These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1078 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32092194)

  • 1. Temporary left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to heart transplantation.
    Seese L; Hickey G; Keebler ME; Mathier MA; Sultan I; Gleason TG; Wang Y; Kilic A
    J Card Surg; 2020 Apr; 35(4):810-817. PubMed ID: 32092194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal Donor Use in Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation With Left Ventricular Assist Device Explantation.
    Fudim M; Davis ME; Jenkins C; Brown CL; Wigger MA; Stulak JM; Maltais S; Haglund N
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Dec; 100(6):2117-25; discussion 2125-6. PubMed ID: 26338051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Waitlist and transplant outcomes in heart transplant candidates bridged with temporary endovascular right ventricular assist devices.
    Kwon JH; Skidmore SH; Bhandari K; Carnicelli AP; Yourshaw JP; Shorbaji K; Kilic A
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2024 Mar; 43(3):369-378. PubMed ID: 37951321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do Patients Supported With Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Have a Sufficient Risk of Death to Justify a Priority Allocation? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of Patients Listed in UNOS Status 2.
    Mastrobuoni S; Dell'Aquila AM; Van Caenegem O; Poncelet A; Jacquet LM; Garcia J
    Transplantation; 2018 Jun; 102(6):e288-e294. PubMed ID: 29346259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sex-Related Differences in Use and Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Bridge to Transplantation.
    DeFilippis EM; Truby LK; Garan AR; Givens RC; Takeda K; Takayama H; Naka Y; Haythe JH; Farr MA; Topkara VK
    JACC Heart Fail; 2019 Mar; 7(3):250-257. PubMed ID: 30819381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should patients 60 years and older undergo bridge to transplantation with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices?
    Allen JG; Kilic A; Weiss ES; Arnaoutakis GJ; George TJ; Shah AS; Conte JV
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Dec; 94(6):2017-24. PubMed ID: 22858277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sex-Based Heart Transplant Outcomes After Bridging With Centrifugal Left Ventricular Assist Devices.
    Huckaby LV; Seese LM; Aranda-Michel E; Mathier MA; Hickey G; Keebler ME; Sultan I; Gleason TG; Kilic A
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Dec; 110(6):2026-2033. PubMed ID: 32376349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Left ventricular assist device bridging to heart transplantation: Comparison of temporary versus durable support.
    Hess NR; Hickey GW; Keebler ME; Huston JH; McNamara DM; Mathier MA; Wang Y; Kaczorowski DJ
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2023 Jan; 42(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 36182653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database annual report: Evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships.
    Kormos RL; Cowger J; Pagani FD; Teuteberg JJ; Goldstein DJ; Jacobs JP; Higgins RS; Stevenson LW; Stehlik J; Atluri P; Grady KL; Kirklin JK
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2019 Feb; 38(2):114-126. PubMed ID: 30691593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of heart transplant recipients bridged with percutaneous versus durable left ventricular assist devices.
    Xia Y; Kim JS; Eng IK; Nsair A; Ardehali A; Shemin RJ; Kwon MH
    Clin Transplant; 2023 Apr; 37(4):e14904. PubMed ID: 36594638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Morbidity and mortality in heart transplant candidates supported with mechanical circulatory support: is reappraisal of the current United network for organ sharing thoracic organ allocation policy justified?
    Wever-Pinzon O; Drakos SG; Kfoury AG; Nativi JN; Gilbert EM; Everitt M; Alharethi R; Brunisholz K; Bader FM; Li DY; Selzman CH; Stehlik J
    Circulation; 2013 Jan; 127(4):452-62. PubMed ID: 23271796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamic Changes in Aortic Vascular Stiffness in Patients Bridged to Transplant With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.
    Patel AC; Dodson RB; Cornwell WK; Hunter KS; Cleveland JC; Brieke A; Lindenfeld J; Ambardekar AV
    JACC Heart Fail; 2017 Jun; 5(6):449-459. PubMed ID: 28285118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of heart transplant outcomes between recipients with pulsatile- vs continuous-flow LVAD.
    Yazdchi F; Rajab TK; Rinewalt D; Loberman D; Shekar P; Percy E; Hirji S; Urban R; Lehman RR; Mallidi HR; Singh SK
    J Card Surg; 2019 Oct; 34(10):1062-1068. PubMed ID: 31389644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Post-transplant outcome in patients bridged to transplant with temporary mechanical circulatory support devices.
    Yin MY; Wever-Pinzon O; Mehra MR; Selzman CH; Toll AE; Cherikh WS; Nativi-Nicolau J; Fang JC; Kfoury AG; Gilbert EM; Kemeyou L; McKellar SH; Koliopoulou A; Vaduganathan M; Drakos SG; Stehlik J
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2019 Aug; 38(8):858-869. PubMed ID: 31072751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-heart transplantation outcome of HeartMate II-bridged recipients requiring unplanned concomitant temporary right ventricular mechanical support.
    Urban M; Pirk J; Szarszoi O; Besik J; Netuka I
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2015 Mar; 20(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 25487235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Left ventricular assist devices: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2004; 4(3):1-69. PubMed ID: 23074453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Changing outcomes in patients bridged to heart transplantation with continuous- versus pulsatile-flow ventricular assist devices: an analysis of the registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.
    Nativi JN; Drakos SG; Kucheryavaya AY; Edwards LB; Selzman CH; Taylor DO; Hertz MI; Kfoury AG; Stehlik J
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2011 Aug; 30(8):854-61. PubMed ID: 21571550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Post-cardiac transplant survival after support with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: impact of duration of left ventricular assist device support and other variables.
    John R; Pagani FD; Naka Y; Boyle A; Conte JV; Russell SD; Klodell CT; Milano CA; Rogers J; Farrar DJ; Frazier OH
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Jul; 140(1):174-81. PubMed ID: 20447659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes and healthcare expenditures in the real world with left ventricular assist devices - The CLEAR-LVAD study.
    Pagani FD; Mehra MR; Cowger JA; Horstmanshof DA; Silvestry SC; Atluri P; Cleveland JC; Lindenfeld J; Roberts GJ; Bharmi R; Dalal N; Kormos RL; Rogers JG
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2021 May; 40(5):323-333. PubMed ID: 33744086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of Bridge to Transplantation With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Posttransplantation Mortality.
    Truby LK; Farr MA; Garan AR; Givens R; Restaino SW; Latif F; Takayama H; Naka Y; Takeda K; Topkara VK
    Circulation; 2019 Aug; 140(6):459-469. PubMed ID: 31203669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.