124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32097971)
1. Comparison of semiquantitative metabolic parameters of the primary tumor obtained in PET/CT with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT in patients with cervical cancer.
Cegła P; Burchardt E; Cholewiński W; Gwóźdź S; Roszak A; Kubiak A; Kaczmarek A; Czepczyński R
Nuklearmedizin; 2020 Jun; 59(3):241-247. PubMed ID: 32097971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of biological parameters in head and neck cancer based on in vivo distribution of
Cegla P; Kazmierska J; Gwozdz S; Czepczynski R; Malicki J; Cholewinski W
Tumori; 2020 Feb; 106(1):33-38. PubMed ID: 31446858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A pilot study of the diagnostic and prognostic values of FLT-PET/CT for pancreatic cancer: comparison with FDG-PET/CT.
Nakajo M; Kajiya Y; Tani A; Jinguji M; Nakajo M; Nihara T; Fukukura Y; Yoshiura T
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Apr; 42(4):1210-1221. PubMed ID: 27891549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic value comparison between (18)F-FLT PET/CT and (18)F-FDG PET/CT volume-based metabolic parameters in patients with head and neck cancer.
Hoshikawa H; Mori T; Yamamoto Y; Kishino T; Fukumura T; Samukawa Y; Mori N; Nishiyama Y
Clin Nucl Med; 2015 Jun; 40(6):464-8. PubMed ID: 25546204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. (18)F-FDG and (18)F-FLT PET/CT imaging in the characterization of mediastinal lymph nodes.
Rayamajhi SJ; Mittal BR; Maturu VN; Agarwal R; Bal A; Dey P; Shukla J; Gupta D
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Apr; 30(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 26661845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic Value of the Sum of Metabolic Tumor Volume of Primary Tumor and Lymph Nodes Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
Hong JH; Min KJ; Lee JK; So KA; Jung US; Kim S; Eo JS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(9):e2992. PubMed ID: 26945420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined pre-treatment MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as prognostic biomarkers in patients with cervical cancer.
Miccò M; Vargas HA; Burger IA; Kollmeier MA; Goldman DA; Park KJ; Abu-Rustum NR; Hricak H; Sala E
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1169-1176. PubMed ID: 24767630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of Biological Parameters Assessed in [18F]FDG PET/CT on Overall Survival in Cervical Cancer Patients.
Cegla P; Burchardt E; Roszak A; Czepczynski R; Kubiak A; Cholewinski W
Clin Nucl Med; 2019 Nov; 44(11):860-863. PubMed ID: 31348081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of posttreatment
Lima GM; Matti A; Vara G; Dondi G; Naselli N; De Crescenzo EM; Morganti AG; Perrone AM; De Iaco P; Nanni C; Fanti S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2018 Nov; 45(12):2139-2146. PubMed ID: 30069578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluorothymidine PET/CT for primary colorectal cancer and its lymph node metastasis: comparison with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT.
Nakajo M; Nakajo M; Kajiya Y; Jinguji M; Nishimata N; Shimaoka S; Nihara T; Aridome K; Tanaka S; Fukukura Y; Tani A; Koriyama C
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Aug; 40(8):1223-32. PubMed ID: 23653240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pre- and per-treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters to predict recurrence and survival in cervical cancer.
Leseur J; Roman-Jimenez G; Devillers A; Ospina-Arango JD; Williaume D; Castelli J; Terve P; Lavoue V; Garin E; Lejeune F; Acosta O; De Crevoisier R
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):512-518. PubMed ID: 27569847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The feasibility of
Liu S; Xia L; Yang Z; Ge H; Wang C; Pan H; Song S; Zhou Z
Cancer Imaging; 2020 Sep; 20(1):63. PubMed ID: 32912310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of Various Metabolic Parameters Derived From Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as Prognostic Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy.
Sharma A; Mohan A; Bhalla AS; Sharma MC; Vishnubhatla S; Das CJ; Pandey AK; Sekhar Bal C; Patel CD; Sharma P; Agarwal KK; Kumar R
Clin Nucl Med; 2018 Jan; 43(1):e8-e17. PubMed ID: 29112011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combinative evaluation of primary tumor and lymph nodes in predicting pelvic lymphatic metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer: A multiparametric PET-CT study.
Li K; Sun H; Guo Q
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Apr; 113():153-157. PubMed ID: 30927941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal FDG PET/CT volumetric parameters for risk stratification in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results from the ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 trial.
Salavati A; Duan F; Snyder BS; Wei B; Houshmand S; Khiewvan B; Opanowski A; Simone CB; Siegel BA; Machtay M; Alavi A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Nov; 44(12):1969-1983. PubMed ID: 28689281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A pilot study for texture analysis of
Nakajo M; Kajiya Y; Tani A; Jinguji M; Nakajo M; Kitazono M; Yoshiura T
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Dec; 44(13):2158-2168. PubMed ID: 28770274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of Intratumoral Metabolic Heterogeneity and Quantitative
Pinho DF; King B; Xi Y; Albuquerque K; Lea J; Subramaniam RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Apr; 214(4):908-916. PubMed ID: 32069078
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic Value of Volume-Based Metabolic Parameters of
Han S; Kim H; Kim YJ; Suh CH; Woo S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1112-1121. PubMed ID: 30207790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of
Mori M; Fujioka T; Ichikawa R; Inomata R; Katsuta L; Yashima Y; Yamaga E; Tsuchiya J; Hayashi K; Kumaki Y; Oda G; Nakagawa T; Onishi I; Kubota K; Tateishi U
Tomography; 2022 Oct; 8(5):2533-2546. PubMed ID: 36287810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Volume-metabolic Combined Parameters from (18)F-FDG PET/CT May Help Predict the Outcomes of Cervical Carcinoma.
Sun Y; Lu P; Yu L
Acad Radiol; 2016 May; 23(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 26853968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
