These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

694 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32094201)

  • 1. Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Synchronization to Competing Speech during Selective Attention.
    Fuglsang SA; Märcher-Rørsted J; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 40(12):2562-2572. PubMed ID: 32094201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensorineural hearing loss degrades behavioral and physiological measures of human spatial selective auditory attention.
    Dai L; Best V; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Apr; 115(14):E3286-E3295. PubMed ID: 29555752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noise-robust cortical tracking of attended speech in real-world acoustic scenes.
    Fuglsang SA; Dau T; Hjortkjær J
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():435-444. PubMed ID: 28412441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural tracking of attended versus ignored speech is differentially affected by hearing loss.
    Petersen EB; Wöstmann M; Obleser J; Lunner T
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 27707813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Early and Late Cortical Representations of Competing Talkers in Noise.
    Alickovic E; Ng EHN; Fiedler L; Santurette S; Innes-Brown H; Graversen C
    Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():636060. PubMed ID: 33841081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
    Weglage A; Layer N; Meister H; Müller V; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Sandmann P
    Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Weak neural signatures of spatial selective auditory attention in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bonacci LM; Dai L; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Oct; 146(4):2577. PubMed ID: 31671991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural Representation Enhanced for Speech and Reduced for Background Noise With a Hearing Aid Noise Reduction Scheme During a Selective Attention Task.
    Alickovic E; Lunner T; Wendt D; Fiedler L; Hietkamp R; Ng EHN; Graversen C
    Front Neurosci; 2020; 14():846. PubMed ID: 33071722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EEG-based auditory attention decoding with audiovisual speech for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Wang B; Xu X; Niu Y; Wu C; Wu X; Chen J
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Nov; 33(22):10972-10983. PubMed ID: 37750333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnified Neural Envelope Coding Predicts Deficits in Speech Perception in Noise.
    Millman RE; Mattys SL; Gouws AD; Prendergast G
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7727-7736. PubMed ID: 28694336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential effects of hearing impairment and age on electrophysiological and behavioral measures of speech in noise.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y
    Hear Res; 2018 Dec; 370():130-142. PubMed ID: 30388571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding excessive SNR loss in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Grant KW; Walden TC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):258-73; quiz 337-8. PubMed ID: 23636208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Poor early cortical differentiation of speech predicts perceptual difficulties of severely hearing-impaired listeners in multi-talker environments.
    Paul BT; Uzelac M; Chan E; Dimitrijevic A
    Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):6141. PubMed ID: 32273536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Right Temporoparietal Junction Supports Speech Tracking During Selective Listening: Evidence from Concurrent EEG-fMRI.
    Puschmann S; Steinkamp S; Gillich I; Mirkovic B; Debener S; Thiel CM
    J Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 37(47):11505-11516. PubMed ID: 29061698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.