These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32090921)
1. Which materials would account for a better mechanical behavior for direct endocrown restorations? Sedrez-Porto JA; Münchow EA; Cenci MS; Pereira-Cenci T J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103592. PubMed ID: 32090921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New material perspective for endocrown restorations: effects on mechanical performance and fracture behavior. Sedrez-Porto JA; Münchow EA; Valente LL; Cenci MS; Pereira-Cenci T Braz Oral Res; 2019 Feb; 33():e012. PubMed ID: 30758409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Features of fracture of prosthetic tooth-endocrown constructions by means of acoustic emission analysis. Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Pavlychko R Dent Mater; 2018 Mar; 34(3):e46-e55. PubMed ID: 29409675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of Adhesive Core Buildup Designs on the Resistance of Endodontically Treated Molars Restored With Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns. Carvalho AO; Bruzi G; Anderson RE; Maia HP; Giannini M; Magne P Oper Dent; 2016; 41(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 26266647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution. Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of no-ferrule and no-post buildup design on the fatigue resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with resin nanoceramic CAD/CAM crowns. Magne P; Carvalho AO; Bruzi G; Anderson RE; Maia HP; Giannini M Oper Dent; 2014; 39(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 25084102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars Restored With Different Methods. Mergulhão VA; de Mendonça LS; de Albuquerque MS; Braz R Oper Dent; 2019; 44(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 30715998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical Assessment of Restored Mandibular Molar by Endocrown in Comparison to a Glass Fiber Post-Retained Conventional Crown: 3D Finite Element Analysis. Helal MA; Wang Z J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):988-996. PubMed ID: 29067737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of fracture strength of endocrowns and glass fiber post-retained conventional crowns. Biacchi GR; Basting RT Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 21942234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of restorative material selection and cementation procedures on the durability of endocrowns in the anterior teeth: an in-vitro study. Samra N; Madina MM; El-Negoly SAE; Dawood L BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jun; 24(1):670. PubMed ID: 38851731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preparation Ferrule Design Effect on Endocrown Failure Resistance. Einhorn M; DuVall N; Wajdowicz M; Brewster J; Roberts H J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e237-e242. PubMed ID: 28985446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture resistance and failure modes of lithium disilicate or composite endocrowns. Altier M; Erol F; Yildirim G; Dalkilic EE Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Jul; 21(7):821-826. PubMed ID: 29984710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of endodontic access preparation on the failure load of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations. Qeblawi D; Hill T; Chlosta K J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):328-36. PubMed ID: 22024183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic properties of fracture of dental restorative materials and endocrown restorations under quasi-static loading. Skalskyi V; Makeev V; Stankevych O; Dubytskyi O Dent Mater; 2020 May; 36(5):617-625. PubMed ID: 32299664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Post-Fatigue Fracture and Marginal Behavior of Endodontically Treated Teeth: Partial Crown vs. Full Crown vs. Endocrown vs. Fiber-Reinforced Resin Composite. Frankenberger R; Winter J; Dudek MC; Naumann M; Amend S; Braun A; Krämer N; Roggendorf MJ Materials (Basel); 2021 Dec; 14(24):. PubMed ID: 34947327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture strength, failure type and Weibull characteristics of lithium disilicate and multiphase resin composite endocrowns under axial and lateral forces. Gresnigt MM; Özcan M; van den Houten ML; Schipper L; Cune MS Dent Mater; 2016 May; 32(5):607-14. PubMed ID: 26935018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal gap distance and cyclic fatigue loading for different all-ceramic endocrowns. Elsayed SM; Emam ZN; Abu-Nawareg M; Zidan AZ; Elsisi HA; Abuelroos EM; Fansa HA; Shokier HMR; Elbanna KA Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Feb; 27(3):879-887. PubMed ID: 36808333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New generation bulk-fill resin composites: Effects on mechanical strength and fracture reliability. Rosa de Lacerda L; Bossardi M; Silveira Mitterhofer WJ; Galbiatti de Carvalho F; Carlo HL; Piva E; Münchow EA J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Aug; 96():214-218. PubMed ID: 31055211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Endocrown Biomechanical Response According to Different Pulp Chamber Extension Angles and Filling Materials. Tribst JPM; Lo Giudice R; Dos Santos AFC; Borges ALS; Silva-Concílio LR; Amaral M; Lo Giudice G Materials (Basel); 2021 Mar; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 33803194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars using different preparation designs and CAD/CAM materials. Pedrollo Lise D; Van Ende A; De Munck J; Umeda Suzuki TY; Cardoso Vieira LC; Van Meerbeek B J Dent; 2017 Apr; 59():54-61. PubMed ID: 28214537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]