These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32098423)

  • 1. Hybrid Methodology to Improve Health Status Utility Values Derivation Using EQ-5D-5L and Advanced Multi-Criteria Techniques.
    Vásquez J; Botero S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32098423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A hybrid modelling approach for eliciting health state preferences: the Portuguese EQ-5D-5L value set.
    Ferreira PL; Antunes P; Ferreira LN; Pereira LN; Ramos-Goñi JM
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3163-3175. PubMed ID: 31201730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS.
    Chen CH
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 Feb; 22(2):. PubMed ID: 33286032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mapping the SRS-22r questionnaire onto the EQ-5D-5L utility score in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Wong CKH; Cheung PWH; Samartzis D; Luk KD; Cheung KMC; Lam CLK; Cheung JPY
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175847. PubMed ID: 28414745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of an integrated multi-criteria decision making AHP-TOPSIS methodology for ETL software selection.
    Hanine M; Boutkhoum O; Tikniouine A; Agouti T
    Springerplus; 2016; 5():263. PubMed ID: 27006872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study in Thailand.
    Pattanaphesaj J; Thavorncharoensap M; Ramos-Goñi JM; Tongsiri S; Ingsrisawang L; Teerawattananon Y
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2018 Oct; 18(5):551-558. PubMed ID: 29958008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bottled water quality ranking via the multiple-criteria decision-making process: a case study of two-stage fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS.
    Nabizadeh R; Yousefzadeh S; Yaghmaeian K; Alimohammadi M; Mokhtari Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):20437-20448. PubMed ID: 34735703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.
    Law EH; Pickard AS; Xie F; Walton SM; Lee TA; Schwartz A
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):968-982. PubMed ID: 30403577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cobot selection using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS based multi-criteria decision making technique for fuel filter assembly process.
    C S; Subramaniam SK
    Heliyon; 2024 Feb; 10(4):e26374. PubMed ID: 38390129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mapping Sri Lankan EQ-5D-3L to EQ-5D-5L Value Sets.
    Kularatna S; Chen G; Byrnes J; Scuffham PA
    Value Health Reg Issues; 2017 May; 12():20-23. PubMed ID: 28648311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3125 steps to perfect health: a nonparametric approach to developing the EQ-5D-5L value set.
    Thomas S; Johnson JA; Xie F
    Qual Life Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3109-3118. PubMed ID: 32705459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison of Generic and Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures Using Data From Nivolumab Trials: EQ-5D-3L, Mapping to the EQ-5D-5L, and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Utility Measure-Core 10 Dimensions.
    Shaw JW; Bennett B; Trigg A; DeRosa M; Taylor F; Kiff C; Ntais D; Noon K; King MT; Cocks K
    Value Health; 2021 Nov; 24(11):1651-1659. PubMed ID: 34711366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating Cost-Effectiveness Using Alternative Preference-Based Scores and Within-Trial Methods: Exploring the Dynamics of the Quality-Adjusted Life-Year Using the EQ-5D 5-Level Version and Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index.
    Franklin M; Hunter RM; Enrique A; Palacios J; Richards D
    Value Health; 2022 Jun; 25(6):1018-1029. PubMed ID: 35667775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Japanese Population Norms of EQ-5D-5L and Health Utilities Index Mark 3: Disutility Catalog by Disease and Symptom in Community Settings.
    Shiroiwa T; Noto S; Fukuda T
    Value Health; 2021 Aug; 24(8):1193-1202. PubMed ID: 34372985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating 5-Level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) Values Based on Preferences of Patients With Heart Disease.
    Gandhi M; Tan RS; Lim SL; Rand K; Lam CSP; Luo N; Cheung YB
    Value Health; 2022 Mar; 25(3):451-460. PubMed ID: 35227458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Choice Defines QALYs: A US Valuation of the EQ-5D-5L.
    Craig BM; Rand K
    Med Care; 2018 Jun; 56(6):529-536. PubMed ID: 29668646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utility Values for Health States in Ireland: A Value Set for the EQ-5D-5L.
    Hobbins A; Barry L; Kelleher D; Shah K; Devlin N; Goni JMR; O'Neill C
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Nov; 36(11):1345-1353. PubMed ID: 30051267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quebec Health-Related Quality-of-Life Population Norms Using the EQ-5D-5L: Decomposition by Sociodemographic Data and Health Problems.
    Poder TG; Carrier N; Kouakou CRC
    Value Health; 2020 Feb; 23(2):251-259. PubMed ID: 32113631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Valuation of EQ-5D-5L Health States in Poland: the First EQ-VT-Based Study in Central and Eastern Europe.
    Golicki D; Jakubczyk M; Graczyk K; Niewada M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Sep; 37(9):1165-1176. PubMed ID: 31161586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.