186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32090811)
1. Field technical applicability and cost analysis for microwave based regenerating permeable reactive barriers (MW-PRBs) operating in Cs-contaminated groundwater treatment.
Falciglia PP; Gagliano E; Brancato V; Finocchiaro G; Catalfo A; De Guidi G; Romano S; Roccaro P; Vagliasindi FGA
J Environ Manage; 2020 Apr; 260():110064. PubMed ID: 32090811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microwave based regenerating permeable reactive barriers (MW-PRBs): Proof of concept and application for Cs removal.
Falciglia PP; Gagliano E; Brancato V; Malandrino G; Finocchiaro G; Catalfo A; De Guidi G; Romano S; Roccaro P; Vagliasindi FGA
Chemosphere; 2020 Jul; 251():126582. PubMed ID: 32443243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Microwave regeneration of granular activated carbon saturated with PFAS.
Gagliano E; Falciglia PP; Zaker Y; Karanfil T; Roccaro P
Water Res; 2021 Jun; 198():117121. PubMed ID: 33910144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combination of zeolite barrier and bio sparging techniques to enhance efficiency of organic hydrocarbon remediation in a model of shallow groundwater.
Ahmadnezhad Z; Vaezihir A; Schüth C; Zarrini G
Chemosphere; 2021 Jun; 273():128555. PubMed ID: 33087257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Remediation of nitrate-contaminated groundwater by PRB-Electrokinetic integrated process.
Ghaeminia M; Mokhtarani N
J Environ Manage; 2018 Sep; 222():234-241. PubMed ID: 29859463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multi-objective optimization of permeable reactive barrier design for Cr(VI) removal from groundwater.
Maamoun I; Eljamal O; Falyouna O; Eljamal R; Sugihara Y
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Sep; 200():110773. PubMed ID: 32464445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Arsenic adsorption on Fe-Mn modified granular activated carbon (GAC-FeMn): batch and fixed-bed column studies.
Nikić J; Agbaba J; Watson MA; Tubić A; Šolić M; Maletić S; Dalmacija B
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2019; 54(3):168-178. PubMed ID: 30688160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of field-scale permeable reactive barriers: An overview on potentials and possible implications for in-situ groundwater remediation applications.
Singh R; Chakma S; Birke V
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Feb; 858(Pt 1):158838. PubMed ID: 36122715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sodium alginate/graphene oxide hydrogel beads as permeable reactive barrier material for the remediation of ciprofloxacin-contaminated groundwater.
Zhao P; Yu F; Wang R; Ma Y; Wu Y
Chemosphere; 2018 Jun; 200():612-620. PubMed ID: 29510369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cr(VI)-contaminated groundwater remediation with simulated permeable reactive barrier (PRB) filled with natural pyrite as reactive material: Environmental factors and effectiveness.
Liu Y; Mou H; Chen L; Mirza ZA; Liu L
J Hazard Mater; 2015 Nov; 298():83-90. PubMed ID: 26026959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance of a field-scale biological permeable reactive barrier for in-situ remediation of nitrate-contaminated groundwater.
Gibert O; Assal A; Devlin H; Elliot T; Kalin RM
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Apr; 659():211-220. PubMed ID: 30599340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydrous ferric oxide incorporated diatomite for remediation of arsenic contaminated groundwater.
Jang M; Min SH; Park JK; Tlachac EJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 May; 41(9):3322-8. PubMed ID: 17539544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Column test-based optimization of the permeable reactive barrier (PRB) technique for remediating groundwater contaminated by landfill leachates.
Zhou D; Li Y; Zhang Y; Zhang C; Li X; Chen Z; Huang J; Li X; Flores G; Kamon M
J Contam Hydrol; 2014 Nov; 168():1-16. PubMed ID: 25244420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Simultaneous removal of Pb and MTBE by mixed zeolites in fixed-bed column tests.
Zhang Y; Wang F; Cao B; Yin H; Al-Tabbaa A
J Environ Sci (China); 2022 Dec; 122():41-49. PubMed ID: 35717089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using CO
Xu F; Luo X; Huang J; Dong Y; Zheng K; Liu Y; Liu Y; Wang H
J Environ Sci (China); 2024 Nov; 145():152-163. PubMed ID: 38844316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance expectation of coal waste in permeable reactive barrier for removal of cadmium considering contamination level and pore water velocity.
Kim JH; Kwak E; Lee S
Chemosphere; 2023 Dec; 345():140387. PubMed ID: 37832884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An overview of permeable reactive barriers for in situ sustainable groundwater remediation.
Obiri-Nyarko F; Grajales-Mesa SJ; Malina G
Chemosphere; 2014 Sep; 111():243-59. PubMed ID: 24997925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of zeolites in permeable reactive barriers (PRBs) for in-situ groundwater remediation: A critical review.
Zhang Y; Cao B; Yin H; Meng L; Jin W; Wang F; Xu J; Al-Tabbaa A
Chemosphere; 2022 Dec; 308(Pt 1):136290. PubMed ID: 36058373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting longevity of iron permeable reactive barriers using multiple iron deactivation models.
Carniato L; Schoups G; Seuntjens P; Van Nooten T; Simons Q; Bastiaens L
J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Nov; 142-143():93-108. PubMed ID: 23174212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Three porous shapeable three-component hydrogen-bonded covalent-organic aerogels as backfill materials in a simulated permeable reactive barrier (PRB) for trapping levofloxacin.
Zhang F; Hong M; Bai J; Liu Z; Jia A; Liu Z; Shi C; Li Y
J Hazard Mater; 2022 Jan; 422():126829. PubMed ID: 34399228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
