These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32088139)

  • 1. State-of-the-art Intraoperative Imaging Technologies for Prostate Margin Assessment: A Systematic Review.
    Olde Heuvel J; de Wit-van der Veen BJ; Huizing DMV; van der Poel HG; van Leeuwen PJ; Bhairosing PA; Stokkel MPM; Slump CH
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):733-741. PubMed ID: 32088139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Positive surgical margin during radical prostatectomy: overview of sampling methods for frozen sections and techniques for the secondary resection of the neurovascular bundles.
    Sighinolfi MC; Eissa A; Spandri V; Puliatti S; Micali S; Reggiani Bonetti L; Bertoni L; Bianchi G; Rocco B
    BJU Int; 2020 May; 125(5):656-663. PubMed ID: 32012426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.
    Wadhwa H; Terris MK; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ; Abern MR
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2016 Dec; 19(4):423-428. PubMed ID: 27698440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoperative Frozen Section for Margin Evaluation During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.
    Dinneen EP; Van Der Slot M; Adasonla K; Tan J; Grierson J; Haider A; Freeman A; Oakley N; Shaw G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Jul; 6(4):664-673. PubMed ID: 31787570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic review of nerve-sparing surgery for high-risk prostate cancer.
    Morozov A; Barret E; Veneziano D; Grigoryan V; Salomon G; Fokin I; Taratkin M; Poddubskaya E; Gomez Rivas J; Puliatti S; Okhunov Z; Cacciamani GE; Checcucci E; Marenco Jiménez JL; Enikeev D;
    Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2021 Jun; 73(3):283-291. PubMed ID: 33439578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(27):1-118. PubMed ID: 23074405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Modern methods for determining the positive surgical margin during radical prostatectomy].
    Byadretdinov IS; Kotov SV
    Urologiia; 2023 Mar; (1):106-113. PubMed ID: 37401692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraoperative
    Darr C; Harke NN; Radtke JP; Yirga L; Kesch C; Grootendorst MR; Fendler WP; Costa PF; Rischpler C; Praus C; Haubold J; Reis H; Hager T; Herrmann K; Binse I; Hadaschik B
    J Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 61(10):1500-1506. PubMed ID: 32060212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Systematic Review of the Impact of Surgeon and Hospital Caseload Volume on Oncological and Nononcological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer.
    Van den Broeck T; Oprea-Lager D; Moris L; Kailavasan M; Briers E; Cornford P; De Santis M; Gandaglia G; Gillessen Sommer S; Grummet JP; Grivas N; Lam TBL; Lardas M; Liew M; Mason M; O'Hanlon S; Pecanka J; Ploussard G; Rouviere O; Schoots IG; Tilki D; van den Bergh RCN; van der Poel H; Wiegel T; Willemse PP; Yuan CY; Mottet N
    Eur Urol; 2021 Nov; 80(5):531-545. PubMed ID: 33962808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Atlas of Ex Vivo Prostate Tissue and Cancer Images Using Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy: A Project for Intraoperative Positive Surgical Margin Detection During Radical Prostatectomy.
    Panarello D; Compérat E; Seyde O; Colau A; Terrone C; Guillonneau B
    Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):941-958. PubMed ID: 30683530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Confocal laser microscopy for assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy.
    Baas DJH; Vreuls W; Sedelaar JPM; Vrijhof HJEJ; Hoekstra RJ; Zomer SF; van Leenders GJLH; van Basten JA; Somford DM
    BJU Int; 2023 Jul; 132(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 36440864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Real-time" Assessment of Surgical Margins During Radical Prostatectomy: State-of-the-Art.
    Eissa A; Zoeir A; Sighinolfi MC; Puliatti S; Bevilacqua L; Del Prete C; Bertoni L; Azzoni P; Reggiani Bonetti L; Micali S; Bianchi G; Rocco B
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Apr; 18(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 31784282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.
    Martini A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Scuderi S; Bravi CA; Mazzone E; Stabile A; Scarcella S; Robesti D; Barletta F; Cucchiara V; Mirone V; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 31411971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and contemporary update.
    Yossepowitch O; Briganti A; Eastham JA; Epstein J; Graefen M; Montironi R; Touijer K
    Eur Urol; 2014 Feb; 65(2):303-13. PubMed ID: 23932439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ex vivo MRI evaluation of prostate cancer: Localization and margin status prediction of prostate cancer in fresh radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Heidkamp J; Hoogenboom M; Kovacs IE; Veltien A; Maat A; Sedelaar JPM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Fütterer JJ
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 47(2):439-448. PubMed ID: 28580659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does Gleason score of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy affect biochemical recurrence and oncological outcomes? Protocol for systematic review.
    John A; O'Callaghan M; Catterwell R; Selth L
    BMJ Open; 2020 Mar; 10(3):e034612. PubMed ID: 32209629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of patients at risk for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with intra-operative frozen section.
    Tully KH; Schulmeyer M; Hanske J; Reike MJ; Brock M; Moritz R; Jütte H; Tannapfel A; von Bodman C; Noldus J; Palisaar RJ; Roghmann F
    BJU Int; 2021 Nov; 128(5):598-606. PubMed ID: 33961328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
    Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
    BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Practice Patterns of Korean Urologists Regarding Positive Surgical Margins after Radical Prostatectomy: a Survey and Narrative Review.
    Ryu JH; Kim YB; Jung TY; Ko WJ; Kim SI; Kwon D; Kim DY; Oh TH; Yoo TK
    J Korean Med Sci; 2021 Oct; 36(41):e256. PubMed ID: 34697927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radical prostatectomy: positive surgical margins matter.
    Meeks JJ; Eastham JA
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):974-9. PubMed ID: 22244265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.