163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32094027)
1. Dose distributions in adult and child head phantoms for panoramic and cone beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint.
Iskanderani D; Nilsson M; Alstergren P; Hellén-Halme K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Aug; 130(2):200-208. PubMed ID: 32094027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography.
Al-Okshi A; Nilsson M; Petersson A; Wiese M; Lindh C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120343. PubMed ID: 23610090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Absorbed doses for patients undergoing panoramic radiography, cephalometric radiography and CBCT.
Wrzesień M; Olszewski J
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2017 Jul; 30(5):705-713. PubMed ID: 28584324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of absorbed doses and organ doses measured with thermoluminescent dosimeters and Gafchromic film for cone beam computed tomography examination of the posterior mandibular region in a head phantom.
Cederhag J; Kadesjö N; Nilsson M; Alstergren P; Shi XQ; Hellén-Halme K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Dec; 136(6):769-776. PubMed ID: 37625926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Small field of view cone beam CT temporomandibular joint imaging dosimetry.
Lukat TD; Wong JC; Lam EW
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(10):20130082. PubMed ID: 24048693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Absorbed dose and the effective dose of panoramic temporo mandibular joint radiography].
Matsuo A; Okano T; Gotoh K; Yokoi M; Hirukawa A; Okumura S; Koyama S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(10):1275-83. PubMed ID: 22026980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of CBCT radiation doses with conventional radiographs in TMJ imaging using Monte Carlo simulations.
Deniz Y; Eren H; Sessiz R; Coşan Ata G
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2024 Mar; 63(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 38182962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms.
Theodorakou C; Walker A; Horner K; Pauwels R; Bogaerts R; Jacobs R;
Br J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 85(1010):153-60. PubMed ID: 22308220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis?
Ting S; Attaia D; Johnson KB; Kossa SS; Friedland B; Allareddy V; Masoud MI
Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 33378479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation dosimetry analyses of radiographic imaging systems used for orthodontic treatment: comparison among child, adolescent, and adult patients.
Lee KS; Nam OH; Kim GT; Choi SC; Choi YS; Hwang EH
Oral Radiol; 2021 Apr; 37(2):245-250. PubMed ID: 32361820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric evaluation for temporomandibular joint cone beam computed tomography exams using different field of view.
Pinto CA; Caetano GFDR; Andrade MEA; Panzarella FK; Junqueira JLC; Peroni LV; Nascimento MDCC
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Sep; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 34488205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.
Ludlow JB; Davies-Ludlow LE; Brooks SL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 13679353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effective doses from panoramic radiography and CBCT (cone beam CT) using dose area product (DAP) in dentistry.
Shin HS; Nam KC; Park H; Choi HU; Kim HY; Park CS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(5):20130439. PubMed ID: 24845340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ESTIMATING RADIATION DOSE TO MAJOR ORGANS IN DENTAL X-RAY EXAMINATIONS: A PHANTOM STUDY.
Li Y; Huang B; Cao J; Fang T; Liu G; Li X; Wu J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Dec; 192(3):328-334. PubMed ID: 33320946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiation dose from X-ray examinations of impacted canines: cone beam CT vs two-dimensional imaging.
Kadesjö N; Lynds R; Nilsson M; Shi XQ
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Feb; 47(3):20170305. PubMed ID: 29303367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring absorbed dose for i-CAT CBCT examinations in child, adolescent and adult phantoms.
Choi E; Ford NL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(6):20150018. PubMed ID: 25785822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetry in CBCT with Different Protocols: Emphasis on Small FOVs Including Exams for TMJ.
Nascimento HAR; Andrade MEA; Frazão MAG; Nascimento EHL; Ramos-Perez FMM; Freitas DQ
Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(4):511-516. PubMed ID: 29160405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
