These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Modern methods for determining the positive surgical margin during radical prostatectomy]. Byadretdinov IS; Kotov SV Urologiia; 2023 Mar; (1):106-113. PubMed ID: 37401692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Caseload Volume on Oncological and Nononcological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer. Van den Broeck T; Oprea-Lager D; Moris L; Kailavasan M; Briers E; Cornford P; De Santis M; Gandaglia G; Gillessen Sommer S; Grummet JP; Grivas N; Lam TBL; Lardas M; Liew M; Mason M; O'Hanlon S; Pecanka J; Ploussard G; Rouviere O; Schoots IG; Tilki D; van den Bergh RCN; van der Poel H; Wiegel T; Willemse PP; Yuan CY; Mottet N Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):531-545. PubMed ID: 33962808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atlas of Ex Vivo Prostate Tissue and Cancer Images Using Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy: A Project for Intraoperative Positive Surgical Margin Detection During Radical Prostatectomy. Panarello D; Compérat E; Seyde O; Colau A; Terrone C; Guillonneau B Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):941-958. PubMed ID: 30683530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confocal laser microscopy for assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy. Baas DJH; Vreuls W; Sedelaar JPM; Vrijhof HJEJ; Hoekstra RJ; Zomer SF; van Leenders GJLH; van Basten JA; Somford DM BJU Int; 2023 Jul; 132(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 36440864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update. Yossepowitch O; Briganti A; Eastham JA; Epstein J; Graefen M; Montironi R; Touijer K Eur Urol; 2014 Feb; 65(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 23932439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ex vivo MRI evaluation of prostate cancer: Localization and margin status prediction of prostate cancer in fresh radical prostatectomy specimens. Heidkamp J; Hoogenboom M; Kovacs IE; Veltien A; Maat A; Sedelaar JPM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Fütterer JJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 47(2):439-448. PubMed ID: 28580659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does Gleason score of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence and oncological outcomes? Protocol for systematic review. John A; O'Callaghan M; Catterwell R; Selth L BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e034612. PubMed ID: 32209629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identification of patients at risk for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with intra-operative frozen section. Tully KH; Schulmeyer M; Hanske J; Reike MJ; Brock M; Moritz R; Jütte H; Tannapfel A; von Bodman C; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ; Roghmann F BJU Int; 2021 Nov; 128(5):598-606. PubMed ID: 33961328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Practice Patterns of Korean Urologists Regarding Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy: a Survey and Narrative Review. Ryu JH; Kim YB; Jung TY; Ko WJ; Kim SI; Kwon D; Kim DY; Oh TH; Yoo TK J Korean Med Sci; 2021 Oct; 36(41):e256. PubMed ID: 34697927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]