These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32098907)

  • 1. The 'Expiry Problem' of broad consent for biobank research - And why a meta consent model solves it.
    Ploug T; Holm S
    J Med Ethics; 2020 Sep; 46(9):629-631. PubMed ID: 32098907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The biobank consent debate: why 'meta-consent' is still the solution!
    Ploug T; Holm S
    J Med Ethics; 2019 May; 45(5):295-297. PubMed ID: 30872326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The biobank consent debate: Why 'meta-consent' is not the solution?
    Manson NC
    J Med Ethics; 2019 May; 45(5):291-294. PubMed ID: 30275112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The ethics of biobanking: Assessing the right to control problem for broad consent.
    Manson NC
    Bioethics; 2019 Jun; 33(5):540-549. PubMed ID: 30667086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consent, ethics and genetic biobanks: the case of the Athlome project.
    Thompson R; McNamee MJ
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Nov; 18(Suppl 8):830. PubMed ID: 29143655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The case against meta-consent: not only do Ploug and Holm not
    Manson NC
    J Med Ethics; 2020 Sep; 46(9):627-628. PubMed ID: 31811014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Broad consent for biobanks is best - provided it is also deep.
    Mikkelsen RB; Gjerris M; Waldemar G; Sandøe P
    BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Oct; 20(1):71. PubMed ID: 31615491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethics of dead participants: policy recommendations for biobank research.
    Ursin L; Stuifbergen M
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Oct; 44(10):695-699. PubMed ID: 29921618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biobank Participants' Attitudes toward Requiring Understanding for Biobank Consent.
    Kasperbauer TJ; Halverson C; Garcia A; Schmidt KK; Schwartz PH
    Ethics Hum Res; 2022 Jan; 44(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 34936236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding the Public's Reservations about Broad Consent and Study-By-Study Consent for Donations to a Biobank: Results of a National Survey.
    De Vries RG; Tomlinson T; Kim HM; Krenz C; Haggerty D; Ryan KA; Kim SY
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159113. PubMed ID: 27415017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Researchers' Perspectives on Informed Consent and Ethical Review of Biobank Research in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Mwaka E; Horn L
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Oct; 14(4):307-317. PubMed ID: 31378129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Permission to Contact Platform Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Enrollment Method for a Biobank to Create Study-Specific Research Cohorts.
    Carvalho K; Gali B; LeBlanc J; Matzke LA; Watson PH
    Biopreserv Biobank; 2021 Aug; 19(4):250-257. PubMed ID: 33464175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem?
    Steinsbekk KS; Kåre Myskja B; Solberg B
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Sep; 21(9):897-902. PubMed ID: 23299918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. At a Moment's Notice: Community Advisory Board Perspectives on Biobank Communication to Supplement Broad Consent.
    Meagher KM; Curtis SH; Gamm KO; Sutton EJ; McCormick JB; Sharp RR
    Public Health Genomics; 2020; 23(3-4):77-89. PubMed ID: 32396907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A proposal for a model of informed consent for the collection, storage and use of biological materials for research purposes.
    Porteri C; Borry P
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Apr; 71(1):136-42. PubMed ID: 18243633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ambiguities and Asymmetries in Consent and Refusal: Reply to Manson.
    Lawlor R
    Bioethics; 2016 Jun; 30(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 26424104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research participants' perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: a review of empirical data and ethical analysis.
    D'Abramo F; Schildmann J; Vollmann J
    BMC Med Ethics; 2015 Sep; 16():60. PubMed ID: 26354520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Informed Consent in the Newly Established Biobank.
    Kinkorová J; Topolčan O; Kučera R
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31623267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linking Broad Consent to Biobank Governance: Support From a Deliberative Public Engagement in California.
    Garrett SB; Dohan D; Koenig BA
    Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(9):56-7. PubMed ID: 26305757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Broad consent in practice: lessons learned from a hospital-based biobank for prospective research on genomic and medical data.
    Barazzetti G; Bosisio F; Koutaissoff D; Spencer B
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2020 Jul; 28(7):915-924. PubMed ID: 32086443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.