124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32092803)
1. Analyzing the provision of ecosystem services by conservation easements and other protected and non-protected areas in the Upper Chattahoochee Watershed.
Benez-Secanho FJ; Dwivedi P
Sci Total Environ; 2020 May; 717():137218. PubMed ID: 32092803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trade-offs Between the Value of Ecosystem Services and Connectivity Among Protected Areas in the Upper Chattahoochee Watershed.
Benez-Secanho FJ; Dwivedi P; Ferreira S; Hepinstall-Cymerman J; Wenger S
Environ Manage; 2022 May; 69(5):937-951. PubMed ID: 35103811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Urban expansion simulation and the spatio-temporal changes of ecosystem services, a case study in Atlanta Metropolitan area, USA.
Sun X; Crittenden JC; Li F; Lu Z; Dou X
Sci Total Environ; 2018 May; 622-623():974-987. PubMed ID: 29890614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Identification of priority conservation areas based on ecosystem services and systematic conservation planning analysis.
Wang K; Li S; Zhu Z; Gao X; Li X; Tang W; Liang J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):36573-36587. PubMed ID: 36550250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the ecological and social benefits of private land conservation in Colorado.
Wallace GN; Theobald DM; Ernst T; King K
Conserv Biol; 2008 Apr; 22(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 18402582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying priority areas for conservation: using ecosystem services hotspot mapping for land-use/land-cover planning in central of Iran.
Abolmaali SM; Tarkesh M; Mousavi SA; Karimzadeh H; Pourmanafi S; Fakheran S
Environ Manage; 2024 May; 73(5):1016-1031. PubMed ID: 38345757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Exploring ecosystem services and scenario simulation in the headwaters of Qiantang River watershed of China.
Sun X; Zhang Y; Shen Y; Randhir TO; Cao M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Dec; 26(34):34905-34923. PubMed ID: 31656994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Tradeoffs and synergies of ecosystem services in western mountainous China: A case study of the Bailongjiang watershed in Gansu, China].
Gong J; Liu DQ; Gao BL; Xu CX; Li Y
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2020 Apr; 31(4):1278-1288. PubMed ID: 32530203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perpetual conservation easements and landowners: evaluating easement knowledge, satisfaction and partner organization relationships.
Stroman DA; Kreuter UP
J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():284-291. PubMed ID: 25190596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Land use trade-offs associated with protected areas in China: Current state, existing evaluation methods, and future application of ecosystem service valuation.
Chen H
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Apr; 711():134688. PubMed ID: 31831250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do urban planning policies meet sustainable urbanization goals? A scenario-based study in Beijing, China.
Xu Q; Zheng X; Zheng M
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 670():498-507. PubMed ID: 30904661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interacting Social and Environmental Predictors for the Spatial Distribution of Conservation Lands.
Baldwin RF; Leonard PB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140540. PubMed ID: 26465155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An interdisciplinary assessment of private conservation areas in the Western United States.
Quintas-Soriano C; Gibson DM; Brandt JS; López-Rodríguez MD; Cabello J; Aguilera PA; Castro AJ
Ambio; 2021 Jan; 50(1):150-162. PubMed ID: 32086786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Spatiotemporal assessment and trade-offs of multiple ecosystem services based on land use changes in Zengcheng, China.
Sun X; Li F
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Dec; 609():1569-1581. PubMed ID: 28810509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Land use trade-offs in China's protected areas from the perspective of accounting values of ecosystem services.
Chen H; Costanza R; Kubiszewski I
J Environ Manage; 2022 Aug; 315():115178. PubMed ID: 35504187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrating ecosystem services and landscape ecological risk into adaptive management: Insights from a western mountain-basin area, China.
Gong J; Cao E; Xie Y; Xu C; Li H; Yan L
J Environ Manage; 2021 Mar; 281():111817. PubMed ID: 33385901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of land use change on the ecosystem service trade-offs in the ecological restoration area: Dynamics and scenarios in the Yanhe watershed, China.
Yang S; Zhao W; Liu Y; Wang S; Wang J; Zhai R
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Dec; 644():556-566. PubMed ID: 29990905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protected area, easement, and rental contract data reveal five communities of land protection in the United States.
Jackson HB; Kroetz K; Sanchirico JN; Thompson A; Armsworth PR
Ecol Appl; 2021 Jul; 31(5):e02322. PubMed ID: 33655588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating the value of non-use benefits from small changes in the provision of ecosystem services.
Dutton A; Edwards-Jones G; Macdonald DW
Conserv Biol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):1479-87. PubMed ID: 20560999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ecosystem services of human-dominated watersheds and land use influences: a case study from the Dianchi Lake watershed in China.
Hou Y; Li B; Müller F; Chen W
Environ Monit Assess; 2016 Nov; 188(11):652. PubMed ID: 27822787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
