These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32096225)

  • 1. Quantitative readability analysis of websites providing information on traumatic brain injury and epilepsy: A need for clear communication.
    Correa DJ; Milano L; Kwon CS; Jetté N; Dlugos D; Harte-Hargrove L; Pugh MJ; Smith JK; Moshé SL
    Epilepsia; 2020 Mar; 61(3):528-538. PubMed ID: 32096225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.
    Huang G; Fang CH; Agarwal N; Bhagat N; Eloy JA; Langer PD
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 133(4):449-54. PubMed ID: 25654639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The quality, understandability, readability, and popularity of online educational materials for heart murmur.
    Arslan D; Sami Tutar M; Kozanhan B; Bagci Z
    Cardiol Young; 2020 Mar; 30(3):328-336. PubMed ID: 31875800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clearly written, easily comprehended? The readability of websites providing information on epilepsy.
    Brigo F; Otte WM; Igwe SC; Tezzon F; Nardone R
    Epilepsy Behav; 2015 Mar; 44():35-9. PubMed ID: 25601720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Readability assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to mammography for breast cancer screening.
    AlKhalili R; Shukla PA; Patel RH; Sanghvi S; Hubbi B
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):290-5. PubMed ID: 25488695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health Literacy in Clubfoot: A Quantitative Assessment of the Readability, Understandability and Actionability of Online Patient Education Material.
    Skalitzky MK; Gulbrandsen TR; Lorentzen W; Gao B; Shamrock AG; Weinstein SL; Morcuende JA
    Iowa Orthop J; 2021; 41(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 34552405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Readability assessment of Internet-based patient education materials related to endoscopic sinus surgery.
    Cherla DV; Sanghvi S; Choudhry OJ; Liu JK; Eloy JA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Aug; 122(8):1649-54. PubMed ID: 22685030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Readability of Shoulder and Elbow Patient Education Materials within Orthopaedic Websites.
    Beutel BG; Danna NR; Melamed E; Capo JT
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73(4):249-56. PubMed ID: 26630468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Readability assessment of online gynecologic oncology patient education materials from major governmental, non-profit and pharmaceutical organizations.
    Samuel D; Vilardo N; Isani SS; Kuo DYS; Gressel GM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):616-621. PubMed ID: 31324452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Most American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' online patient education material exceeds average patient reading level.
    Eltorai AE; Sharma P; Wang J; Daniels AH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1181-6. PubMed ID: 25475715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality and Readability of English-Language Internet Information for Tinnitus.
    Manchaiah V; Dockens AL; Flagge A; Bellon-Harn M; Azios JH; Kelly-Campbell RJ; Andersson G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 30461391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Readability analysis of online health information on preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
    Kecojevic A; Basch CH; Garcia P
    Public Health; 2020 May; 182():53-55. PubMed ID: 32171091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Readability of spine-related patient education materials from subspecialty organization and spine practitioner websites.
    Vives M; Young L; Sabharwal S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2826-31. PubMed ID: 19910867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readability assessment of online urology patient education materials.
    Colaco M; Svider PF; Agarwal N; Eloy JA; Jackson IM
    J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):1048-52. PubMed ID: 23017508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Readability, Content, and Quality Assessment of Web-Based Patient Education Materials Addressing Neuraxial Labor Analgesia.
    Patel SK; Gordon EJ; Wong CA; Grobman WA; Goucher H; Toledo P
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Nov; 121(5):1295-300. PubMed ID: 26252170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Current Status of Websites Offering Information to Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Caregivers: Time for Reform?
    Manivannan S; Baskaran R; Fisher J; Tasker I; Zaben M
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Sep; 153():e419-e427. PubMed ID: 34229103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Readability of patient education materials on the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine website.
    Eltorai AE; Han A; Truntzer J; Daniels AH
    Phys Sportsmed; 2014 Nov; 42(4):125-30. PubMed ID: 25419896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Readability analysis of online resources related to lung cancer.
    Weiss KD; Vargas CR; Ho OA; Chuang DJ; Weiss J; Lee BT
    J Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 206(1):90-97. PubMed ID: 27916381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Surgical Treatments of the Spine.
    Phan A; Jubril A; Menga E; Mesfin A
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e583-e588. PubMed ID: 34139351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information.
    Walsh TM; Volsko TA
    Respir Care; 2008 Oct; 53(10):1310-5. PubMed ID: 18811992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.