348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32088739)
1. Pattern-based vs. score-based guidelines using ultrasound features have different strengths in risk stratification of thyroid nodules.
Yoon JH; Lee HS; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Park VY; Kwak JY
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3793-3802. PubMed ID: 32088739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study.
Qi Q; Zhou A; Guo S; Huang X; Chen S; Li Y; Xu P
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():763897. PubMed ID: 34777258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the categorization method on the diagnostic performance of ultrasound risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules.
Fu C; Cui Y; Li J; Yu J; Wang Y; Si C; Cui K
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1073891. PubMed ID: 37182157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of diagnostic performance of the ACR and Kwak TIRADS applying the ACR TIRADS' size thresholds for FNA.
Huh S; Yoon JH; Lee HS; Moon HJ; Park VY; Kwak JY
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5243-5250. PubMed ID: 33449191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison and preliminary discussion of the reasons for the differences in diagnostic performance and unnecessary FNA biopsies between the ACR TIRADS and 2015 ATA guidelines.
Wu XL; Du JR; Wang H; Jin CX; Sui GQ; Yang DY; Lin YQ; Luo Q; Fu P; Li HQ; Teng DK
Endocrine; 2019 Jul; 65(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 30830584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison among TIRADS (ACR TI-RADS and KWAK- TI-RADS) and 2015 ATA Guidelines in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules.
Gao L; Xi X; Jiang Y; Yang X; Wang Y; Zhu S; Lai X; Zhang X; Zhao R; Zhang B
Endocrine; 2019 Apr; 64(1):90-96. PubMed ID: 30659427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound Patterns by K-TIRADS and 2015 ATA Guidelines in Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules and Follicular Lesions of Undetermined Significance.
Hong HS; Lee JY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):444-450. PubMed ID: 31039023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Malignancy risk of initially benign thyroid nodules: validation with various Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System guidelines.
Ha SM; Baek JH; Choi YJ; Chung SR; Sung TY; Kim TY; Lee JH
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):133-140. PubMed ID: 29922926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utility of Six Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems in the Diagnosis of AUS/FLUS Thyroid Nodules.
Li Q; Yang L; Yang L; Jiang X; Li S
Acad Radiol; 2024 Jan; 31(1):131-141. PubMed ID: 37225530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Thyroid Nodules: Suitability and Risk Factors.
Lee SB; Cho YJ; Lee S; Choi YH; Cheon JE; Kim WS
Thyroid; 2021 Oct; 31(10):1472-1480. PubMed ID: 33832344
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytology-Ultrasonography Risk-Stratification Scoring System Based on Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and the Korean-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System.
Hong MJ; Na DG; Baek JH; Sung JY; Kim JH
Thyroid; 2017 Jul; 27(7):953-959. PubMed ID: 28463597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based Risk-Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: Comparison of the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines with the 2016 Korean Thyroid Association/Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology and 2017 American College of Radiology Guidelines.
Ha EJ; Na DG; Moon WJ; Lee YH; Choi N
Thyroid; 2018 Nov; 28(11):1532-1537. PubMed ID: 30311862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-Marked Hypoechogenic Nodules: Multicenter Study on the Thyroid Malignancy Risk Stratification and Accuracy Based on TIRADS Systems Comparison.
Prieditis P; Radzina M; Mikijanska M; Liepa M; Stepanovs K; Grani G; Durante C; Lamartina L; Trimboli P; Cantisani V
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Feb; 58(2):. PubMed ID: 35208581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective comparison of ACR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS in thyroid nodule assessment for FNA-US.
Eidt LB; Nunes de Oliveira C; Lagos YBB; Solera GLM; Izquierdo R; Meyer ELS; Mattevi VS; Golbert L
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2023 Mar; 98(3):415-425. PubMed ID: 35864563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interrater Reliability of Various Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) Classifications for Differentiating Benign from Malignant Thyroid Nodules.
Phuttharak W; Boonrod A; Klungboonkrong V; Witsawapaisan T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Apr; 20(4):1283-1288. PubMed ID: 31031222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic and therapeutic performances of three score-based Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems after application of equal size thresholds.
Si CF; Fu C; Cui YY; Li J; Huang YJ; Cui KF
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Apr; 13(4):2109-2118. PubMed ID: 37064344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison Between Fine Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules: Effective Indications According to US Findings.
Hahn SY; Shin JH; Oh YL; Park KW; Lim Y
Sci Rep; 2020 Mar; 10(1):4969. PubMed ID: 32188891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparisons of ACR TI-RADS, ATA guidelines, Kwak TI-RADS, and KTA/KSThR guidelines in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules.
Zhang WB; Xu HX; Zhang YF; Guo LH; Xu SH; Zhao CK; Liu BJ
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2020; 75(2):219-232. PubMed ID: 31929154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Different Risk-Stratification Systems for the Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules.
Shen Y; Liu M; He J; Wu S; Chen M; Wan Y; Gao L; Cai X; Ding J; Fu X
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():378. PubMed ID: 31139568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Diagnostic performances and interobserver agreement according to observer experience: a comparison study using three guidelines for management of thyroid nodules.
Koh J; Kim SY; Lee HS; Kim EK; Kwak JY; Moon HJ; Yoon JH
Acta Radiol; 2018 Aug; 59(8):917-923. PubMed ID: 29181988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
