191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32097025)
21. PathSys: integrating molecular interaction graphs for systems biology.
Baitaluk M; Qian X; Godbole S; Raval A; Ray A; Gupta A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():55. PubMed ID: 16464251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Linking Cytoscape and the corynebacterial reference database CoryneRegNet.
Baumbach J; Apeltsin L
BMC Genomics; 2008 Apr; 9():184. PubMed ID: 18426593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Whole-Exome Sequencing of Metastatic Cancer and Biomarkers of Treatment Response.
Beltran H; Eng K; Mosquera JM; Sigaras A; Romanel A; Rennert H; Kossai M; Pauli C; Faltas B; Fontugne J; Park K; Banfelder J; Prandi D; Madhukar N; Zhang T; Padilla J; Greco N; McNary TJ; Herrscher E; Wilkes D; MacDonald TY; Xue H; Vacic V; Emde AK; Oschwald D; Tan AY; Chen Z; Collins C; Gleave ME; Wang Y; Chakravarty D; Schiffman M; Kim R; Campagne F; Robinson BD; Nanus DM; Tagawa ST; Xiang JZ; Smogorzewska A; Demichelis F; Rickman DS; Sboner A; Elemento O; Rubin MA
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Jul; 1(4):466-74. PubMed ID: 26181256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Integration of somatic mutation, expression and functional data reveals potential driver genes predictive of breast cancer survival.
Suo C; Hrydziuszko O; Lee D; Pramana S; Saputra D; Joshi H; Calza S; Pawitan Y
Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 31(16):2607-13. PubMed ID: 25810432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Using CellMiner 1.6 for Systems Pharmacology and Genomic Analysis of the NCI-60.
Reinhold WC; Sunshine M; Varma S; Doroshow JH; Pommier Y
Clin Cancer Res; 2015 Sep; 21(17):3841-52. PubMed ID: 26048278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Integrative pathway-based survival prediction utilizing the interaction between gene expression and DNA methylation in breast cancer.
Kim SY; Kim TR; Jeong HH; Sohn KA
BMC Med Genomics; 2018 Sep; 11(Suppl 3):68. PubMed ID: 30255812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Data Mining Approaches for Genomic Biomarker Development: Applications Using Drug Screening Data from the Cancer Genome Project and the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia.
Covell DG
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0127433. PubMed ID: 26132924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Integrative Network Analysis of Differentially Methylated and Expressed Genes for Biomarker Identification in Leukemia.
Sanchez R; Mackenzie SA
Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2123. PubMed ID: 32034170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Bioinformatics Tools and Resources for Cancer Immunotherapy Study.
Palmisano A; Krushkal J; Li MC; Fang J; Sonkin D; Wright G; Yee L; Zhao Y; McShane L
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2055():649-678. PubMed ID: 31502173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fast and flexible analysis of linked microbiome data with mako.
Röttjers L; Faust K
Nat Methods; 2022 Jan; 19(1):51-54. PubMed ID: 34887550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Tumor relevant protein functional interactions identified using bipartite graph analyses.
Venkatraman DL; Pulimamidi D; Shukla HG; Hegde SR
Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):21530. PubMed ID: 34728699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Bayesian approach to incorporating different types of biomedical knowledge bases into information retrieval systems for clinical decision support in precision medicine.
Balaneshinkordan S; Kotov A
J Biomed Inform; 2019 Oct; 98():103238. PubMed ID: 31301513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A query language for biological networks.
Leser U
Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21 Suppl 2():ii33-9. PubMed ID: 16204121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. CoGA: An R Package to Identify Differentially Co-Expressed Gene Sets by Analyzing the Graph Spectra.
Santos Sde S; Galatro TF; Watanabe RA; Oba-Shinjo SM; Nagahashi Marie SK; Fujita A
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0135831. PubMed ID: 26313749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Integrative network biology: graph prototyping for co-expression cancer networks.
Kugler KG; Mueller LA; Graber A; Dehmer M
PLoS One; 2011; 6(7):e22843. PubMed ID: 21829532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Linking experimental results, biological networks and sequence analysis methods using Ontologies and Generalised Data Structures.
Koehler J; Rawlings C; Verrier P; Mitchell R; Skusa A; Ruegg A; Philippi S
In Silico Biol; 2005; 5(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 15972003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. SING: subgraph search in non-homogeneous graphs.
Di Natale R; Ferro A; Giugno R; Mongiovì M; Pulvirenti A; Shasha D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():96. PubMed ID: 20170516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Exploiting semantic patterns over biomedical knowledge graphs for predicting treatment and causative relations.
Bakal G; Talari P; Kakani EV; Kavuluru R
J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jun; 82():189-199. PubMed ID: 29763706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Unsupervised construction of computational graphs for gene expression data with explicit structural inductive biases.
Scherer P; Trębacz M; Simidjievski N; Viñas R; Shams Z; Terre HA; Jamnik M; Liò P
Bioinformatics; 2022 Feb; 38(5):1320-1327. PubMed ID: 34888618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. FORG3D: force-directed 3D graph editor for visualization of integrated genome scale data.
Paananen J; Wong G
BMC Syst Biol; 2009 Feb; 3():26. PubMed ID: 19239683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
