These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32089446)
61. Experts in malpractice litigation--what about nurses? Popp PW Leg Med; 1992; ():165-78. PubMed ID: 1306278 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. [The surgeon's role as expert witness in malpractice lawsuits. Purpose and requirements of legal medical opinions]. Bauch J; Meier J; Ulsenheimer K Chirurg; 2005 Dec; 76(12):1185-97; quiz 1198-9. PubMed ID: 16323031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. How can jurors help oral and maxillofacial surgeons? Johnson WS; Canaan GC Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2009 Feb; 21(1):149-53, vii. PubMed ID: 19185801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. [The physician as medical expert in legal procedures]. Leenen HJ Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Feb; 137(8):419-23. PubMed ID: 8446202 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. The prima facie tort rule: a possible medical-legal answer to the medical malpractice crisis. Schussler T N Y State J Med; 1989 Jul; 89(7):399-402. PubMed ID: 2761868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. [Pioneer interventions in surgery and their legal background]. Deutsch E Zentralbl Chir; 1992; 117(10):569-74. PubMed ID: 1441783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. [The physician (surgeon) as an expert witness in the court room]. Hempel K Chirurg; 1992 Nov; 63(11):Suppl 215-8. PubMed ID: 1458976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. The expert witness in medical malpractice litigation. Bal BS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2009 Feb; 467(2):383-91. PubMed ID: 19052827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. [Status and responsibilities of the expert in malpractice procedures]. Ulsenheimer K Gynakologe; 1989 Dec; 22(6):401-5. PubMed ID: 2696707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. The geographical restrictions on expert testimony in medical malpractice cases in Virginia. Med Leg Bull; 1985; 34(5):1-10. PubMed ID: 4069071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. [Medical expert assessment in criminal processes from the legal viewpoint]. Ulsenheimer K Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1996 Nov; 90(7):574-81. PubMed ID: 9064925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. [Medico-legal evaluation of unfavorable outcomes in medical practice]. Gromov AP Sov Med; 1990; (7):3-11. PubMed ID: 2251559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. [Legal liability and responsibility of the physician]. Bock RW Chirurg; 1992 Sep; 63(9):suppl 176-80. PubMed ID: 1395870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. The assessment of expert testimony relevance and admissibility in medical malpractice cases in the Czech Republic. Can American judicial practice help us? Zakharov S Med Law; 2011 Mar; 30(1):147-63. PubMed ID: 21528803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Jousting--lighting the malpractice fuse. Velasco C Minn Med; 2007 Aug; 90(8):50-1. PubMed ID: 17899851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. [Autopsy refusal and reversal of the proof responsibility in the malpractice process]. Jansen C Pathologe; 1993 Mar; 14(2):68-70. PubMed ID: 8469647 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Plastic cup on i.v. site: nurse-expert testimony. Case in point: Morris v. Children's Hospital Medical Center (596 N.E. 2d 1110-OH [1992]). Tammelleo AD Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1992 Dec; 33(7):4. PubMed ID: 1494665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]