These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3209053)

  • 1. The impact of varying diagnostic thresholds on affected sib pair linkage analysis.
    Kendler KS
    Genet Epidemiol; 1988; 5(6):407-19. PubMed ID: 3209053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci.
    Blackwelder WC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal weighting scheme for affected sib-pair analysis of sibship data.
    Sham PC; Zhao JH; Curtis D
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jan; 61(Pt 1):61-9. PubMed ID: 9066928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power of the affected-sib-pair method to defect disease susceptibility loci of small effect: an application to multiple sclerosis.
    Suarez B; O'Rourke D; Van Eerdewegh P
    Am J Med Genet; 1982 Jul; 12(3):309-26. PubMed ID: 6956238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Affected sib pair identity by state analyses.
    Thomson G; Motro U
    Genet Epidemiol; 1994; 11(4):353-64. PubMed ID: 7813897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Increasing the efficiency of genomic searches for linkage in complex disorders by DNA pooling of affected sib-pairs.
    Craddock N; Daniels J; Holmans P; Williams N; Owen MJ
    Mol Psychiatry; 1996 Mar; 1(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 9118316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship estimation in affected sib pair analysis of late-onset diseases.
    Göring HH; Ott J
    Eur J Hum Genet; 1997; 5(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 9195155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The sib-pair problem. I. Affected pairs with parents. Constant penetrance models.
    Edwards JH
    Ann Hum Genet; 1997 Jul; 61(Pt 4):351-64. PubMed ID: 9365787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a susceptibility gene for schizophrenia on chromosome 6p by multipoint affected sib-pair linkage analysis.
    Schwab SG; Albus M; Hallmayer J; Hönig S; Borrmann M; Lichtermann D; Ebstein RP; Ackenheil M; Lerer B; Risch N
    Nat Genet; 1995 Nov; 11(3):325-7. PubMed ID: 7581458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correcting for ascertainment bias of relative-risk estimates obtained using affected-sib-pair linkage data.
    Cordell HJ; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):307-21. PubMed ID: 10797591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Affected sib-pair tests for linkage: type I errors with dependent sib-pairs.
    Meunier F; Philippi A; Martinez M; Demenais F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1107-11. PubMed ID: 9433632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The power of two-locus affected sib-pair linkage analysis to detect interacting disease loci.
    Hallgrímsdóttir IB; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17654608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of reduced fertility, method of ascertainment, and a second unlinked locus on affected sib-pair marker allele sharing.
    Risch N
    Am J Med Genet; 1983 Oct; 16(2):243-59. PubMed ID: 6580817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic heterogeneity in schizophrenia II: conditional analyses of affected schizophrenia sibling pairs provide evidence for an interaction between markers on chromosome 8p and 14q.
    Chiu YF; McGrath JA; Thornquist MH; Wolyniec PS; Nestadt G; Swartz KL; Lasseter VK; Liang KY; Pulver AE
    Mol Psychiatry; 2002; 7(6):658-64. PubMed ID: 12140791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Detection of major genes underlying several quantitative traits associated with a common disease using different ascertainment schemes.
    Iyengar S; Calafell F; Kidd KK
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):809-14. PubMed ID: 9433582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The affected sib-set method: revision based on the mixed model using a conditional probability approach].
    Sergeev AS
    Genetika; 1991 Nov; 27(11):2020-33. PubMed ID: 1802788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Likelihood-based inference for the genetic relative risk based on affected-sibling-pair marker data.
    McKnight B; Tierney C; McGorray SP; Day NE
    Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):426-43. PubMed ID: 9629637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Irish study on high-density schizophrenia families: field methods and power to detect linkage.
    Kendler KS; O'Neill FA; Burke J; Murphy B; Duke F; Straub RE; Shinkwin R; Ni Nuallain M; MacLean CJ; Walsh D
    Am J Med Genet; 1996 Apr; 67(2):179-90. PubMed ID: 8723045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linkage analysis of a common oligogenic disease using selected sib pairs.
    Cardon LR; Fulker DW; Cherny SS
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):741-6. PubMed ID: 8788002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.