141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32094425)
1. Effect of decalcification protocols on immunohistochemistry and molecular analyses of bone samples.
Miquelestorena-Standley E; Jourdan ML; Collin C; Bouvier C; Larousserie F; Aubert S; Gomez-Brouchet A; Guinebretière JM; Tallegas M; Brulin B; Le Nail LR; Tallet A; Le Loarer F; Massiere J; Galant C; de Pinieux G
Mod Pathol; 2020 Aug; 33(8):1505-1517. PubMed ID: 32094425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the effect of various decalcification agents on the quantity and quality of nucleic acid (DNA and RNA) recovered from bone biopsies.
Singh VM; Salunga RC; Huang VJ; Tran Y; Erlander M; Plumlee P; Peterson MR
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2013 Aug; 17(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 23660273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of immunohistochemical detection of collagen type II in osteochondral sections by comparing decalcification and antigen retrieval agent combinations.
Amirtham SM; Ozbey O; Kachroo U; Ramasamy B; Vinod E
Clin Anat; 2020 Apr; 33(3):343-349. PubMed ID: 31381185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Different Decalcification Methods Using Rat Mandibles as a Model.
Savi FM; Brierly GI; Baldwin J; Theodoropoulos C; Woodruff MA
J Histochem Cytochem; 2017 Dec; 65(12):705-722. PubMed ID: 28958188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Routine acid decalcification of bone marrow samples can preserve DNA for FISH and CGH studies in metastatic prostate cancer.
Brown RS; Edwards J; Bartlett JW; Jones C; Dogan A
J Histochem Cytochem; 2002 Jan; 50(1):113-5. PubMed ID: 11748301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of EDTA decalcification on estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor immunohistochemistry and HER2/neu fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast carcinoma.
Washburn E; Tang X; Caruso C; Walls M; Han B
Hum Pathol; 2021 Nov; 117():108-114. PubMed ID: 34461131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tissue Morphology and Antigenicity in Mouse and Rat Tibia: Comparing 12 Different Decalcification Conditions.
Bogoevski K; Woloszyk A; Blackwood K; Woodruff MA; Glatt V
J Histochem Cytochem; 2019 Aug; 67(8):545-561. PubMed ID: 31090479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decalcification of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases With EDTA Does Not Affect ER, PR, and HER2 Results.
van Es SC; van der Vegt B; Bensch F; Gerritse S; van Helden EJ; Boon E; Angus L; Overbosch J; Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW; Verheul HM; van Herpen CML; Jager A; Oosting SF; de Vries EGE; Schröder CP
Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 Oct; 43(10):1355-1360. PubMed ID: 31283631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Decalcification Techniques for Rat Femurs Using HE and Immunohistochemical Staining.
Liu H; Zhu R; Liu C; Ma R; Wang L; Chen B; Li L; Niu J; Zhao D; Mo F; Fu M; Brömme D; Zhang D; Gao S
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():9050754. PubMed ID: 28246608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of bone decalcification procedures on DNA in situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization. EDTA is highly preferable to a routinely used acid decalcifier.
Alers JC; Krijtenburg PJ; Vissers KJ; van Dekken H
J Histochem Cytochem; 1999 May; 47(5):703-10. PubMed ID: 10219063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The comparative analyses of decalcification procedures and methyl benzoate pre-treatment on tissue preservation and antigenicity in human acetabular labra.
Pieroh P; Ehrlich A; Ghadban C; Litvak L; Steinke H; Josten C; Fakler JKM; Dehghani F
Histol Histopathol; 2019 Aug; 34(8):899-908. PubMed ID: 30758043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of tissue decalcification on mRNA retention within bone for in-situ hybridization studies.
Walsh L; Freemont AJ; Hoyland JA
Int J Exp Pathol; 1993 Jun; 74(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 8392858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Formic acid decalcification of bone marrow trephines degrades DNA: alternative use of EDTA allows the amplification and sequencing of relatively long PCR products.
Wickham CL; Sarsfield P; Joyner MV; Jones DB; Ellard S; Wilkins B
Mol Pathol; 2000 Dec; 53(6):336. PubMed ID: 11193054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. RNA preservation in decalcified cochlear samples.
Waissbluth S; Chan SW; Chen JZ; McIntosh M; Daniel SJ
Otol Neurotol; 2013 Feb; 34(2):331-7. PubMed ID: 23250382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of three decalcification agents for assessments of cranial fracture histomorphology.
Cornelison JB; Isaac CV; Devota CJ; Billian J; Brown TT; deJong JL; Douglas EA; Fisher-Hubbard AO; Lackey-Cornelison WL; Prahlow JA; Shattuck BL
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):1157-1166. PubMed ID: 35112350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Proposal of an appropriate decalcification method of bone marrow biopsy specimens in the era of expanding genetic molecular study.
Choi SE; Hong SW; Yoon SO
J Pathol Transl Med; 2015 May; 49(3):236-42. PubMed ID: 26018515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of decalcification procedures on immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology in breast cancer.
Schrijver WA; van der Groep P; Hoefnagel LD; Ter Hoeve ND; Peeters T; Moelans CB; van Diest PJ
Mod Pathol; 2016 Dec; 29(12):1460-1470. PubMed ID: 27562496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ultrasonic decalcification offers new perspectives for rapid FISH, DNA, and RT-PCR analysis in bone marrow trephines.
Reineke T; Jenni B; Abdou MT; Frigerio S; Zubler P; Moch H; Tinguely M
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):892-6. PubMed ID: 16819333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hypertonic saline- and detergent-accelerated EDTA-based decalcification better preserves mRNA of bones.
Li Z; Wenhart C; Reimann A; Cho YL; Adler K; Muench G
Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):10888. PubMed ID: 38740835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. One-Step Preservation and Decalcification of Bony Tissue for Molecular Profiling.
Mueller C; Harpole MG; Espina V
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1606():85-102. PubMed ID: 28501995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
