174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32091253)
1. Germline Genome Editing Research: What Are Gamete Donors (Not) Informed About in Consent Forms?
Niemiec E; Howard HC
CRISPR J; 2020 Feb; 3(1):52-63. PubMed ID: 32091253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ordo-Responsibility for Germline Gene Editing.
Ranisch R; Rudolph T; Cremer HJ; Knoepffler N
CRISPR J; 2020 Feb; 3(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 32091257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethics of Human Genome Editing.
Coller BS
Annu Rev Med; 2019 Jan; 70():289-305. PubMed ID: 30691366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Promise of CRISPR for Human Germline Editing and the Perils of "Playing God".
Locke LG
CRISPR J; 2020 Feb; 3(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 32091254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Good eggs? Evaluating consent forms for egg donation.
Cattapan AR
J Med Ethics; 2016 Jul; 42(7):455-9. PubMed ID: 26951214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CRISPR Ethics: Moral Considerations for Applications of a Powerful Tool.
Brokowski C; Adli M
J Mol Biol; 2019 Jan; 431(1):88-101. PubMed ID: 29885329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genome engineering through CRISPR/Cas9 technology in the human germline and pluripotent stem cells.
Vassena R; Heindryckx B; Peco R; Pennings G; Raya A; Sermon K; Veiga A
Hum Reprod Update; 2016 Jun; 22(4):411-9. PubMed ID: 26932460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genome Editing 2020: Ethics and Human Rights in Germline Editing in Humans and Gene Drives in Mosquitoes.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 2020 May; 46(2-3):143-165. PubMed ID: 32659189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Procreative Non-Maleficence: A South African Human Rights Perspective on Heritable Human Genome Editing.
Thaldar D; Shozi B
CRISPR J; 2020 Feb; 3(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 32091250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical Considerations in Therapeutic Clinical Trials Involving Novel Human Germline-Editing Technology.
Brokowski C; Adli M
CRISPR J; 2020 Feb; 3(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 32091258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The promise and challenge of therapeutic genome editing.
Doudna JA
Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):229-236. PubMed ID: 32051598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Crispr-Cas9 Gene Editing Revolution and the Its Ethical and Legal Challenges].
Bellver Capella V
Cuad Bioet; 2016; 27(90):223-39. PubMed ID: 27637196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human germline editing in the era of CRISPR-Cas: risk and uncertainty, inter-generational responsibility, therapeutic legitimacy.
Schleidgen S; Dederer HG; Sgodda S; Cravcisin S; Lüneburg L; Cantz T; Heinemann T
BMC Med Ethics; 2020 Sep; 21(1):87. PubMed ID: 32912206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Informing egg donors of the potential for embryonic research: a survey of consent forms from U.S. in vitro fertilization clinics.
Schaefer GO; Sinaii N; Grady C
Fertil Steril; 2012 Feb; 97(2):427-33. PubMed ID: 22196714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Human Germline Genome Editing.
Ormond KE; Mortlock DP; Scholes DT; Bombard Y; Brody LC; Faucett WA; Garrison NA; Hercher L; Isasi R; Middleton A; Musunuru K; Shriner D; Virani A; Young CE
Am J Hum Genet; 2017 Aug; 101(2):167-176. PubMed ID: 28777929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Safety of Germline Genome Editing for Genetically Related "Future" Children as Perceived by Parents.
Ishii T; Beriain IM
CRISPR J; 2019 Dec; 2(6):370-375. PubMed ID: 31746634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Consent Form in the Chinese CRISPR Study: In Search of Ethical Gene Editing.
Shaw D
J Bioeth Inq; 2020 Mar; 17(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 31900853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics and Global Governance of Human Germline Genome Editing: The Problem of Techno-Scientific Colonialist Paternalism.
Arguedas-Ramírez G
CRISPR J; 2020 Apr; 3(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 32315224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experiments that led to the first gene-edited babies: the ethical failings and the urgent need for better governance.
Li JR; Walker S; Nie JB; Zhang XQ
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2019 Jan.; 20(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 30614228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of mouse and human preimplantation development following POU5F1 CRISPR/Cas9 targeting reveals interspecies differences.
Stamatiadis P; Boel A; Cosemans G; Popovic M; Bekaert B; Guggilla R; Tang M; De Sutter P; Van Nieuwerburgh F; Menten B; Stoop D; Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM; Coucke P; Heindryckx B
Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 36(5):1242-1252. PubMed ID: 33609360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
