These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3209489)

  • 1. Modulation of cochlear tuning by low-frequency sound.
    Klis JF; Prijs VF; Latour JB; Smoorenburg GF
    Hear Res; 1988 Nov; 36(2-3):163-73. PubMed ID: 3209489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of cochlear amplification, frequency tuning, and two-tone suppression in the mouse.
    Song L; McGee J; Walsh EJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jan; 99(1):344-55. PubMed ID: 17989242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modulation of responses of spiral ganglion cells in the guinea pig cochlea by low frequency sound.
    Sellick PM; Patuzzi R; Johnstone BM
    Hear Res; 1982 Jul; 7(2):199-221. PubMed ID: 7107528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cochlear potentials and their modulation by low-frequency sound in early endolymphatic hydrops.
    Klis JF; Smoorenburg GF
    Hear Res; 1988; 32(2-3):175-84. PubMed ID: 3360677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in endolymphatic potential and crossed olivocochlear bundle stimulation alter cochlear mechanics.
    Mountain DC
    Science; 1980 Oct; 210(4465):71-2. PubMed ID: 7414321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Low-frequency characteristics of intracellularly recorded receptor potentials in guinea-pig cochlear hair cells.
    Russell IJ; Sellick PM
    J Physiol; 1983 May; 338():179-206. PubMed ID: 6875955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pressure-induced basilar membrane position shifts and the stimulus-evoked potentials in the low-frequency region of the guinea pig cochlea.
    Fridberger A; van Maarseveen JT; Scarfone E; Ulfendahl M; Flock B; Flock A
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1997 Oct; 161(2):239-52. PubMed ID: 9366967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying psychoacoustic tuning curves for clinical use.
    Densert B; Kinberger B; Arlinger S; Densert O
    Scand Audiol; 1986; 15(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 3749782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cochlear threshold assessment using tone-derived action potentials.
    Salt AN; Vora AR
    Audiology; 1990; 29(3):135-45. PubMed ID: 2383213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cochlear microphonic responses of the peripheral auditory system to frequency-varying signals.
    Shore SE; Cullen JK
    Am J Otolaryngol; 1984; 5(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 6534192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cochlear action potential tuning curves recorded with a derived response technique.
    Salt AN; Garcia P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1392-402. PubMed ID: 2229674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modifications of cochlear microphonic frequency responses following transient changes of hydrostatic pressure in the perilymph.
    Legouix JP; Avan P; Lenoir M
    Hear Res; 1986; 23(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 3745014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear microphonic evidence for mechanical propagation of distortion products (f2 - f1) and (2f1 - f2).
    Gibian GL; Kim DO
    Hear Res; 1982 Jan; 6(1):35-59. PubMed ID: 7054135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The representation of the spectra and fundamental frequencies of steady-state single- and double-vowel sounds in the temporal discharge patterns of guinea pig cochlear-nerve fibers.
    Palmer AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1412-26. PubMed ID: 2229676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Offset AP masker tuning curve and the FFT of the stimulus.
    Henry KR; Lewis ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct; 84(4):1354-62. PubMed ID: 3198871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of direct current on dc receptor potentials from cochlear inner hair cells in the guinea pig.
    Nuttall AL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jan; 77(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 3973211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sectioning the efferent bundle decreases cochlear frequency selectivity.
    Carlier E; Pujol R
    Neurosci Lett; 1982 Jan; 28(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 7063139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory steady-state evoked potentials vs. compound action potentials for the measurement of suppression tuning curves in the sedated dog puppy.
    Markessis E; Poncelet L; Colin C; Hoonhorst I; Collet G; Deltenre P; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):455-62. PubMed ID: 20482293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tuning of the auditory brainstem OFF responses is complementary to tuning of the auditory brainstem ON response.
    Henry KR
    Hear Res; 1985; 19(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 4055531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modulation of the masking phenomenon by the crossed part of the medial olivocochlear bundle.
    Bonfils P; Puel JL; Orès S; Pujol R
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1987; 244(4):198-203. PubMed ID: 3689198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.