140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32094425)
21. [Study of methods of decalcification for making united slices of tooth and affiliated periodontic tissues].
Wang Y; Mu YB; Miao LY; Sun HC; Li CK
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Mar; 42(3):150-1. PubMed ID: 17565821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The effects of different decalcification protocols on TUNEL and general cartilage staining.
Emans PJ; Bulstra SK; Kuijer R
Biotech Histochem; 2005; 80(3-4):111-5. PubMed ID: 16298895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A novel approach to decalcification in histopathology laboratory: An adaptation from the Hammersmith protocol.
Pradhan P; Rajesh NG; Badhe BA; Ilanchezian K; Manimehalai D; Jyothish A
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2019; 62(3):423-429. PubMed ID: 31361231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparison of two different tissue decalcification methods for immunohistochemistry].
Du J; Liu JY; Su J
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Apr; 43(2):290-4. PubMed ID: 21503129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluating the Effects of Various Decalcification Protocols on Immunohistochemical Staining in Zebrafish (
Meritet DM; Spagnoli ST; Fischer KA; Löhr CV
Zebrafish; 2019 Jun; 16(3):280-290. PubMed ID: 31017539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Decalcification in formic acid after fixation in zinc-ethanol-formaldehyde does not preclude identification of neuronal and glial markers].
Kolos EA; Korzhevskiĭ DE
Morfologiia; 2013; 144(4):76-9. PubMed ID: 24592706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of EDTA and nitric acid solutions for decalcification of joints in AG/WT, BALB/c, C57, DBA1/J mice, and in Wistar rats.
Freitas EC; Dalmolin SP; da Silva MM; de Oliveira FH; Pilar EFS
Biotech Histochem; 2022 Jul; 97(5):372-381. PubMed ID: 34845957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [From an optimal management of bone tissue samples to a quality patients' care in 2022 : A new paradigm].
Miquelestorena-Standley E; Tallegas M; Bouvier C; Larousserie F; Aubert S; Gomez-Brouchet A; Guinebretière JM; Le Loarer F; Galant C; de Pinieux G
Ann Pathol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):202-207. PubMed ID: 35093248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Optimization of ovine bone decalcification for increased cellular detail: a parametric study.
Broomfield C; Meis N; Johnson J; Regan D; McGilvray K; Puttlitz C
J Histotechnol; 2022 Mar; 45(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 34382505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Quality Analysis of Bony Specimens for Optimal Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) Decalcification.
Craig JC; Freeman M; Walton S; Rogers D; Mehrad M; Gordetsky JB
Int J Surg Pathol; 2022 Dec; 30(8):853-860. PubMed ID: 35343279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Preservation of mRNA during in situ hybridization in the cochlea.
Ryan AF; Watts AG; Simmons DM
Hear Res; 1991 Nov; 56(1-2):148-52. PubMed ID: 1769909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of Hydrochloric Acid Decalcification on Expression Pattern of Prognostic Markers in Invasive Breast Carcinomas.
Maclary SC; Mohanty SK; Bose S; Chung F; Balzer BL
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2017 Feb; 25(2):144-149. PubMed ID: 27028239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Tissue integrity, costs and time associated with different agents for histological bone preparation.
Abrantes AA; Rafacho A; Rivero ER; Mariano FV; Siqueira FM; Gondak RO
Microsc Res Tech; 2017 Apr; 80(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 28370969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Microwave decalcification of human temporal bones.
Cunningham CD; Schulte BA; Bianchi LM; Weber PC; Schmiedt BN
Laryngoscope; 2001 Feb; 111(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 11210875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Efficiency of different decalcification protocols for nasal osseous structures in a rat experimental model of allergic rhinitis, and their effects on epithelial histology: an attempt at standardization.
Guibas GV; Lakis S; Gkimpas C; Manda M; Kapoukranidou D; Spandou E
Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2014 Dec; 66(9-10):469-75. PubMed ID: 25238695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Application of ultrasound accelerates the decalcification process of bone matrix without affecting histological and immunohistochemical analysis.
Chow DH; Zheng L; Tian L; Ho KS; Qin L; Guo X
J Orthop Translat; 2019 Apr; 17():112-120. PubMed ID: 31194084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparative study of various decalcification techniques.
Prasad P; Donoghue M
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(3):302-8. PubMed ID: 24025875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Decalcification of bone and dental specimens using formic acid aluminum chloride decalcifying fluid].
Xue SQ; Li HB; Wang Y; Wang Y; Li CK
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2006 Jun; 35(6):372-3. PubMed ID: 16834916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison between Conventional Decalcification and a Microwave-Assisted Method in Bone Tissue Affected with Mycetoma.
Salih MM
Biochem Res Int; 2020; 2020():6561980. PubMed ID: 32832156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of Decalcifying Agents of Variable Duration on PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry.
Strickland AL; Blacketer S; Molberg K; Markantonis J; Lucas E
Am J Clin Pathol; 2020 Jan; 153(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 31603186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
