These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32087937)

  • 1. Femoral transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation as alternative strategy for failed aortic bioprostheses: A single-centre experience with long-term follow-up.
    Stankowski T; Aboul-Hassan SS; Seifi Zinab F; Herwig V; Stępiński P; Grimmig O; Just S; Harnath A; Muehle A; Fritzsche D; Perek B
    Int J Cardiol; 2020 May; 306():25-34. PubMed ID: 32087937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transcatheter ViV Versus Redo Surgical AVR for the Management of Failed Biological Prosthesis: Early and Late Outcomes in a Propensity-Matched Cohort.
    Tam DY; Dharma C; Rocha RV; Ouzounian M; Wijeysundera HC; Austin PC; Chikwe J; Gaudino M; Fremes SE
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar; 13(6):765-774. PubMed ID: 31954671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tam DY; Vo TX; Wijeysundera HC; Dvir D; Friedrich JO; Fremes SE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):1404-1411. PubMed ID: 30024102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Redo-aortic valve replacement in prior stentless prosthetic aortic valves: Transcatheter versus surgical approach.
    Choi CH; Cao K; Malaver D; Kincaid EH; Lata A; Kon N; Belford PM; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):181-192. PubMed ID: 34402588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve.
    Saleem S; Ullah W; Syed MA; Megaly M; Thalambedu N; Younas S; Zahid S; Alam M; Virani SS; Verma DR; Abdul-Waheed M; Fischman DL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):940-947. PubMed ID: 34110684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with failed aortic bioprostheses.
    Silaschi M; Wendler O; Seiffert M; Castro L; Lubos E; Schirmer J; Blankenberg S; Reichenspurner H; Schäfer U; Treede H; MacCarthy P; Conradi L
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 24(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 27624351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerative Stentless Versus Stented Bioprostheses.
    Duncan A; Moat N; Simonato M; de Weger A; Kempfert J; Eggebrecht H; Walton A; Hellig F; Kornowski R; Spargias K; Mendiz O; Makkar R; Guerrero M; Rihal C; George I; Don C; Iadanza A; Bapat V; Welsh R; Wijeysundera HC; Wood D; Sathananthan J; Danenberg H; Maisano F; Garcia S; Gafoor S; Nombela-Franco L; Cobiella J; Dvir D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(13):1256-1263. PubMed ID: 31202944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative performance of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation versus conventional surgical redo aortic valve replacement in patients with degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Gozdek M; Raffa GM; Suwalski P; Kolodziejczak M; Anisimowicz L; Kubica J; Navarese EP; Kowalewski M;
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Mar; 53(3):495-504. PubMed ID: 29029105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interventional versus Surgical Treatment of Degenerated Freestyle Prosthesis.
    Fedorov D; Bauernschmitt R; Grunebaum JP; Bauer S; Sodian R; von Hodenberg E
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2024 Apr; 72(3):188-196. PubMed ID: 36858066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implications of Concomitant Tricuspid Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Bioprosthesis: Insights From the PARTNER 2 Aortic Valve-in-Valve Registry.
    Sathananthan J; Murdoch DJ; Lindman BR; Zajarias A; Jaber WA; Cremer P; Wood D; Moss R; Cheung A; Ye J; Hahn RT; Crowley A; Leon MB; Mack MJ; Webb JG
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jun; 11(12):1154-1160. PubMed ID: 29929637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Implantation Versus Redo Aortic Valve Surgery for Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Dysfunction.
    Neupane S; Singh H; Lämmer J; Othman H; Yamasaki H; Rosman HS; Bossone E; Mehta RH; Eggebrecht H
    Am J Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 121(12):1593-1600. PubMed ID: 29776652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early Outcomes for Valve-in-valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Degenerative Freestyle Bioprostheses.
    Sang SLW; Beute T; Heiser J; Berkompas D; Fanning J; Merhi W
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Autumn; 30(3):262-268. PubMed ID: 29158054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Raschpichler M; de Waha S; Holzhey D; Schwarzer G; Flint N; Kaewkes D; Bräuchle PT; Dvir D; Makkar R; Ailawadi G; Abdel-Wahab M; Thiele H; Borger MA
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Dec; 11(24):e7965. PubMed ID: 36533610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Valve-in-Valve TAVR versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Early Outcomes.
    Cizmic A; Kuhn E; Eghbalzadeh K; Weber C; Rahmanian PB; Adam M; Mauri V; Rudolph T; Baldus S; Wahlers T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Mar; 71(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 34521136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in failed stentless bioprostheses.
    Huczek Z; Grodecki K; Scisło P; Wilczek K; Jagielak D; Fil W; Kubler P; Olszówka P; Dąbrowski M; Frank M; Grygier M; Kidawa M; Wilimski R; Żelazowska K; Witkowski A; Kochman J; Zembala M; Opolski G; Dvir D; Wojakowski W
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):861-869. PubMed ID: 30009390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-analysis of Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Takagi H; Mitta S; Ando T
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2019 Jun; 67(4):243-250. PubMed ID: 30114716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Redo procedures for degenerated stentless aortic xenografts and the role of valve-in-valve transcatheter techniques.
    Grubitzsch H; Zobel S; Christ T; Holinski S; Stangl K; Treskatsch S; Falk V; Laule M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2017 Apr; 51(4):653-659. PubMed ID: 28062549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation for failed surgical bioprosthetic valves. A minimalist approach without contrast aortography or echocardiographic guidance.
    Attinger-Toller A; Htun NM; Murdoch D; Perlman GY; Alenezi A; Sathananthan J; Blanke P; Leipsic J; Thompson C; Ye J; Cheung A; Wood D; Webb JG
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 95(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 31038290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Implantation Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Malik AH; Yandrapalli S; Zaid S; Shetty SS; Aronow WS; Ahmad H; Tang GHL
    Am J Cardiol; 2020 May; 125(9):1378-1384. PubMed ID: 32139158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.