167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32091655)
1. Resources for forwards citation searching for implementation studies in dementia care: A case study comparing Web of Science and Scopus.
Rogers M; Bethel A; Briscoe S
Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):379-386. PubMed ID: 32091655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Croatian Medical Journal citation score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
Sember M; Utrobicić A; Petrak J
Croat Med J; 2010 Apr; 51(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 20401951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science.
Bakkalbasi N; Bauer K; Glover J; Wang L
Biomed Digit Libr; 2006 Jun; 3():7. PubMed ID: 16805916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Capturing citation activity in three health sciences departments: a comparison study of Scopus and Web of Science.
Sarkozy A; Slyman A; Wu W
Med Ref Serv Q; 2015; 34(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 25927511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Citation searching: a systematic review case study of multiple risk behaviour interventions.
Wright K; Golder S; Rodriguez-Lopez R
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jun; 14():73. PubMed ID: 24893958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using citation tracking for systematic literature searching - study protocol for a scoping review of methodological studies and a Delphi study.
Hirt J; Nordhausen T; Appenzeller-Herzog C; Ewald H
F1000Res; 2020; 9():1386. PubMed ID: 34631036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.
Kulkarni AV; Aziz B; Shams I; Busse JW
JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(10):1092-6. PubMed ID: 19738094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Conduct and reporting of citation searching in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study.
Briscoe S; Bethel A; Rogers M
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):169-180. PubMed ID: 31127978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with Web of Science and Google Scholar.
Levay P; Ainsworth N; Kettle R; Morgan A
Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 26147600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A systematic review case study of urgent and emergency care configuration found citation searching of Web of Science and Google Scholar of similar value.
Cantrell A; Booth A; Chambers D
Health Info Libr J; 2024 Jun; 41(2):166-181. PubMed ID: 35289476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing.
De Groote SL; Raszewski R
Nurs Outlook; 2012; 60(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 22748758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How long does it take for the scientific literature to purge itself of fraudulent material?: the Breuning case revisited.
Korpela KM
Curr Med Res Opin; 2010 Apr; 26(4):843-7. PubMed ID: 20136577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Information Retrieval in Food Science Research II: Accounting for Relevance When Evaluating Database Performance.
Urhan TK; Rempel HG; Meunier-Goddik L; Penner MH
J Food Sci; 2019 Oct; 84(10):2729-2735. PubMed ID: 31550403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
Bramer WM; Rethlefsen ML; Kleijnen J; Franco OH
Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):245. PubMed ID: 29208034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Citation tracking for systematic literature searching: A scoping review.
Hirt J; Nordhausen T; Appenzeller-Herzog C; Ewald H
Res Synth Methods; 2023 May; 14(3):563-579. PubMed ID: 37042216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coverage and quality: A comparison of Web of Science and Scopus databases for reporting faculty nursing publication metrics.
Powell KR; Peterson SR
Nurs Outlook; 2017; 65(5):572-578. PubMed ID: 28377037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bidirectional citation searching to completion: an exploration of literature searching methods.
Hinde S; Spackman E
Pharmacoeconomics; 2015 Jan; 33(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 25145803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Overlaps of multiple database retrieval and citation tracking in dementia care research: a methodological study.
Hirt J; Bergmann J; Karrer M
J Med Libr Assoc; 2021 Apr; 109(2):275-285. PubMed ID: 34285670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension.
Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supplementary strategies identified additional eligible studies in qualitative systematic reviews.
Frandsen TF; Eriksen MB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Jul; 159():85-91. PubMed ID: 37201687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
