1067 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32089089)
1. The Current Versatility of Polyurethane Three-Dimensional Printing for Biomedical Applications.
Griffin M; Castro N; Bas O; Saifzadeh S; Butler P; Hutmacher DW
Tissue Eng Part B Rev; 2020 Jun; 26(3):272-283. PubMed ID: 32089089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deformation and fatigue of tough 3D printed elastomer scaffolds processed by fused deposition modeling and continuous liquid interface production.
Miller AT; Safranski DL; Wood C; Guldberg RE; Gall K
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Nov; 75():1-13. PubMed ID: 28689135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D printing and characterization of a soft and biostable elastomer with high flexibility and strength for biomedical applications.
Bachtiar EO; Erol O; Millrod M; Tao R; Gracias DH; Romer LH; Kang SH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Apr; 104():103649. PubMed ID: 32174407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Synthesis and 3D printing of biodegradable polyurethane elastomer by a water-based process for cartilage tissue engineering applications.
Hung KC; Tseng CS; Hsu SH
Adv Healthc Mater; 2014 Oct; 3(10):1578-87. PubMed ID: 24729580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel waterborne polyurethane with biodegradability and high flexibility for 3D printing.
Feng Z; Wang D; Zheng Y; Zhao L; Xu T; Guo Z; Irfan Hussain M; Zeng J; Lou L; Sun Y; Jiang H
Biofabrication; 2020 May; 12(3):035015. PubMed ID: 32150742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair.
Zhang L; Yang G; Johnson BN; Jia X
Acta Biomater; 2019 Jan; 84():16-33. PubMed ID: 30481607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Synthesis and characterization of biodegradable elastomeric polyurethane scaffolds fabricated by the inkjet technique.
Zhang C; Wen X; Vyavahare NR; Boland T
Biomaterials; 2008 Oct; 29(28):3781-91. PubMed ID: 18602156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stiffness memory nanohybrid scaffolds generated by indirect 3D printing for biologically responsive soft implants.
Wu L; Virdee J; Maughan E; Darbyshire A; Jell G; Loizidou M; Emberton M; Butler P; Howkins A; Reynolds A; Boyd IW; Birchall M; Song W
Acta Biomater; 2018 Oct; 80():188-202. PubMed ID: 30223094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Photopolymerizable Resins for 3D-Printing Solid-Cured Tissue Engineered Implants.
Guerra AJ; Lara-Padilla H; Becker ML; Rodriguez CA; Dean D
Curr Drug Targets; 2019; 20(8):823-838. PubMed ID: 30648506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biodegradable water-based polyurethane scaffolds with a sequential release function for cell-free cartilage tissue engineering.
Wen YT; Dai NT; Hsu SH
Acta Biomater; 2019 Apr; 88():301-313. PubMed ID: 30825604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D printing with silk: considerations and applications.
DeBari MK; Keyser MN; Bai MA; Abbott RD
Connect Tissue Res; 2020 Mar; 61(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 30558445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional (3D) synthetic printing for the manufacture of non-biodegradable models, tools and implants used in surgery: a review of current methods.
Kirby B; Kenkel JM; Zhang AY; Amirlak B; Suszynski TM
J Med Eng Technol; 2021 Jan; 45(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 33215944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Composites of waterborne polyurethane and cellulose nanofibers for 3D printing and bioapplications.
Chen RD; Huang CF; Hsu SH
Carbohydr Polym; 2019 May; 212():75-88. PubMed ID: 30832883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-Dimensional Printing of Biodegradable Piperazine-Based Polyurethane-Urea Scaffolds with Enhanced Osteogenesis for Bone Regeneration.
Ma Y; Hu N; Liu J; Zhai X; Wu M; Hu C; Li L; Lai Y; Pan H; Lu WW; Zhang X; Luo Y; Ruan C
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2019 Mar; 11(9):9415-9424. PubMed ID: 30698946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D printing metal implants in orthopedic surgery: Methods, applications and future prospects.
Meng M; Wang J; Huang H; Liu X; Zhang J; Li Z
J Orthop Translat; 2023 Sep; 42():94-112. PubMed ID: 37675040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of photocrosslinkable resin components and 3D printing process parameters.
Guerra AJ; Lammel-Lindemann J; Katko A; Kleinfehn A; Rodriguez CA; Catalani LH; Becker ML; Ciurana J; Dean D
Acta Biomater; 2019 Oct; 97():154-161. PubMed ID: 31352105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Polymer structure-property requirements for stereolithographic 3D printing of soft tissue engineering scaffolds.
Mondschein RJ; Kanitkar A; Williams CB; Verbridge SS; Long TE
Biomaterials; 2017 Sep; 140():170-188. PubMed ID: 28651145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 3D Printing of Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Composites Using Fused Deposition Modeling: A Status Review.
Pervaiz S; Qureshi TA; Kashwani G; Kannan S
Materials (Basel); 2021 Aug; 14(16):. PubMed ID: 34443044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biocompatible and Biodegradable 3D Printing from Bioplastics: A Review.
Andanje MN; Mwangi JW; Mose BR; Carrara S
Polymers (Basel); 2023 May; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 37242930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Synthesis and Characterization of Dual Stimuli-Sensitive Biodegradable Polyurethane Soft Hydrogels for 3D Cell-Laden Bioprinting.
Hsiao SH; Hsu SH
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2018 Sep; 10(35):29273-29287. PubMed ID: 30133249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
