These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32092549)

  • 1. A test of two processes: The effect of training on deductive and inductive reasoning.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK; Kalish ML
    Cognition; 2020 Jun; 199():104223. PubMed ID: 32092549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The dimensionality of reasoning: Inductive and deductive inference can be explained by a single process.
    Hayes BK; Stephens RG; Ngo J; Dunn JC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1333-1351. PubMed ID: 29389195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling the effects of argument length and validity on inductive and deductive reasoning.
    Rotello CM; Heit E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1317-30. PubMed ID: 19686024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why is logic so likeable? A single-process account of argument evaluation with logic and liking judgments.
    Hayes BK; Wei P; Dunn JC; Stephens RG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(4):699-719. PubMed ID: 31343253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are there two processes in reasoning? The dimensionality of inductive and deductive inferences.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK
    Psychol Rev; 2018 Mar; 125(2):218-244. PubMed ID: 29265853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning.
    Heit E; Rotello CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):805-12. PubMed ID: 20438276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A contribute to the default-interventionist and parallel accounts in deductive reasoning. The effect of decisional styles on logic and belief.
    Fabio RA; Verzì D; Gangemi A
    J Gen Psychol; 2024; 151(2):209-222. PubMed ID: 37526357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When fast logic meets slow belief: Evidence for a parallel-processing model of belief bias.
    Trippas D; Thompson VA; Handley SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):539-552. PubMed ID: 28028779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do modals identify better models? A comparison of signal detection and probabilistic models of inductive reasoning.
    Rotello CM; Heit E; Kelly LJ
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 Aug; 112():1-24. PubMed ID: 30974308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The logic-bias effect: The role of effortful processing in the resolution of belief-logic conflict.
    Howarth S; Handley SJ; Walsh C
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):330-49. PubMed ID: 26390872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Belief bias is response bias: Evidence from a two-step signal detection model.
    Stephens RG; Dunn JC; Hayes BK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Feb; 45(2):320-332. PubMed ID: 30047766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two kinds of reasoning.
    Rips LJ
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11340921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mental models in deductive reasoning.
    García-Madruga JA; Gutiérrez F; Carriedo N; Moreno S; Johnson-Laird PN
    Span J Psychol; 2002 Nov; 5(2):125-40. PubMed ID: 12428479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Naive theories and causal deduction.
    Cummins DD
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Sep; 23(5):646-58. PubMed ID: 7476249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of belief and logic on syllogistic reasoning: Eye-movement evidence for selective processing models.
    Ball LJ; Phillips P; Wade CN; Quayle JD
    Exp Psychol; 2006; 53(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 16610275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Always look on the bright side of logic? Testing explanations of intuitive sensitivity to logic in perceptual tasks.
    Hayes BK; Stephens RG; Lee MD; Dunn JC; Kaluve A; Choi-Christou J; Cruz N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1598-1617. PubMed ID: 35084930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can cognitive psychological research on reasoning enhance the discussion around moral judgments?
    Bialek M; Terbeck S
    Cogn Process; 2016 Aug; 17(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 27016146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantitative causal model theory of conditional reasoning.
    Fernbach PM; Erb CD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1327-43. PubMed ID: 23565785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Logic, beliefs, and instruction: a test of the default interventionist account of belief bias.
    Handley SJ; Newstead SE; Trippas D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):28-43. PubMed ID: 21058879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How many kinds of reasoning? Inference, probability, and natural language semantics.
    Lassiter D; Goodman ND
    Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():123-34. PubMed ID: 25497521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.