Gvozdyev BV; Carreon LY; Graves CM; Riley SA; McGraw KE; Head RJ; Dimar JR; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 28753065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 2. Predictive model for return to work after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Asher AL; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Parker SL; Bydon M; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):370-381. PubMed ID: 28498069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Hermansen E; Romild UK; Austevoll IM; Solberg T; Storheim K; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):420-427. PubMed ID: 27262561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Devin CJ; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 Sep; 13(9):1006-12. PubMed ID: 23685216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Chan AY; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E3. PubMed ID: 29290130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.