These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3209597)
1. The need for standards in an emerging discipline: clinical retrieval and analysis of surgical implants and biomaterials. Daniels AU J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Aug; 22(A2 Suppl):113-7. PubMed ID: 3209597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. FDA--medical device news corner. Medical device reporting (MDR) regulation. Salman NN; Richardson DC J Biomed Mater Res; 1988 Aug; 22(A2 Suppl):119-23. PubMed ID: 3209598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Standardization, control and approval of surgical implants in Europe]. Kure R; Haustveit G Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Feb; 114(5):591. PubMed ID: 8209346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality control of implants. Acta Orthop Scand; 1987 Oct; 58(5):477-8. PubMed ID: 3425271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Standardization, control and approval of surgical implants in Europe]. Reigstad A Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Nov; 113(28):3475-7. PubMed ID: 8273079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proposed guideline for the biological testing of orthopaedic implant materials and implants. Prepared by the Working Group on Biomaterials of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Biomaterials; 1980 Oct; 1(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 7470570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. World standards for surgical implants: an American perspective. Laing PG Biomaterials; 1994 May; 15(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 8080929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Standards for surgical implants. Brown PG Artif Organs; 1977 Aug; 1(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 616274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Standardized experimental procedures in tissue engineering: cure or curse. Russell AJ Tissue Eng; 2005; 11(9-10):vii-ix. PubMed ID: 16259585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NIH Biomaterials and Medical Implant Science Coordinating Committee. Watson JT ASAIO J; 1997; 43(4):370. PubMed ID: 9242956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Regulatory biocompatibility requirements for biomaterials used in regenerative medicine. Williams DF J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2015 Feb; 26(2):89. PubMed ID: 25649511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantifying the soft tissue response to implanted materials. Hunt JA; Williams DF Biomaterials; 1995 Feb; 16(3):167-70. PubMed ID: 7748991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direction or inertia: the future for regulation of surgical implant devices. Habal MB; Karlan MS; Leake D J Clin Eng; 1978; 3(2):186-8. PubMed ID: 10316638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of materials research in improving synthetic implants. Horowitz E Med Instrum; 1973; 7(2):108-9. PubMed ID: 4718484 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]