BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

919 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32096852)

  • 1. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
    Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Association of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Risk of Interval Invasive and Advanced Breast Cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Su YR; Sprague BL; Tosteson ANA; Buist DSM; Onega T; Henderson LM; Alsheik N; Bissell MCS; O'Meara ES; Lee CI; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA; 2022 Jun; 327(22):2220-2230. PubMed ID: 35699706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.
    Lowry KP; Coley RY; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Herschorn S; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher G; Lee CI
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2011792. PubMed ID: 32721031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.
    Conant EF; Barlow WE; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Beaber EF; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Lowry KP; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Li CI; Schnall MD; Onega T; Sprague BL;
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 May; 5(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
    Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection among Women with a History of Breast Cancer.
    Kim MY; Suh YJ; An YY
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Oct; 29(10):1458-1465. PubMed ID: 35033452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
    Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
    Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection in dense breasts? A retrospective preliminary study with comparable results.
    Ramli Hamid MT; Ab Mumin N; Abdul Hamid S; Ahmad Saman MS; Rahmat K
    Clin Radiol; 2024 Apr; 79(4):e524-e531. PubMed ID: 38267349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Adjunctive Ultrasonography for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women Aged 40-49 Years With Varying Breast Density Undergoing Screening Mammography: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Harada-Shoji N; Suzuki A; Ishida T; Zheng YF; Narikawa-Shiono Y; Sato-Tadano A; Ohta R; Ohuchi N
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Aug; 4(8):e2121505. PubMed ID: 34406400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abbreviated Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Supplemental Screening of Women With Dense Breasts and Average Risk.
    Weinstein SP; Korhonen K; Cirelli C; Schnall MD; McDonald ES; Pantel AR; Zuckerman S; Borthakur A; Conant EF
    J Clin Oncol; 2020 Nov; 38(33):3874-3882. PubMed ID: 32931396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography.
    Ho TH; Bissell MCS; Kerlikowske K; Hubbard RA; Sprague BL; Lee CI; Tice JA; Tosteson ANA; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA Netw Open; 2022 Mar; 5(3):e222440. PubMed ID: 35333365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Ultrasound Versus Digital Mammography Plus Ultrasound for Screening Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts.
    Ha SM; Yi A; Yim D; Jang MJ; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Lee EJ; Lee SH; Moon WK; Chang JM
    Korean J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 24(4):274-283. PubMed ID: 36996902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography for Detection of Early-Stage Cancers Stratified by Grade: A TOSYMA Subanalysis.
    Weigel S; Heindel W; Decker T; Weyer-Elberich V; Kerschke L; Gerß J; Hense HW;
    Radiology; 2023 Dec; 309(3):e231533. PubMed ID: 38051184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supplemental magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography compared with magnetic resonance imaging or mammography by extent of breast density.
    Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Su YR; Sprague BL; Stout NK; Onega T; O'Meara ES; Henderson LM; Tosteson ANA; Wernli K; Miglioretti DL
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2024 Feb; 116(2):249-257. PubMed ID: 37897090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.
    Kim WH; Chang JM; Moon HG; Yi A; Koo HR; Gweon HM; Moon WK
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1556-64. PubMed ID: 26376882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Economic evaluation of supplemental breast cancer screening modalities to mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts and average or intermediate breast cancer risk in US healthcare.
    Blankenburg M; Sánchez-Collado I; Soyemi BO; Åkerborg Ö; Caleyachetty A; Harris J; Morris E; Newstead G; Lobig F
    J Med Econ; 2023; 26(1):850-861. PubMed ID: 37278659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
    Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme--a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone.
    Gilbert FJ; Tucker L; Gillan MG; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Lim YY; Purushothaman H; Strudley C; Astley SM; Morrish O; Young KC; Duffy SW
    Health Technol Assess; 2015 Jan; 19(4):i-xxv, 1-136. PubMed ID: 25599513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.